October 27, 20205 yr Good day Is this possible : Take of from an airfield with no flight plan loaded in the sim. Once airborne then do "DIRECT TO" to another airport - say 50 miles away. I know the MSA and climb to that altitude. Whilst en route to destination airport can one load and and activate an approach for the destination airport ?. I have tried with no success. Maybe I need more G1000 knowledge. I do have the latest Working Title G1000 mod installed. Thank you Intel i7 - 9700K @ 3.60 GHz | Asus RTX 3080 | 32 GB RAM | Saitek ProFlight Yoke System and Rudder Pedals | X-Touch Mini | Honeycomb Bravo TQ
October 27, 20205 yr It absolutely should be possible. Whether you can do it in the sim or not I don’t know. But in real life, absolutely.
October 27, 20205 yr 24 minutes ago, SAPilot said: Good day Is this possible : Take of from an airfield with no flight plan loaded in the sim. Once airborne then do "DIRECT TO" to another airport - say 50 miles away. I know the MSA and climb to that altitude. Whilst en route to destination airport can one load and and activate an approach for the destination airport ?. I have tried with no success. Maybe I need more G1000 knowledge. I do have the latest Working Title G1000 mod installed. Thank you I have not had success either. It just refuses to load the approaches of the airport you have in the D> function. I've pretty much given up on trying to make the G1000/ any GPS work as its real world counterpart and rely on my Navigraph subscription with the charts and geo-referenced aircraft icon that basically makes it the nav part of the G1000 with me at the controls, being the autopilot portion of the system. 🙂 While the gang at Working Title have made tremendous improvements to it, I think they will eventually hit the same wall @RXP and others have at this point until MS/AS decide to do their part and finish that section of the SDK and/or incorporate the code within the sim to let Working Title gurus go on an Easter egg hunt to find and conquer. 😉 To me, probably the top item to be addressed in the sim at the moment. Regards, Steve DraGet my paints for MSFS planes at flightsim.to here, and iFly 737s hereDownload my FSX, P3D paints at Avsim by clicking here
October 27, 20205 yr 20 minutes ago, Steve Dra said: To me, probably the top item to be addressed in the sim at the moment. +1 Frank Patton Corsair 5000D Airflow Case; MSI B650 Tomahawk MOB; Ryzen 7 7800 X3D CPU; ASUS RTX 4080 Super; NZXT 360mm liquid cooler; Corsair Vengeance 64GB DDR5 4800 MHz RAM; RMX850X Gold PSU;; ASUS VG289 4K 27" Display; Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo, Crosswind 3's w/dampener. Former USAF meteorologist & ground weather school instructor. AOPA Member #07379126 "I will never put my name on a product that does not have in it the best that is in me." - John Deere
October 27, 20205 yr 26 minutes ago, Steve Dra said: I have not had success either. It just refuses to load the approaches of the airport you have in the D> function. I've pretty much given up on trying to make the G1000/ any GPS work as its real world counterpart and rely on my Navigraph subscription with the charts and geo-referenced aircraft icon that basically makes it the nav part of the G1000 with me at the controls, being the autopilot portion of the system. 🙂 While the gang at Working Title have made tremendous improvements to it, I think they will eventually hit the same wall @RXP and others have at this point until MS/AS decide to do their part and finish that section of the SDK and/or incorporate the code within the sim to let Working Title gurus go on an Easter egg hunt to find and conquer. 😉 To me, probably the top item to be addressed in the sim at the moment. For what it's worth, and given that I don't really know my way around the G1000, I found the G3000 infinitely more usable, and really perfectly fine thus far.
October 27, 20205 yr 20 minutes ago, mtr75 said: For what it's worth, and given that I don't really know my way around the G1000, I found the G3000 infinitely more usable, and really perfectly fine thus far. Agree for the most part...and I know that even if all the functionality was there, I probably would only use a small percentage of its capabilities. Thus far for me, all default GPS systems have only been "adequate" when I supplement my navigation needs as describe in my last post, but only because I know to expect only those things. The G3000 is better overall, as you don't have to constantly try to put 100% attention on grabbing an inner dial and rotate like crazy while you have a moment of calm air, waiting any moment for a bump to knock your curser to the outer knob and destroy the fix/airport/freq you've been trying to dial in. 😞 A keypad with the G1000 would make it X times better, and its pretty sad that the Cirrus has one, but its inop (The last I checked). Anyway, I patiently wait for the improbable where MS/AS addresses it in-sim, and let's Working Title make it 50-70% (or more hopefully) replicate the real-world counterpart, or our intrepid payware devs grab the reigns and deliver GTN goodness that I've become 100% comfortable using in GA aircraft (to me by far the friendliest, most intuitive UI...vastly superior to the Gx series logic IMO) Edited October 27, 20205 yr by Steve Dra Regards, Steve DraGet my paints for MSFS planes at flightsim.to here, and iFly 737s hereDownload my FSX, P3D paints at Avsim by clicking here
October 27, 20205 yr What I have found is that the way it should work doesn't work. You should be able to hit direct-to and do all that you said. What I found that makes it work is to add a fake starting airport and your destination into the flight plan, and then you can load the approach. Just find a nearby airport and enter that in as your starting point (regardless of whether you actually plan on flying there). If you use direct-to, you'll see your starting point as "USER" which doesn't work. Plug in a nearby airport instead as your from and things work a lot better. You shouldn't have to do this of course, but it does seem to work (at least for me). ------------------------- Craig from KBUF
October 27, 20205 yr 53 minutes ago, Steve Dra said: Agree for the most part...and I know that even if all the functionality was there, I probably would only use a small percentage of its capabilities. Thus far for me, all default GPS systems have only been "adequate" when I supplement my navigation needs as describe in my last post, but only because I know to expect only those things. The G3000 is better overall, as you don't have to constantly try to put 100% attention on grabbing an inner dial and rotate like crazy while you have a moment of calm air, waiting any moment for a bump to knock your curser to the outer knob and destroy the fix/airport/freq you've been trying to dial in. 😞 A keypad with the G1000 would make it X times better, and its pretty sad that the Cirrus has one, but its inop (The last I checked). Anyway, I patiently wait for the improbable where MS/AS addresses it in-sim, and let's Working Title make it 50-70% (or more hopefully) replicate the real-world counterpart, or our intrepid payware devs grab the reigns and deliver GTN goodness that I've become 100% comfortable using in GA aircraft (to me by far the friendliest, most intuitive UI...vastly superior to the Gx series logic IMO) Yeah, I have a good amount of real-world time behind the GTN650/750 as well, and you would think moving up the G1000 would at least be in some way logical or intuitive, but it's just not. Perhaps the reason why I've found the G3000 to be more functional is that it's just more logical, or perhaps it's the keyboard in the TBM. It's just way easier to use than the G1000.
