February 27, 20188 yr I am thinking of buying this airport as for me it links CYYZ-Midway- KMSP I see it's got a patch for v4, I don't expect it to be as amazing as there new work, but what's it like? Looks and FPS wise? Edited February 27, 20188 yr by Nyxx David Murden. MSFS • Fenix A320 • PMDG 737 • MG Honda Jet • 414 / TDS 750Xi • FS-ATC Chatter • FlyingIron Spitfire & ME109G • MG Honda Jet • • Fenix A320 Walkthrough PDF • Flightsim.to • DCS • A10c II • F-16c • F/A-18c • F-14 • (Others in hanger) • Supercarrier • Terrains = • Nevada NTTR • Persian Gulf • Syria • Marianas • • [email protected] All Cores HT ON • 32GB DDR4 3200MHz • RTX 3080 • TM Warthog HOTAS • TM TPR • Corsair Virtuoso XT with Dolby Atmos® • Samsung G7 32" 1440p 240Hz • TrackIR 5 & ProClip •
February 27, 20188 yr I have and it works well in 4.2 and looks nice as well. My specs look similar to yours, so you should be OK. Rick Abshier 5900X | RTX 5070 Ti OC| 64 GB@3600 | India Pale Ale
February 27, 20188 yr I like it, looks good (let’s be honest - even FlyTampa’s older stuff generally looks really good) and it’s a fun airport to fly into with short runways and little margin for error. Dave Current System (Running at 4k): ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F, Ryzen 7800X3D, RTX 5090, 55" Samsung Q80T, 64GB DDR5 6000 RAM, EVGA CLC 280mm AIO Cooler, Brunner CLS-E NG Yoke, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS & Stick, Thrustmaster TCA Quadrant & Add-on, VirtualFly Ruddo+, TQ6+ and Yoko+, GoFlight MCP-PRO and EFIS, Skalarki FCU and MCDU
February 27, 20188 yr Author Thanks guys sounds good. David Murden. MSFS • Fenix A320 • PMDG 737 • MG Honda Jet • 414 / TDS 750Xi • FS-ATC Chatter • FlyingIron Spitfire & ME109G • MG Honda Jet • • Fenix A320 Walkthrough PDF • Flightsim.to • DCS • A10c II • F-16c • F/A-18c • F-14 • (Others in hanger) • Supercarrier • Terrains = • Nevada NTTR • Persian Gulf • Syria • Marianas • • [email protected] All Cores HT ON • 32GB DDR4 3200MHz • RTX 3080 • TM Warthog HOTAS • TM TPR • Corsair Virtuoso XT with Dolby Atmos® • Samsung G7 32" 1440p 240Hz • TrackIR 5 & ProClip •
February 27, 20188 yr Does it have moving jetways? Ron Hamilton "95% is half the truth, but most of it is lies, but if you read half of what is written, you'll be okay." __ Honey Boo Boo's Mom
February 27, 20188 yr SWA hub... great airport, great scenery... Good airport to use PMDG 737. i do typically get 2-3 five second pauses on approach there... just figure it’s due to FT-KMDW, FSDT-KORD, and Orbx Meigs being in such close proximity. i7 6700K @ 4.6GHz, ASUS Z170-PRO GAMING, 32GB DDR4 2666MHz, 750W EVGA SuperNOVA, 512GB Samsung 960 PRO, 1TB Western Digital - Black Edition RTX 2080Ti (MSI trio), Corsair H115i - 280mm Liquid CPU Cooler
February 27, 20188 yr FlyTampa Midway works well. Drzewicki Designs (spelling) has a Chicago and area airports in the works that I expect will be a cleaner/newer version (as well as a lot of other surrounding airports). May not be a lot better thanm FlyTampa, but it’s something out there. Eric Szczesniak
February 27, 20188 yr MDW is my home airport, so naturally, this was the first scenery I purchased back in 2016. It works well in 4.2 as long as you apply the patch. Welcome to Chicago.
February 27, 20188 yr Works well for me. Busiest square mile on earth. Amazes me the traffic density at that little airport, short runways surrounded by residential areas. Pray not but any accident-incident there would be catastrophic. Just no room for error. Vic green
February 27, 20188 yr It installs and works great in P3d V4.2 but as other have said, one needs to download the patch and install that also. Performance is on the low side, maybe one of the bottom two or three airports that I have installed. But that makes sense. The airport has a lot of AI traffic and it's located in the densely populated urban area with tons of urban autogen and AI freeway traffic. I have DD NYC Airports and although they are nice, the Fly Tampa products in general are a bit better IMO. Of the "biggies" I'd go: Flightbeam>FSDT>FlyTampa>LatinVFR>DD>Aerosoft but the differences in both quality and performance are not all that great within that complete spectrum. All those developers have the same tools and techniques at their disposal and each sticks to a pretty high standard, unlike the add-on aircraft side of things where there is a wide range in quality,with airports the differences lie in the quality of support and how often the developer updates the airport to keep things synced with the real world. With that as a yardstick, one might drop FlyTampa a bit down the list. Edited February 27, 20188 yr by jabloomf1230
February 28, 20188 yr FlyTampa KBOS moved them up in the hierarchy in my opinion. Extremely well done. Ken Thompson i7-4790 @4 GHz 64 Bit Win 7 16G RAM GTX 1080Ti
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.