July 29, 201114 yr Author I have a very dumb and also very open question.I really wonder how some devs reach the goal of great optics (which this thing obviously has) and superb fps (which it has too) now. I'm sure it's a combination of things, but, not too long ago, everything with e. g. hires textures inevitably lead to a reduced performance.Now, releases like this one (it isn't the only one, don't worry) show that the magic of great looks and great fps can be achieved. How do they do that?As a side note, I once again have to praise the policy of e. g. giving the customers free updates.
July 29, 201114 yr How do they do that? Practice makes perfect! The pursuit of perfection! Maybe.... I have seen some FTX airports double in fps after an update release. Some devs are doing everything they can to improve what they offer their customers and I'm grateful. I wish I could contribute more "financially" to their success. MSFS
July 29, 201114 yr Bought this tonight! Its awesome, just flew out and upto KPDX, Going to fly back now :) Simon Roberts
July 29, 201114 yr I did the upgrade and applied the fix. However, I don't see any AI. What did I do wrong? I think I found the fix. It's a bgl file that has to be re-named. Just in case anyone has this issue. http://www.flightbeam.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=170 MSFS
July 30, 201114 yr Thank you for making the community aware. I find it daunting to keep up with all the releases and updates. This is definitely good news. Mike Keigley
July 30, 201114 yr It's really beautiful and FPS friendly. What else do you want, really?? I just installed in while it looks really great, what is with the dark area that now is present in the bay water that surrounds KSFO's south side. Also, I noticed the textures in the area just outside the airport look terribly blurry. I generally have super clear textures all over, so this looks weird. I guess these two issue are just the way the product blends in the existing textures, or could I have some sort of installation issue maybe. I did make sure FTX's configurator had me set to Default FSX before I installed KSFOX. Thoughts? Thanks in advance . . . Noel Noel System: 9900X3D Noctua NH-D15 G2, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL 64GB (2 x 32GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Front Edge Sync. Aircraft used in MSFS 2024: Fenix A320, Aerosoft CRJ, FBW, WT 787X, I-Fly 737 MAX 8, Citation Longitude.
July 30, 201114 yr Here's a peek. I already bought the software, but as nasty as the surrounding textures look I'm afraid I'm going to have to make this as donation. You can see the background look pretty clean and non-blurry, but the zone just outside the actual airport is horribly blurry by comparison. As mentioned, normally I enjoy crisp textures most of the time. Also, the very weird water on the south end looks pretty off. Hopefully you can expand these prints up to where you can see what I'm talking about with the textures close in to the airport. Tell me I'm doing something wrong! Noel System: 9900X3D Noctua NH-D15 G2, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL 64GB (2 x 32GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Front Edge Sync. Aircraft used in MSFS 2024: Fenix A320, Aerosoft CRJ, FBW, WT 787X, I-Fly 737 MAX 8, Citation Longitude.
July 31, 201114 yr The 1st version brought my PC to it's knees FPS wise,Can anyone with that issue confirm it's much better in V2.0?THX 100%75%50%d8a34be0e82d98b5a45ff4336cd0dddc Patrick
July 31, 201114 yr Moderator The 1st version brought my PC to it's knees FPS wise,Can anyone with that issue confirm it's much better in V2.0?THXI get about the same performance now that I got with the original version, which is very good ~25 to 35 FPS depending on a/c. In fact I get better FPS with the Flightbeam version than I do with the default FSX version.If you dont own it already just install it and run the trial version and see how it goes on your rig. Avsim Board of Directors | Avsim Forums Moderator
July 31, 201114 yr Author I double that, fps are better with the addon airport than with the default.
July 31, 201114 yr Fantastic news! Thanks very much! 100%75%50%d8a34be0e82d98b5a45ff4336cd0dddc Patrick
July 31, 201114 yr Commercial Member Noel, those blurry textures are NOT from the KSFO package. I don't know what other addons you've installed, but it's causing problems.
July 31, 201114 yr Moderator Wrong reply - deleted by me. Avsim Board of Directors | Avsim Forums Moderator
July 31, 201114 yr Noel, those blurry textures are NOT from the KSFO package. I don't know what other addons you've installed, but it's causing problems. Well, for areas that should affect the Bay Area, I have GEX-USA, UTX-NA, and REX2. At least you are telling me this issue I am experiencing IS NOT how KSFO should display, so that is good. These are programs just about everyone uses. As it is now, I pretty much need to uninstall KSFO as it really looks terrible, and the areas you see on those pics don't look that way until KSFO was installed. Any ideas? Should I try uinstalling KSFO, and reinstall? Is it possible I got a corrupted version of KSFO? I say this because the problem isn't there until I installed KSFO. Noel System: 9900X3D Noctua NH-D15 G2, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL 64GB (2 x 32GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Front Edge Sync. Aircraft used in MSFS 2024: Fenix A320, Aerosoft CRJ, FBW, WT 787X, I-Fly 737 MAX 8, Citation Longitude.
Create an account or sign in to comment