GSalden

Does Aerosoft know more ....

Recommended Posts

Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

Mathijs Kok: We have absolutely nothing to comment or say about this. Sorry.

That says it all really. N.D.A.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

4 minutes ago, simmerhead said:

Mathijs Kok: We have absolutely nothing to comment or say about this. Sorry.

That says it all really. N.D.A.

Yup, nothing is quite as official as something that's been offically denied.  😜

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, I could say that exact same thing... and then you'd think I was under NDA and knew more... but.... am I? Do I?

  • Like 6
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, WarpD said:

Of course, I could say that exact same thing... and then you'd think I was under NDA and knew more... but.... am I? Do I?

He unlocked the thread that was already locked with no further explanation to say that. 

This and also the AS (Aerosoft?!) on the registrations of the aircrafts. LOL

But again, right now we are just having some fun trying to guess things, nothing to take too serious.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, WarpD said:

Of course, I could say that exact same thing... and then you'd think I was under NDA and knew more... but.... am I? Do I?

You could, but you're not Mathijs Kok...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We will have no comment on whether we will either confirm or deny the existence of a supposed agreement to enter into an agreement to not disclose something which we may or may not be involved with regarding a company which we will not comment on. 😁

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find this so funny.

Trust me when I say, no developers in the flying sim community has or had any idea of this coming out.

And at this stage we are still unclear if MS will or not provide some sort of SDK to allow us to develop for this simulator, even if they do, we don't even know how deep or not the SDK could be.

Now think about, the product is still under development, it means even if they wish to provide some sort of SDK it cannot be completed and available to anybody to develop for this.

Therefore, Mathis statement is quite accurate, there is nothing to say about it as nobody has a clue about at this stage. You guys are reading too much into it.

Simbol.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, simbol said:

I find this so funny.

Trust me when I say, no developers in the flying sim community has or had any idea of this coming out.

And at this stage we are still unclear if MS will or not provide some sort of SDK to allow us to develop for this simulator, even if they do, we don't even know how deep or not the SDK could be.

Now think about, the product is still under development, it means even if they wish to provide some sort of SDK it cannot be completed and available to anybody to develop for this.

Therefore, Mathis statement is quite accurate, there is nothing to say about it as nobody has a clue about at this stage. You guys are reading too much into it.

Simbol.

Don’t agree with you on this one. AS has stated several years back that they were developing their own Flightsim, which then died a silent dead...

Mathijs is making Fog while a simple “No, we have nothing to do with it “ would be quiet accurate .... if that was the case.. 🤨

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, simbol said:

I find this so funny.

Trust me when I say, no developers in the flying sim community has or had any idea of this coming out.

And at this stage we are still unclear if MS will or not provide some sort of SDK to allow us to develop for this simulator, even if they do, we don't even know how deep or not the SDK could be.

Now think about, the product is still under development, it means even if they wish to provide some sort of SDK it cannot be completed and available to anybody to develop for this.

Therefore, Mathis statement is quite accurate, there is nothing to say about it as nobody has a clue about at this stage. You guys are reading too much into it.

Simbol.

I don't trust you :) 

There were external developers involved in FS9 and FSX, long before any official SDK existed. FSDT made the F/A-18 for instance, and I know people who made scenery, coded gauges and lots of other stuff, that weren't members of ACES. But even to this day very few of them speak of their involvement in writing because Microsoft's legal department is not something you want to mess with. 

That being said - nobody knows who knows except for those who do.

  • Upvote 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Airbus cockpit shot in the MS2020 teaser video isn't even the Aerosoft Professional so I don't see why everyone thinks it's Aerosoft. The ND displays don't even move when the plane is pushed back from the gate.  

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Wise87 said:

The Airbus cockpit shot in the MS2020 teaser video isn't even the Aerosoft Professional so I don't see why everyone thinks it's Aerosoft. The ND displays don't even move when the plane is pushed back from the gate.  

Correct, I am glad to see someone else catching these little details 😉.

Regards,

Simbol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Wise87 said:

The Airbus cockpit shot in the MS2020 teaser video isn't even the Aerosoft Professional so I don't see why everyone thinks it's Aerosoft. The ND displays don't even move when the plane is pushed back from the gate.  

Surely you will not see FSX/XP/P3D aircraft in the new Sim. It is a little bit naive to think that.

This is a new engine so none of our “simple” AC will work. This is far more advanced ...

Edited by GSalden
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GSalden said:

Surely you will not see FSX/XP/P3D aircraft in the new Sim. It is a little  bit Mauve to think that.

This is far more advanced ...

As far as we know It could be FSlabs too haha, I don't get why people assume it is Aerosoft so quickly.

But it is great publicity for them, which might be very good, they work hard so at least they can get extra attention from this 😊.

Regards,

Simbol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, simbol said:

As far as we know It could be FSlabs too haha, I don't get why people assume it is Aerosoft so quickly.

Because it uses the same incorrect font they use.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sethos said:

Because it uses the same incorrect font they use.

I see, so nobody else can use the same font? 😉.

S.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, simbol said:

I see, so nobody else can use the same font? 😉.

S.

 

Considering it's their own custom, proprietary font, no, they most likely can't.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sethos said:

Considering it's their own custom, proprietary font, no, they most likely can't.

How are you so certain it is that font? Could it not be Airbus uses characters in that shape, Aerosoft developed its own font to replicated it and now MS has also done the same in order to also replicated it? The results are both fonts looks the same as Airbus fonts.

😉

S.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, simbol said:

How are you so certain it is that font? Could it not be Airbus uses characters in that shape, Aerosoft developed its own font to replicated it and now MS has also done the same in order to also replicated it? The results are both fonts looks the same as Airbus fonts.

😉

S.

Because it's a well-known issue with the Aerosoft birds, going back years. They have a very unique, custom made font that is also wrong. It's not accurate to the 320. Would be a bit of a miracle if a completely different developer managed to nail the exact same inaccuracies.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is everyone going to be turning themselves inside out about this for the next year until the product arrives?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, DavidP said:

Is everyone going to be turning themselves inside out about this for the next year until the product arrives?

Yes.

 

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, DavidP said:

Is everyone going to be turning themselves inside out about this for the next year until the product arrives?

Yes.

All rational behaviour and reason to go out of the window.
(Nothing new there).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, irrics said:

It is good to see the avionics working correctly at the 57 second mark

But is not an Airbus, so for some it doesn't matter :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now