Jump to content

duckbilled

Bronze
  • Content Count

    2,556
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

289 Excellent

About duckbilled

  • Rank
    Member - 2,000+

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    The Arsenal of Democracy
  • Interests
    Aviation
    Travel
    Urban Planning
    GIS

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

7,903 profile views
  1. Since when? Navigraph is Jeppesen and MSFS is/was NAVBLUE. Did MSFS finally ditch NAVBLUE?
  2. Has FBW implemented this in the experimental version? I've always had trouble figuring out what features are included in each version.
  3. I think it is a good move, and I doubt they will start charging for it. I could see them adding premium features, but having Simbrief remain free could actually become a draw for paid Navigraph subscriptions.
  4. No. I set them up for the A320 and most of them transfer over to other aircraft. For example, I just loaded the DR400 - the wingviews work (R&L), but the behind wing (R&L) don't work and the FO view doesn't work, because neither of those views exist in the DR400. I selected the DR400 as an example, because I have never flown that aircraft.
  5. Finally purchased it, installed and hand flew a quick pattern around EDDF. Fist thing I noticed was that none of my views work. I have key commands set up for my wing views and cockpit views that work in all of the default aircraft. Almost none of them work with the CRJ. Anyone know what is happening and how to rectify it?
  6. I'm wondering the same thing but for an additional reason. If one purchases from the marketplace, will it be possible to install mods for the aircraft? How would things like addon sound packages be installed? What if we needed to change something like the parking codes? Is everything locked down and if so, is there a difference in the way the AS versions are encrypted?
  7. Yup. Please vote. This is the only way we will get realistic traffic in MSFS, and assisting AIG will make it possible for others to develop AI solutions as well. No offence to Asobo, but I don't think they will ever be able to achieve what we had in FSX, FS9 or P3D on their own.
  8. Love how we need 30 pages of posts to say the same things we say at every update, yet everyone is still confused because the thread is 30 pages long and the process confusing because MS/AS never provided step-by-step instructions for updating.
  9. I haven't been able to get the ILS to auto tune on my last few flights. I'm not sure what the common denominator is, but the frequency should automatically be in the MCDU after I enter the approach data. I landed in MMAA yesterday with the experimental FBW A320, and noting popped up even after I turned on the LS. Is this similar to the problem we had in FSX and P3D where some updated AFCADS didn't include the stock data?
  10. Is there a place where I can see a comparison of which features are available in each version (stable, experimental, dev)? I can never figure out which one I want to install. My biggest issue right now is how aircraft handle arrivals and approaches. I know the issue is with the sim, but I'd like to make sure I get the fixed version when it becomes available.
  11. Keep in mind that anything purchased from the Marketplace will by encrypted. As a result, you won't be able to edit any of the files down the road. Editing the ADE/AFCAD may be impossible. If you purchase direct, not only does the developer get a bigger cut, you'll be able to update the ADCAD, if needed.
  12. I do agree with you. My desire for the Caribbean and MX to be updated is related to the issues you listed. I'm far less interested in detailed POI's in Mexico City. In fact, I think stuff like that is pretty small potatoes and should be left to 3PD's. I think Asobo is probably contractually required to release these regional updates. No update = no paycheck.
  13. Caribbean and Mexico need a lot of work.
  14. I'll take a wait and see attitude towards the recompiling. We'll see how much of an inconvenience it really is. I do agree with those who would like a dialogue box or something. There really should be a status bar or something to let the user know that their computer is still processing something. Delivering anything without that is really bad design, IMO.
×
×
  • Create New...