Hi, WoW, I just got it loaded and went to FSDT-KJFK. I'm getting 31.2 FPS, with 3 Samsung SyncMaster T260HD Monitors (5760x1200x32). Unbelievable Note: The screen shot, its been reduced from 5760x1200x32. I also cut and paste the FPS info so it would be easier to read.

Nice Mike

...and here you were complaining in the PMDG forum about their servers being down. Looks like you were one of the lucky ones.

Hi, I retain exactly what I said about the server issue. However, that has absolutely nothing to do with the product itself.

...and here you were complaining in the PMDG forum about their servers being down. Looks like you were one of the lucky ones.

Looking nice. Once I get off damn work then I can download her........

I don't want to know what kind of frames I'll hit if my PMDG 747 bang the fps limiter's wall at 40 FPS... :D Obviously 40 = ct :D

Can anyone tell me why certain 737's are configured with main panels missing the end pieces and others are not (expand the pic below and you'll see the area I circled)? Not comparing to iFly but rather many pics I've seen of the 737NG cockpit.

Good eye Dillon. Just looking at the NG cockpits I have been in that I have images of and they all have the end plate (five).

Nice shot. Nebojsa

you do realise Mike, that your configuration can easily be considered to be pretty high end, even for FS users normally! If i were to honestly invest that kind of money into a rig that equals or surpasses your specs, I would at the LEAST expect the kind of frames you said you get. Having said that, it's still a nice shot & good on you for the frames you're getting! :)

Hi, The reason I'm amazed with the PMDG offering is, I have many other aircraft, including a well known 767 and a recently released 737 that perform in the low twenties when it comes to FPS. To see this type of quality and attention to detail that is far superior to any other offering and see an increase in performance is simple amazing to me.

you do realise Mike, that your configuration can easily be considered to be pretty high end, even for FS users normally! If i were to honestly invest that kind of money into a rig that equals or surpasses your specs, I would at the LEAST expect the kind of frames you said you get. Having said that, it's still a nice shot & good on you for the frames you're getting! :)

First product I've seen that really tempts me toward fsx. Apart from the sheer detail and visual appeal, that kind of comparative performance speaks to a level of coding and modeling efficiency approaching wizardry!

I'm experiencing the same here. Very nice 31fps. But try turning left...

Hows performance with full AI + thunderstorm (or more than just one cloud layer) at JFK?

Can anyone tell me why certain 737's are configured with main panels missing the end pieces and others are not (expand the pic below and you'll see the area I circled)? Not comparing to iFly but rather many pics I've seen of the 737NG cockpit.

The chronometer controls are a customer option from the factory. Not all operators opt to get that option. Pretty simple really.