ImagineSim Atlanta Updated.

[Zimmerbz 168]

Where do you get it?  I don't mind the original version even though it isn't as good as most other 3rd party.  I couldn't find where to download the update. 

[Flic1 1,000]

4 minutes ago, Zimmerbz said:

Where do you get it?  I don't mind the original version even though it isn't as good as most other 3rd party.  I couldn't find where to download the update. 

Go to the Imaginesim site and download their 'Operations Center' if you don't already have it.  You can then enter your purchase info into that and download the update, choose your config settings, etc..

[Zimmerbz 168]

Just now, Flic1 said:

Go to the Imaginesim site and download their 'Operations Center' if you don't already have it.  You can then enter your purchase info into that and download the update, choose your config settings, etc..

Ah... good call, i forgot about that

[cavaricooper 2,615]

I’m still hoping they got their flies confused… otherwise they would have been better off not publicizing an update. With today’s tech, there’s just no room for missing taxiways and hangars. Fingers x’ed!

[Wise87 1,286]

iniBuilds said they weren't going to touch Atlanta. I hope someone like FlyTampa decided to take on the project. 

[threexgreen 3,156]

5 minutes ago, Wise87 said:

I hope someone like FlyTampa decided to take on the project. 

They did and shelved it two years ago after years of silence.

[F737MAX 5,738]

48 minutes ago, Wise87 said:

I hope someone like FlyTampa decided to take on the project. 

Like 3XGreen said, FlyTampa had KATL pinned on their map, then dropped it.

Flightbeam would be a good candidate—large, US airport sceneries is Mir's speciality.

[Sunshine13 234]

it's a real shame after 3 years+ no developer has really touched KATL !!  Needs a little luv!!

[Greazer 1,349]

Waiting for Inibuilds version 😐

[Wise87 1,286]

2 hours ago, Greazer said:

Waiting for Inibuilds version 😐

Don't think they are going to touch it due to the heavy photogrammetry and some systems just can’t handle their scenery. 

Link 1

Link 2

 

Edited February 10 by Wise87

[cavaricooper 2,615]

What an absolute shame- ImagineSim had the perfect opportunity to get this right... ah well... I suppose I will stay with the Aosbo Handcrafted ATL.

Edited February 10 by cavaricooper

[B777ER 2,492]

Terrible. KALT will remain a no go zone for my flying. Don’t think I’ve flown there but just 1 time in the last 2 years 

[cavaricooper 2,615]

You should absolutely go- the Asobo version isn't horrible- AND ZATL ATC is brilliant!

[Greazer 1,349]

2 hours ago, Wise87 said:

Don't think they are going to touch it due to the heavy photogrammetry and some systems just can’t handle their scenery. 

Link 1

Link 2

These are not valid excuses for Not doing an airport.

We have a much better optimized Sim with dynamic LOD and FSR3. And the next Sim Update on March 12 will optimize memory and glass cockpit rendering. Performance will be improved.

Surrounding photogrammetry will not be an issue unless very low spec system, and they can turn it off anyway.

[micstatic 4,340]

just curious.  Has anybody actually compared imaginesim V2 vs the handcrafted?  Neither looks great, but wondering which is better as of today.