This week, I'm moving from 2020 to 2024. I currently use PSXT in 2020 as I like the realism of correct runways being used (especially at somewhere like EGLL).

What's the best solution for 2024? Should I continue with PSXT?

In short Sir AI Traffic in MSFS 2024 ain't worth (    ).

            Happy Landings

P.S. And their so called ships and routes blah

 

Edited May 24, 20251 yr by jwhak

2 minutes ago, jwhak said:

In short Sir AI Traffic in MSFS 2024 ain't worth (    ).

            Happy Landings

 

So what's the best alternative...PSXT, FSLTL, AIG et..?

PSXT with FsTraffic (1st) and AIG (2nd) ac is the most realistic you can have. Nothing beats seeing ac taxiing/taking off/landing in Fs , knowing that in reality they are at the same spots too ( 30 sec delay )

I use it myself. 

2 minutes ago, GSalden said:

PSXT with FsTraffic (1st) and AIG (2nd) ac is the most realistic you can have. Nothing beats seeing ac taxiing/taking off/landing in Fs , knowing that in reality they are at the same spots too ( 30 sec delay )

I use it myself. 

any reason to prioritize FST over AIG?

4 minutes ago, GSalden said:

knowing that in reality they are at the same spots too ( 30 sec delay )

Unless you do not fly real time, what is the case in 95% of my flights because of the time of day I have my simming session slots 🙈🤣 Then it is AIG with AI Traffic Controller.

Edited May 24, 20251 yr by AnkH

16 minutes ago, AnkH said:

Unless you do not fly real time, what is the case in 95% of my flights because of the time of day I have my simming session slots 🙈🤣 Then it is AIG with AI Traffic Controller.

But they'll be incorrect runways used this way, right? Like at EGLL, they'll be landing and taking off on both?

Personally publicly available, I’d recommend BeyondATC

I pretty much fly real time 95% of the time. I use AIG because of their updated flight schedules. But If your're plan on running SU3 stay away from AIG if you're using SU2 then all is fine.

47 minutes ago, BWBriscoe said:

So what's the best alternative...PSXT, FSLTL, AIG et..?

MSFS 2020.  Love 2024 for its forward steps but some of the steps back hurt.

 

1 hour ago, Kaiii3 said:

any reason to prioritize FST over AIG?

It is using AIG ac + FsTraffic ac by PSXT. 
As the FsTraffic models are less heavy in the framerate than AIG models ( tested difference 34 fps VS 37 fps ) , I have PSXT first look for a matching FsTraffic model and if that one does not exist it will look at the AIG models.

AIG ac have real world registrations, while FsTraffic has not.

 

1 hour ago, AnkH said:

Unless you do not fly real time, what is the case in 95% of my flights because of the time of day I have my simming session slots 🙈🤣 Then it is AIG with AI Traffic Controller.

Everyone’s choice.

Myself I fly in realtime only.

AIG is an outstanding traffic package 👍

BeyondATC works pretty well. In my case the only issue I find is that the planes stutter quite a bit but hey this is MSFS2024 when pretty much everything stutters at some point!

12 hours ago, Kaiii3 said:

any reason to prioritize FST over AIG?

for me AIG increases stutter at large airports (default and 3rd party) and during flight, FSLTL less stutter at airports and smoother during flight.

13 hours ago, BWBriscoe said:

But they'll be incorrect runways used this way, right? Like at EGLL, they'll be landing and taking off on both?

Yes, THE drawback of AIG using AIGTC is that MSFS controls AI traffic, which we all know is a mess