October 22, 20178 yr Both. But if not both, pick the one that suits the type of flying you prefer, long haul or short/medium haul. Both are excellent. Edited October 22, 20178 yr by regis9 Typo Dave Current System (Running at 4k): ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F, Ryzen 7800X3D, RTX 5090, 55" Samsung Q80T, 64GB DDR5 6000 RAM, EVGA CLC 280mm AIO Cooler, Brunner CLS-E NG Yoke, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS & Stick, Thrustmaster TCA Quadrant & Add-on, VirtualFly Ruddo+, TQ6+ and Yoko+, GoFlight MCP-PRO and EFIS, Skalarki FCU and MCDU
October 22, 20178 yr Commercial Member Yeah, I'll echo that. Decide what sort of trips you want to fly and go from there. Chris Owner, Fulcrum Simulator Controls. fulcrumsim.com facebook.com/fulcrumsimulatorcontrols instagram.com/fulcrumsimulatorcontrols twitter.com/Fulcrum_SC
October 22, 20178 yr 18 minutes ago, regis9 said: Both. But if not both, pick the one that suites the type of flying you prefer, long haul or short/medium haul. Both are excellent. Agree, you cannot go wrong David Murden. MSFS • Fenix A320 • PMDG 737 • MG Honda Jet • 414 / TDS 750Xi • FS-ATC Chatter • FlyingIron Spitfire & ME109G • MG Honda Jet • • Fenix A320 Walkthrough PDF • Flightsim.to • DCS • A10c II • F-16c • F/A-18c • F-14 • (Others in hanger) • Supercarrier • Terrains = • Nevada NTTR • Persian Gulf • Syria • Marianas • • [email protected] All Cores HT ON • 32GB DDR4 3200MHz • RTX 3080 • TM Warthog HOTAS • TM TPR • Corsair Virtuoso XT with Dolby Atmos® • Samsung G7 32" 1440p 240Hz • TrackIR 5 & ProClip •
October 22, 20178 yr You can’t go wrong, but the v4 version of the A320 is proving to be very taxing on people systems. So if you’re a heavy 3rd party airport flyer, you may get more manageable performance from the 777. I get very good performance with the PMDG birds, but at 3rd party airports am 10-20 FPS in the A320 Eric Szczesniak
October 22, 20178 yr Author 52 minutes ago, ESzczesniak said: You can’t go wrong, but the v4 version of the A320 is proving to be very taxing on people systems. So if you’re a heavy 3rd party airport flyer, you may get more manageable performance from the 777. I get very good performance with the PMDG birds, but at 3rd party airports am 10-20 FPS in the A320 Really? What are your specs?
October 22, 20178 yr Totally different a/c. Impossible to compare. They are both excellent. It's up to you, which one atrracts you the most. However, the FSL Airbus is by far the most advanced and high-end aircraft the simming world has ever seen... No other a/c comes close. (Nope, no one) Cheers.
October 22, 20178 yr I been reading a lot about the fsl airbus and and theirs a lot of different opinions on the frame rates, most I have read is that it is rough on frame rates and I like to fly with at least 30% ai and detailed airports of course I have to be reasonable with the graphic sliders. Cesar Martinez AMD 7800X3D RTX5080 NZXT N7 B650E | G.Skill 32GB DDR5 Samsung 980 Pro 2TB | Crucial MX500 (2×) | Crucial P3 Plus Monitor: Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 QD-OLED
October 22, 20178 yr Author 14 minutes ago, joemiller said: Totally different a/c. Impossible to compare. They are both excellent. It's up to you, which one atrracts you the most. However, the FSL Airbus is by far the most advanced and high-end aircraft the simming world has ever seen... No other a/c comes close. (Nope, no one) Cheers. I keep hearing people say this but they never explain why Isn't PMDG pretty much the same to the real aircraft??
