Yesterday at 09:19 PM1 day Hey simmers, who is using Fshud Traffic? ScreenshotI think I will keep subsription! EU Airport approved😎 What about you?
23 hours ago23 hr I'm using FSHud along with AIG, but not the subscription add-on. Joel Murray @ CYVR (actually, somewhere about halfway between CYNJ and CZBB)Â
22 hours ago22 hr I use FSHud but since FSLTL was revived by Navigraph I've had no use for the subscription. MSI Pro Z690-A DDR4 | i5 13600KF | G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB 3600MHz | RTX 3080 (12GB) |Â Samsung 980 M.2 NVMe 500GB | Samsung 980 M.2 NVMe 1TBÂ | Samsung 850EVO 500GB | Crucial P3+ 2TB NVMe | 2TB Seagate HDD | Deepcool AK500 CPU Cooler | Thrustmaster T16000M HOTAS | CH Yoke | Various Winctrl hardware | 21:9 1440p UW monitor | Win 11 23H2 build | MSFS2020 / MSFS2024|Tony K. Â
22 hours ago22 hr I use FShud with AIG traffic. No subscription needed and works well for me. Martin Sims: MSFS 2020, MSFS 2024 and X-plane 11 Home Airport: CYCW - Chilliwack, BC Canada i5 13600KF 32GB DDR4 3600 RAM, RTX3080TI Meta Quest 3
16 hours ago16 hr Author Thanks for the replies! Interesting to see most of you are running FSHud without the subscription. For me the historical flights feature is what keeps me subscribed. Since most of my flying happens late evening, loading earlier traffic makes a real difference in how alive the airport feels. I still use AIG for model quality, but the traffic patterns from FSHud Traffic feel more realistic for offline sessions. Curious if anyone here has actually tried the historical option?
11 hours ago11 hr I'm running with FSHud Traffic and AIG (TC + external options). This combination gives me as much traffic as I need, and AIGTC fills in a few gaps where FSHud Traffic misses the odd Airport/Airline/Flight. I use the simulator time option for FSHud Traffic - is this what you referred to as historical? Edited 11 hours ago11 hr by ConstVoid Ian Box
10 hours ago10 hr Count me in as a subscriber too. For me the big thing was how well the injected traffic matches real operations - I've compared it side by side with FlightRadar24 at a few busier airports and saw maybe 80-90% correspondence depending on the airport and time of day. Both departures and arrivals looking right, not just one or the other. That kind of realism matters a lot when I'm doing offline IFR and want the airport to feel alive. The FSHud airport configuration side is a nice bonus. Being able to set which runways are active and having the traffic actually respect that setup makes the whole session feel more coherent.
3 hours ago3 hr As long as there is the annoying 180 degree turn right at the gate, FSHud will only be used as a AI Traffic sky filler for my VFR flights, as it does not need an active simbrief FP, which is the huge plus imho compared to BATC e.g. For proper big hub to big hub flights I prefer BATC however exactly because BATC has pushbacks implemented for AI planes. Jetways dont connect with both sadly... but that is just me, I find the missing pushback THE immersion killer for FSHud. Other than that, it is great Greetings, Chris AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, 2x32GB DDR5 6000MT/s RAM, MSI RTX 4090 Ventus 3X, Windows 11 Home, MSFS2024
Create an account or sign in to comment