Hi guys, Iain, yea it seems like it has no windows at all I'm not sure who did this model I would be surprised if it was feelthere that made the visual 3d model but I have no clue. Im still waiting for them to show shots of the vc I will defiantly be buying the DA/Aerosoft crj as that one looks amazing but I might give this one a try if the other is delayed even more.

Feelthere hasn't produced a product that Wilco has published in a long time. I'm pretty sure ties are completely cut between the two entities.

Feelthere hasn't produced a product that Wilco has published in a long time. I'm pretty sure ties are completely cut between the two entities.

Yes that's true Zach so I wonder who they got for this model I guess will have to see when its released.

I didn't know that about Wilco and FT. I worry then if it's just Wilco behind this one. They're not know for super high quality stuff. My experience with FT has been so-so, though I do like their ERJ 175/195 series. I hope this will be a good one, because there really is not a good add-on of the CRJ out there.

Feelthere hasn't produced a product that Wilco has published in a long time. I'm pretty sure ties are completely cut between the two entities.

I don't think so. I thought according to both parties FT did the "mechanics" side of the 737 Evo that WILCO just released? I do not own the product but it sounds as if it was more than WILCO plugging the original gauges into Aeroplane Heaven's model.I don't think it is a good thing, having three parties involved (one distributor, two developers?). But, based on Aerosoft's issues with DA and their CRJ this might be the only offering for some time. I am very curious to see who is developing WILCO's.

Edited February 9, 201214 yr by Joe L

Looking forward to that one too, although I join in and declare the Aerosoft/Digital Aviation model to not only be looking top notch so far, but also aiming for that sweat spot.Joe is right, I think the last Wilco/Feelthere production was the V2 of the 737PIC. I think some Feelthere devs even stated that they did the gauges on that one. So perhaps the CRJ also adds to that list.

Edited February 9, 201214 yr by CoolP

So perhaps the CRJ also adds to that list.

feelThere has zero involvement in wilco's CRJ project.--

feelThere has zero involvement in wilco's CRJ project.--

Thank's for clearing that up Scoob I guess most of us always wonder when wilco releases something new we think feelthere might be involved but only because they have done allot of things together.

And the line between them has always been, and I suspect always will be, extremely fuzzy.

Hello guys hope you are doing well here's in update on the Wilco CRJ just checked wilco's site and it seems the release date is set for march for download version http://www.wilcopub....xtgen-6251.html no price yet at the store.DOWNLOADAvailability: Mar.30, 2012CD/DVDAvailability: Apr.30, 2012

Edited February 15, 201214 yr by Silverbird

feelThere has zero involvement in wilco's CRJ project.--

Hello ScoobWhat level is this CRJ, Fleet or PIC ?

Ha. That's the thing that gets me! The original Feelthere 737 PIC looks better then the new EVO.

Nonsense, I own both, can look at both models in FSX, and EVO is better, I didn't buy it because of peoplesaying things like this, but looking at some youtube clips I got suspicious and finally did buy it, thereis NO reason I'm sorry about it. There is NO finer 300/400/500 out there, I've flown it multiple flightsnow and had no problems.Its not PMDG, that's true, but its sure an improvement over a quickly imported FS2004 product thatI think the first one was. Making exaggerated claims like this hurts a provider to our hobby and ultimatelyhurts us all. I'm not saying there's no flaws, or things to dislike about it, but its still an improvementand I'm happy Wilco published it.PS Oh, and I should add, the frame rate on the EVO is amazing, much better rates than I geteven with PMDG, that's an unexpected plus :)

Edited February 15, 201214 yr by jfv

There are now a couple shots of the VC, they are small, but look pretty goodas far as you can tell. The old product does function, but on a 28" monitor at1920x1080 its SURE ugly, I'm really looking forward to this one as there's nosign of Aerosoft's. I'm also disappointed there's no 200, but I guess that willbe a reason to use XPlane :)

Making exaggerated claims like this hurts a provider to our hobby

And living in a dream world claiming this product is good and indeed better hurts us more, "if they buy crap we will sell them crap".Version 2 LOLOld Version 1

That livery sucks I agree, I've not used or seen it, but the one I DO use, SouthWest, looks betterthan the older. I often would not fly the old one at all due to the horrible framerates, now that isnot an issue.

...

Now that, is nonsense. If your standards are that low, that's fine. But calling my opinion nonsense (an opinion shared by the better half of the community) because of your low standards is the actual nonsense. Refer to post 28. Sawyer put his money where his mouth was. And won.The model is junk not good, the VC is especially junk not good. If you like it, I'm glad! But I don't, and I'll share that opinion.

Edited February 15, 201214 yr by ZachLW