October 22, 20178 yr I run My PMDG 747,777.NGX settings with the A320, vsync on trippleB 30HZ 4K it hold 30fps as with the PMDG.s hard to say but can be a little harder but not 30% http://
October 22, 20178 yr 1 hour ago, ESzczesniak said: You can’t go wrong, but the v4 version of the A320 is proving to be very taxing on people systems. So if you’re a heavy 3rd party airport flyer, you may get more manageable performance from the 777. I get very good performance with the PMDG birds, but at 3rd party airports am 10-20 FPS in the A320 +1 Matt Wilson
October 22, 20178 yr 21 minutes ago, Mitch24 said: I keep hearing people say this but they never explain why Isn't PMDG pretty much the same to the real aircraft?? Yeah but the 320 feels like the real thing, while the 737 (i take the 737 because i've never been into a 777 or 747) feels a bit more... how can i put it... 'more plastic'. I mean it doesn't feel as realistic. Nobody explains why because it's really hard to put it into words - The simulation is there, it's faithful and bla bla bla, but it also goes that step further in bringing the immersion into your house. The sounds, the lighting, the environment it creates - It's stunning! CASE: Fractal Terra Silver CPU: AMD R5 7800X3D 5.0Ghz RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 GPU: nVidia RTX 4070 Ti SUPER · SSDs: Samsung 990 PRO 2TB M.2 PCIe · PNY XLR8 CS3040 2TB M.2 PCIe · VIDEO: LG-32GK650F QHD 32" 144Hz FREE/G-SYNC · MISC: Thrustmaster TCA Airbus Joystick + Throttle Quadrant · MSFS2024 · Windows 11
October 22, 20178 yr Simple really. The 777 is 34 FPS One guy even posted the FSL Wrecked his P3D....well it turned out to be his PC was clogged up with dust. Good PC running well see below. On 17/10/2017 at 9:44 PM, Nyxx said: OK here is a like for like test. The hardest hitting FPS gate I know within P3D = Aerosofts EGLL Gate 539, facing all the airport and London. No AI, NO weather. Setting I use. PMDG NG = Can see in screenshot 36 FPS FSL A320 = 32 FPS David Murden. MSFS • Fenix A320 • PMDG 737 • MG Honda Jet • 414 / TDS 750Xi • FS-ATC Chatter • FlyingIron Spitfire & ME109G • MG Honda Jet • • Fenix A320 Walkthrough PDF • Flightsim.to • DCS • A10c II • F-16c • F/A-18c • F-14 • (Others in hanger) • Supercarrier • Terrains = • Nevada NTTR • Persian Gulf • Syria • Marianas • • [email protected] All Cores HT ON • 32GB DDR4 3200MHz • RTX 3080 • TM Warthog HOTAS • TM TPR • Corsair Virtuoso XT with Dolby Atmos® • Samsung G7 32" 1440p 240Hz • TrackIR 5 & ProClip •
October 22, 20178 yr Author I'm thinking about getting the A320, but from what i'm getting the performance is rubbish
October 22, 20178 yr 19 minutes ago, Mitch24 said: I keep hearing people say this but they never explain why For me, the sound is incredible. I own all three PMDG 7XXs and they don't even come close when it comes to sound. Ground Handling/Taxi in the A320X is the second to none. The PMDG's seem 'floaty' and it's like theres no weight to them, not so in the A320X. The Majestic Q400 comes a close second here. The FBW system in the A320X 'feels' amazing (granted, I've never experienced the real one, only read Airbus docs) but it acts exactly as you would expect and it's really easy to hand-fly. Autoflight is also smooth and precise and once you know your FMAs, it all becomes really intuitive (get hold of an Airbus A320 FCTM and read though it, it's only a couple of hundred pages but it's a brilliant primer for the A320X) This is something PMDG wins on. Documentation (which makes sense, given their roots) Now, don't get me wrong, I still love the PMDG stuff. I'll jump into the NGX again when I want a change and the 747 when I want something long-haul (not such a fan of the 777 to be honest) but the A320X replaced the NGX as my 'main' for the foreseeable future. Neil Andrews. Fight or Flight - YouTube | Twitter
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.