October 27, 20205 yr 7 minutes ago, kerosene31 said: What I have found is that the way it should work doesn't work. You should be able to hit direct-to and do all that you said. it's what I've been saying since release, first you can't activate vector to final, and second it's because half the rnav data is missing. You can do a D> but you have to eh.... how should I put it, "make pretend" for the rest. Ryzen 5 5600X - Noctua U12A, 32Gb Vengence, Sapphire Pulse 5700xt, WD Black SN750 NVMe SSD
October 27, 20205 yr 1 minute ago, mtr75 said: It's just way easier to use than the G1000. it's also easier when I replace the G1000 with the G3X in the 172 and 208. Ryzen 5 5600X - Noctua U12A, 32Gb Vengence, Sapphire Pulse 5700xt, WD Black SN750 NVMe SSD
October 27, 20205 yr Just now, FPStewy said: it's also easier when I replace the G1000 with the G3X in the 172 and 208. How do you do that?
October 27, 20205 yr 4 hours ago, mtr75 said: Yeah, I have a good amount of real-world time behind the GTN650/750 as well, and you would think moving up the G1000 would at least be in some way logical or intuitive, but it's just not. Actually, the real G1000 is logical and you would have no trouble using it. As mentioned above, the MSFS G1000 has multiple bugs, and while the WorkingTitle folks are doing their best... the unit is still close to unusable, except as a very nice moving map, at least at present. 🙂 Bert
October 27, 20205 yr In Real Life there seems to be contradictory instructions: Here is what the G1000 Cessna Nav PDF says on page 2-42: Select Approach Select Approach allows the pilot to choose a published instrument approach for the destination airport or replace the current approach with a new selection. To select an approach for a direct-to or flight plan destination airport: 1. From an active flight plan, press the PROC key to display the Procedures options window. Activate Approach Activate Approach allows the pilot to activate the approach when ready to begin navigating the approach course (cleared for the approach). To activate the approach for a direct-to or flight plan destination airport: 1. From an active flight plan, press the PROC key to display the Procedures options window. HOWEVER ! Page 2-40 says: Load Approach Load Approach allows the pilot to select a published instrument approach for the destination airport, or replace the current approach with a new selection.To select an approach for a direct-to or flight plan destination airport: 1. From the Flight Plan Window, press the MENU key to display the page menu options. 2. Turn the FMS knob to highlight ‘Load Approach’, then press the ENT key. A window appears listing the available approaches for the destination airport. 3. Turn the FMS knob to select the desired approach, then press the ENT key. A window appears listing the available transitions for the approach. 4. Turn the FMS knob to select the desired transition or vectors, then press the ENT key. NOTE: The ‘Vectors’ option assumes that the pilot will receive vectors from ATC to the final course segment of the approach. 5. With ‘LOAD?’ highlighted, press the ENT key to load the approach. 6. To activate the approach, turn the large FMS knob to highlight ‘ACTIVATE?’, then press the ENT key. Nothing in the above states a Flight Plan has to be active for the Direct To AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D / MSI X870 Tomahawk Mobo / 64 GB DDR5 memory / RTX 4070 Super with 12 GB VRAM / AORUS FO48U 4k display NVMe for Drive C, an NVMe device dedicated to Flight Sim 2024 and a separate NVMe device for Flight Sim 2020 and an NVMe dedicated to 500GB of addons managed by AddonsLinker / 1 GB Comcast Xfinity Internet connection / HP Reverb G2 / Tobii 5 Head & Eye Tracking
October 27, 20205 yr 54 minutes ago, TacomaSailor said: Nothing in the above states a Flight Plan has to be active for the Direct To There are multiple ways of accomplishing this in the real unit, and THEY ALL WORK. That is the difference with the MSFS G1000.. Bert
October 27, 20205 yr I'm here waiting for the fantastic GTN750..........be waiting a while though 😀 Thomas Derbyshire
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.