March 4, 201511 yr Hang on just one dang minute... NO woodpigeon! lol ...and there better be a pogo stick ;-) Alaister Kay
March 4, 201511 yr i like it a lot, i presume the challenge, sounds of a 4 turbo prop, having the cockpit breathing and living will be just mind blowing. Welcome pmdg to xplane!! Lest hope we have it available soon. Manuel Merelles
March 4, 201511 yr Wow, a very complex aircraft, four throttles, four mixture controls, VOR/DME, ADF. It really looks great! Rodrigo Rossi
March 4, 201511 yr It sure looks beautiful, but somehow I get the impression that it's a testbed for PMDG to show off their skills to the XP fraternity - look what we can do! The DC-6 looks like a very intimidating and complex beast to tame, and oh-so esoteric and specialist. I hope that it appeals to the XP crowd. As part of that XP crowd, I can't say that it's my cup of tea; I have the Just Flight DC-6, and whilst I am not comparing one to the other, I will suggest that my JF DC-6 has been hangared for years, perhaps due lack of interest, or lack of interest and product sparkle. My question is this: Is this an accurate enough benchmark for PMDG to determine with fair accuracy the actual XP market? It is a very specialist product, with, I might venture, fairly limited appeal. Had PMDG announced that the product that they were porting across from FSX to XP was to be their highly fabled fairy tailed Dash-8 Q400, well then, that would be, as they say, an entirely different story. I'm not nay-saying, as no-one can deny that it looks stupendous, but this product is aimed squarely at radial engine aficionado's. Hope the smoke belching is accurate - here's hoping that PMDG will somehow recreate that sight, sound and, err, smell... Mr Fabio Lagattolla"It's better to be on the ground wishing you were flying, than flying but wishing you were on the ground!"
March 4, 201511 yr Commercial Member It sure looks beautiful, but somehow I get the impression that it's a testbed for PMDG to show off their skills to the XP fraternity - look what we can do! The DC-6 looks like a very intimidating and complex beast to tame, and oh-so esoteric and specialist. I hope that it appeals to the XP crowd. As part of that XP crowd, I can't say that it's my cup of tea; I have the Just Flight DC-6, and whilst I am not comparing one to the other, I will suggest that my JF DC-6 has been hangared for years, perhaps due lack of interest, or lack of interest and product sparkle. My question is this: Is this an accurate enough benchmark for PMDG to determine with fair accuracy the actual XP market? It is a very specialist product, with, I might venture, fairly limited appeal. Had PMDG announced that the product that they were porting across from FSX to XP was to be their highly fabled fairy tailed Dash-8 Q400, well then, that would be, as they say, an entirely different story. I'm not nay-saying, as no-one can deny that it looks stupendous, but this product is aimed squarely at radial engine aficionado's. Hope the smoke belching is accurate - here's hoping that PMDG will somehow recreate that sight, sound and, err, smell... All due respect, Fabio, you should really take time to get up to speed in a thread before jumping in 5 pages in. This has already been addressed as far back as page one: Matt- No- this is not an accurate statement- and your fears are founded in your misunderstanding of what we are doing, not in the reality of how we operate. I have said all along that we were working on a sandbox project in order to learn how to develop for Xplane. What better sandbox project than to take a project that we are already creating for the love of the airplane, and use that as our learning tool? Just this once give us the benefit of the doubt that we are pretty good at what we do- and we wouldn't invest tens of thousands of developer hours and the costs associated with development in order to "experiment with marketing numbers" on a platform.... That would be just plane... erm... plain foolish. Seriously- this isn't our first trip to the Rodeo... We know quite a bit of about the marketplace and where it stands- what we don't (or...didn't) know is how to take OUR core logic and move it into Xplane... and THAT is what this project is all about. Kyle Rodgers
March 4, 201511 yr Err, just like you, I felt the need to have my say so. There's no ruling to say that things cannot be uttered if they've been said before. Still, shows that at least I'm on the right lines. :-) All due respect, Fabio, you should really take time to get up to speed in a thread before jumping in 5 pages in. This has already been addressed as far back as page one: In fact, I'll say it again, I am not convinced about the product choice. XP'ers don't just fly anything, you know! Mr Fabio Lagattolla"It's better to be on the ground wishing you were flying, than flying but wishing you were on the ground!"
March 4, 201511 yr their highly fabled fairy tailed Dash-8 Q400 They would have made the legacy Dash-8s. "A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory." - Leonard Nimoy ASUS Prime Z270-K/Intel i7 7700k @ 4.7GHz/be quiet! Black Rock 3 Pro/EVGA Geforce GTX960 4GB/16 GB Crucial DDR4-2400 RAM Alexander Neugebauer
March 4, 201511 yr Commercial Member In fact, I'll say it again, I am not convinced about the product choice. XP'ers don't just fly anything, you know! Fabio, Did you even read what I just posted? RSR's commentary basically says the following: We created the plane to test bringing our methodology and code into a new environment (XP). We created the DC-6 because we're passionate about old planes big radials. We know how the market works Where, in any of that, says "we made it to sell it to a lot of people?" In fact it almost says the opposite: We made it because we wanted to make it, and needed something to test how we bring our logic onto a new platform. Kyle Rodgers
March 4, 201511 yr Couldn't remember, knew it was one of those. That might have been a better choice for some. Mr Fabio Lagattolla"It's better to be on the ground wishing you were flying, than flying but wishing you were on the ground!"
March 4, 201511 yr Hi Rob, I have Xplane but I am still hooked on FSX. I am actually excited to try this plane out in X-plane. Bilal Asif Khan
March 4, 201511 yr Very interesting..... Congrats to the PMDG Team on a complex project that looks extraordinary. I will add the DC-6B to my X-Plane hangar. Quite a feat to produce products for FSX, P3D and X-Plane available to the PC, MAC and Linux operating systems. A plus for the whole flight sim community. I will be looking forward to the B737NGX release for X-Plane. Jim Morgan
March 4, 201511 yr We created the plane to test bringing our methodology and code into a new environment (XP). We created the DC-6 because we're passionate about old planes big radials. We know how the market works Where, in any of that, says "we made it to sell it to a lot of people?" You didn't say that but you do realise that you've just increased the X-Plane fan base by quite a significant amount. Cheers, Chris Brand
March 4, 201511 yr Commercial Member XP'ers don't just fly anything, you know! Well, I think here speaks mainly your personal disappointment, but don't speak for everybody. At least I am very very happy about this choice. Mario Donick .:. vFlyteAir
Create an account or sign in to comment