The only Aircraft that has the correct fuel modeled at the moment is the PMDG 737-800 WL all the others can be modeled by yourself following the instructions in the manual.

I was one f hose complaining when the support dissapeard just after Christmas but since they have come back I've purchased and it is well worth the money IMO.

I had some weird flight plans across the Atlantic where sometimes it would export the NAT, sometimes it would not.  It basically varied with the city pairs.  There were some other bugs that I came across that were reported, but never fixed.  I ended up getting PPFX.

I had some weird flight plans across the Atlantic where sometimes it would export the NAT, sometimes it would not.  It basically varied with the city pairs.  There were some other bugs that I came across that were reported, but never fixed.  I ended up getting PPFX.

You don't say what version you were running or how long ago this was. The latest stable release was on the 1st of June and there is a new beta which was released on the 2nd so things are moving forward with them.

Brian, I'm really hoping you're right and that they will continue to improve it. I actually paid for it because I like the software by design, but they seem to be one of those developers that don't have their priorities straight. They need to focus on perfecting what they have for the benefit of the paying customers. Then they can look at expanding the features. They are simply cramming every possible feature they can think of into this program and leaving none of them working well.

I agree Adam, the latest weather add-on for X-Plane that they have included is probably very good although I don't have X-plane and I use ASN for weather, So yes I'd rather they concentrated on fixing the remaining bugs first and then bring in the other add-ons.

Certainly for the majority of the flying I do it works fine. I tend to only use the PMDG 737-800 and as I said before this one has had the fuel calculation modelled and seems to work well. planning has had a few weird routes thrown in but they are obvious when you look at them on the map and easy to ignore when either entering them into the FMS or when flying VFR.

I should add that people have modelled other aircraft Fuel rates and they are available in there for you to import, and apparently it is easy enough to create the models yourself although I've not tried this yet 

When I looked at the cost of EFASS compared to it's competitors it was a no brainer for me, I know you get what you pay for but EFASS really isn't that bad, and does encompass many of the things I require in my little FS World.

 

Yes it has bugs but what software doesn't and support doesn't always do things the way I would want them done, but then if I could do what they do maybe I'd have written my own version

I've purchase EFASS -- the cockpit preview feature is interesting!

can you update the navdata cyle and if so which one does it use?

You can,it will use both, I use navigraph and that works fine aerosoft is also catered for.

EFASS is pretty nice, still trying to learn how to use it. How do you use the weather injector on it so that it will inject it into X-Plane? In X-Plane do I turn the 'real weather' to off, in order to bypass its internal weather injector so that it can use EFASS's weather instead?

I got this and, have to say, it does seem impressive.  Seems geared for Europe flying?  I have it in the back of my mind to do more flying there once EU landclass comes out.  I wonder if it would be possible to integrate with SkyVector for charts in the US.

I got this and, have to say, it does seem impressive.  Seems geared for Europe flying?  I have it in the back of my mind to do more flying there once EU landclass comes out.  I wonder if it would be possible to integrate with SkyVector for charts in the US.

 

I'm currently flying around Australia and I've been using it for that. I've also been flying around Malaysia and that worked fine also.

I'm using it to fly in the US, seems to work pretty well, but a few strange problems. The path is off on the map compared to what my plane is following.

I'm using it to fly in the US, seems to work pretty well, but a few strange problems. The path is off on the map compared to what my plane is following.

A long way off? mine doesn't hug the line all the way (probably measurable in 10's of feet rather than miles) but then that could be down to the difference in mapping between the source for FSX?Xplane and whoever EFASS are using. 

mine is a bout 1.5-2 inches away from the line. hrmm could be that i'm not using the exact same route that efass gave me that's why. I probably enter it in wrong. Maybe an error on my part.

how does it differ  from  the avilasoft efb  much of  a difference?