it was golden the other day seeing chewie having an issue with that rubbish inibuilds 350, which i believe hes a sponsor off. 

 

On 8/3/2025 at 12:36 AM, Keirtt said:

I appreciate that iniBuilds is actively working to resolve WASM related crashes, especially with the recent July 2025 development update and the creation of a WASM testing group.

 

So people in the testing group are working for FREE to help them resolve the WASM issue on a payware aircraft 🙃

3 hours ago, JBDB-MD80 said:

Meh?  Their products were better in the other sim. No one seriously would put INI up there with PMDG, FSL, Fenix etc. but go ahead and praise mediocrity that has to be updated weekly to be somewhat respectable.

What difference does it make how often updates are released to fix issues as long as they are continually staying active with them. I praise their commitment to the hobby and yet to find any mediocre with the A350 after 100+ hours of flight. I also own the Fenix and PMDG and they all have their flaws. I see no matter what they (Ini) do you'll find a reason to feel the way you do. That's your opinion but I don't share those views. I wish more developers would do the same releasing updates.

Is the A350 considered fully functional now ?

I bought it when it came out but haven’t flown it or updated it since as there were so many people complaining about it I just left it.

I wonder if they're going to do EIS1 oder EIS2. The former would be cool, a lot of A340 frames were delivered with the older CRT displays... 

Edited August 4, 2025Aug 4 by thepilot

10 minutes ago, jon b said:

Is the A350 considered fully functional now ?

I bought it when it came out but haven’t flown it or updated it since as there were so many people complaining about it I just left it.

some user have had issues but for myself, got it from day one  and done about 6  10 hour flights with no crashes at all. The way to find out is to to update it and find out for your self. Just because other users saying they having issues doesn't mean you will be one of them

4 hours ago, JBDB-MD80 said:

Meh?  Their products were better in the other sim. No one seriously would put INI up there with PMDG, FSL, Fenix etc. but go ahead and praise mediocrity that has to be updated weekly to be somewhat respectable.

I have to agree with you. They aren’t anywhere near the level of those other guys, but still respect what they do bring to the game. They just need to dial back their advertising a bit and be a little more realistic when setting expectations…

Yeah, but I prefer being told what to think 😄

Plus, I don’t know the first thing about Airbus so won’t know if it’s complete or not.

I was thinking about starting to learn how to fly Airbus but won’t use this one if it’s not accurate.

There’s more than one Airbus in my virtual hanger, I have a long record of buying Airbus models and never flying them !

1 hour ago, Bigmack said:

I also own the Fenix and PMDG and they all have their flaws. I see no matter what they (Ini) do you'll find a reason to feel the way you do. That's your opinion but I don't share those views. I wish more developers would do the same releasing updates.

Problem here is that if PMDG or Fenix released an aircraft in the state that Ini released theirs, they would get chastised but no not Ini and the MS partnership.

Yes they all have flaws but Ini is on a new level of flaws.

Edited August 4, 2025Aug 4 by JBDB-MD80

23 minutes ago, JBDB-MD80 said:

Problem here is that if PMDG or Fenix released an aircraft in the state that Ini released theirs, they would get chastised but no not Ini and the MS partnership.

Yes they all have flaws but Ini is on a new level of flaws.

Again, that's your opinion. PMDG and Fenix release states were chastised and had problems, read their support forums. And they all released updates to address their issues. Not sure what you consider a new level of flaws, but I can fly and program the systems of the A350 quite effectively and not running into any flaws. It works for me and many many others. If you don't like the aircraft, then stay away from it and fly those that meet your expectations. Nothing else to say.

34 minutes ago, Bigmack said:

Again, that's your opinion. PMDG and Fenix release states were chastised and had problems, read their support forums. And they all released updates to address their issues. Not sure what you consider a new level of flaws, but I can fly and program the systems of the A350 quite effectively and not running into any flaws. It works for me and many many others. If you don't like the aircraft, then stay away from it and fly those that meet your expectations. Nothing else to say.

So are you saying they're not allowed to voice their opinion because it's a negative one and doesn't align with yours? Most of this thread is opinions - to use your own words, if you don't like his opinion then just stay away from it and move on.

I haven't used the A350 in months, deeply regret purchasing it and really wish Fenix somehow change their minds and still develop one in the end.

2 hours ago, jon b said:

Is the A350 considered fully functional now ?

It's been functioning fine for me since day 1.

It seems to vary from person to person. Some people get WASM crashes constantly, some rarely, some not at all.

I've only had around 3 since launch and those happened months later not during the very first version, and with around 220 hours across both variants.

I've been flying it early weekly since launch. Though I've taken a step back since the 777s, 737 max have come out to add some variety.

Edited August 4, 2025Aug 4 by Tuskin38

36 minutes ago, Speedbird 217 said:

So are you saying they're not allowed to voice their opinion because it's a negative one and doesn't align with yours? Most of this thread is opinions - to use your own words, if you don't like his opinion then just stay away from it and move on.

I haven't used the A350 in months, deeply regret purchasing it and really wish Fenix somehow change their minds and still develop one in the end.

agreed 100 percent.

same boat.  not used for months.  Most of my "flightsim friends" also find it terrible.  

Yet the bar is set so low nowadays, devs can pass anything off.

 

1 hour ago, Speedbird 217 said:

So are you saying they're not allowed to voice their opinion because it's a negative one and doesn't align with yours? Most of this thread is opinions - to use your own words, if you don't like his opinion then just stay away from it and move on.

I haven't used the A350 in months, deeply regret purchasing it and really wish Fenix somehow change their minds and still develop one in the end.

His opinion is welcomed, and I have no problem whether or not it aligns with what I think or not. There are people that will be negative no matter what the positives are. Maybe you should give the A350 another try and see if you still have regrets. But if not then that's your decision.