December 11, 201213 yr Exploring Alaska in X-Plane. While individual trees don't look great the effect of having loads of them really gives the impression of a dense forest.
December 11, 201213 yr Commercial Member Wow. Nice. Btw what was a FPS number? 3? Current system: ASUS PRIME Z690-P D4, Intel 12900k, 32GB RAM @ 3600mhz, Zotac RTX 3090 Trinity, M2 SSD, Oculus Quest 2.
December 11, 201213 yr Author Wow. Nice. Btw what was a FPS number? 3? Nope - not that bad actually. Can't tell exactly for those screenshots but I tried to find a similar scenario and the worst i got was around 12-13 fps but usually a few fps higher (depending on altitude and viewing direction of course)
December 12, 201213 yr Looks nice, that default scenery in X Plane? For comparison, Tongass Fjord X addon in FSX I took recently. Click on image 2x to enlarge.
December 12, 201213 yr Deep,Rich Shots,X-Plane 10 gets better and better 100%75%50%d8a34be0e82d98b5a45ff4336cd0dddc Patrick
December 12, 201213 yr Author Looks nice, that default scenery in X Plane? More or less default. I used the HD Mesh which increases resolution of the underlying landclass data. In addition I used the experimental dense forest definition files from the same site. And dense it is indeed :lol:.
December 12, 201213 yr Author For comparison, Tongass Fjord X addon in FSX I took recently. Click on image 2x to enlarge. Nice screenshot there. Out of curiosity I tried to get as close as I could in X-Plane (bigger image here). Its a little to dark I think but its nice to see that the shape of the horizon is almost identical. It must be true then ^^.
December 13, 201213 yr I don't know what I'm doing wrong but I never get scenery like the pics above :( I never saw anything like these in my Tongass Fjord scenery :( It's so real - phenomenal. I run FS9, FSX and X-plane (not all at once) on an i7 Ivybridge 4.2 GHz, 680GTX 4 MB, 1900x1200 27in widescreen. I think there's plenty of horsepower there - am running fps around 30. I use Nvidia Inspector. Should I take up Photoshop? ^_^ John
December 14, 201213 yr Author That first shot looks too real. What is your gamma setting? Gamma setting is 2.2 (which is default I think). I don't know what I'm doing wrong but I never get scenery like the pics above :( I never saw anything like these in my Tongass Fjord scenery :( It's so real - phenomenal. I run FS9, FSX and X-plane (not all at once) on an i7 Ivybridge 4.2 GHz, 680GTX 4 MB, 1900x1200 27in widescreen. I think there's plenty of horsepower there - am running fps around 30. I use Nvidia Inspector. Should I take up Photoshop? ^_^ I'm not sure if you are referring to VeryBumpy or to me but for my pics I have done no editing other than downscaling.
December 14, 201213 yr I'm not sure if you are referring to VeryBumpy or to me but for my pics I have done no editing other than downscaling. Both, I guess. So, the situation re. my sim is even worse than I thought :( I've just landed in heavy mist at LFQQ. It was a slide-show. Something is obviously not right - not for this thread. Your screenshots are magnificent. Thanks for posting them. John
December 17, 201213 yr Yup, that is what forests are made of - lots and lots of trees. This is the first time I have seen a flightsim with a forest worthy of the name (except maybe Rise of Flight) - a real carpet of trees. Even the road is lost in there! Nice! Sascha Rieger | EVO Developer What is EVO • How to get Evo 2016 • FS9 Evolution Forum
Create an account or sign in to comment