ianb2469

I’ll have to look for that. I’ve added the drag/engine mod too until BB get that side improved. I’ve not used ACARS yet I’ve been re-familiarising myself with the aircraft. It’s a long time since the Level D 767!!!

I would really appreciate knowing this too. I use the Thrustmaster Boeing yoke with some mild curves that feel good with the PMDG 737 (-29% off the top of my head). I really like the 757 and can already feel it starting to mature!!

Just taken the RR variant from EGNT to LEPA. No crashes. I tuned my TCA yoke to -45 pitch and -40 roll based on a discord thread and it didn’t feel too bad at all. I pulled on stand with the exact fuel figure that the Simbrief profile from BB said I would which is also impressive (PMDG 738 I had to do a lot of trial and error with a fuel factor to get it close). Many of the 757 quirks I’d forgotten about since the Level D 767 days were there. Textures really up close aren’t amazing but at normal zoom it’s good. I bought via Justflight last night but due to night shift only installed today. No dramas there as long as you set the Nest app with the community folders. I’m looking forward to them perfecting this, and some painters making higher quality liveries. I got a refund when Fenix first released due to performance issues - and now I think Fenix is the peak of MSFS addons. I won’t be asking for a refund for this, and I’m excited to be here to watch it mature. Will fly it again tomorrow I think!!

I agree! But it’s difficult not to use such features when they’re available, especially for a 2hr video. Hence I said I’d not checked the details (as I can’t without watching it all).

I will watch the video in due course, likely in segments due the the length. I too will be flying the 757 for a while I think anyway. I asked Gemini to summarise below. I’ve not checked this for facts. This video is a comprehensive presentation by Fenix Simulations regarding Version 3.0 of their A320 product line, described as their largest and most significant update to date. Key areas of improvement and overhaul include: • Flight Model & Fly-By-Wire (03:38 - 07:17): Reworked for enhanced inertia handling using Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024's inertia tensor system, backported for 2020 users to improve the feel of rotation, flare, and ground handling. • EFB & Documents (11:24 - 13:32): The settings and documents apps have been overhauled to include a fully interactive quick reference handbook, searchable features, and customizable checklists. • Art & Sound (13:32 - 22:58): Implementation of a new physics-based animation system for flight deck components and a comprehensive update to soundscapes, including full Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) support. • CIDS & FAP (22:58 - 37:21): A deep-level simulation of the Cabin Intercommunication Data System (CIDS) and the enhanced Flight Attendant Panel (FAP), featuring a "Virtual Purser" that manages cabin events, announcements, and lighting. • ECAM & FWC (37:21 - 50:58): A complete rebuild of the Flight Warning Computer (FWC) and ECAM engine to emulate hardware-level timing, sensor delays, and specific failure modes, providing a more authentic experience. • FADEC (50:58 - 1:03:59): Extensive updates to engine control logic, allowing for accurate simulation of engine start sequences, failures, and system cross-talk (e.g., flex thrust validation). • LNAV/VNAV (1:03:59 - 1:46:54): A major overhaul of the FMS and vertical navigation. The update focuses on realistic managed descent behavior, including the implementation of "level segments" and complex DEL pseudo-waypoint logic, designed to address nuances often missing in other simulations. Final Thoughts (1:46:54 - end): The team emphasizes that while the previous version was functional, this update brings a significant move toward higher fidelity and polish, serving as a foundation for future developments and potential state-saving

I mean I’m buying it anyway but I agree. I spend zero time there. I have some wingctrl hardware already and was considering a PFP4 for this however I’m going to hold off for more details on the Wingflex kit too. If this jet is as good as I hope it is, I will likely fly nothing else.

Very interesting indeed! how does it handle callsigns for ATC units? For example the last time I tried BATC it referred to my base EGNT as “contact Newcastle approach departure” rather than “Newcastle radar” etc. little things really but jarring nonetheless

What’s the radar vectoring to the ILS like? And does it take you off the long (think Germany etc) published transitions onto vectors? Last time I tried BATC it wasn’t great at that….and I see a lot of hype about SI.

This will be one to visit in the 757!

Same. PPL but feel I can get a big chunk of the experience for far less cost (and risk!). Mostly fly airliners in MSFS mind you, and suffer the same thoughts re the atmosphere. Have been tempted many times by ActiveSky for the passive extras but always end up putting myself off. Quietly hoping one day we get a better atmosphere overall. I too have spent time in X Plane. Did some serious hours in X11 previous to MSFS launching. Shame we can’t have a hybrid of both!!

A good 737-300/400/500 would be amazing to have. But perhaps wishful thinking. Hopefully we’re about to have a very good 757. I agree a 747 doesn’t seem to make sense. 787 is a risk for them. Perhaps a 767 or 737CL? I’d like both!!

I’m hoping GCTS and KMIA will get hammered by me in a 757!

1) the 757 and it lives up to the hype 2) an LEAL scenery that is to today’s high standards. 3) a 737-300 made to Fenix standards.

I think I did that but it then put a random much higher number against the current waypoint, removed the T/D marker and placed a T/C one that I was never going to reach!! Will try again next flight.

So I’m having some Issues with this aircraft. The holds as already mentioned here or at the official forum don’t work properly, I also can’t seem to get the FMC to work if I change cruise level in flight, it messes various things up in the profile. I also can’t find a way to change the arrival/STAR/runway which is, alongside the above, something that must be possible for online flying. I could be doing something wrong though!

I’m an airline flyer. Does ActIve Sky have convective clouds? And will the wx radar on my 737 and Airbus display correctly? Something I’m increasingly frustrated with is the lack of proper convective clouds and weather especially in Europe in the summer!

Steering works fine for me with my rudder pedals, although feels over sensitive compared to PMDG and Fenix but that could be just something I have to get used to

My initial findings are that the rudder on the ground is too sensitive, and the auto throttle on final approach is no where near responsive enough, had to disengage it in, for EHAM standards were relatively light winds.

I think this was the reason on my first attempt today that I couldn’t get the engines started!!! All cleared for next attempt tomorrow morning as I ran out of time.

Has anyone noticed the FMC says F28 on the initial page. Not sure if that’s intentional or not?!

Several streamers/YouTubers in the next 24hrs (or already!) incl 330driver and Flightdeck2sim. It’s coming!!

A big wish of mine for this update (may sound petty but I know shared with many on discord) was for the flap axis to be like every other aircraft I own, so that I can use the detents on my Bravo provided by prosimdesk. Alas, no! Not sure why the axis seems “off” compared to everything else and there is no option to calibrate it either.

Are those still needed after the recent update. Not had chance to check yet.

This happens to me when I change views and refocus to the front view. I think only in 2024 though.

I’d love nothing more than to fly with realistic ATC all the time. What I see of SI on YouTube vids is that it’s still Americanised language a lot of the time in Europe. Beyond is getting there but vectors for approach are still not good. VATSIM is great but rarely that well staffed!