February 26, 20215 yr There’s an article on the preview over at FSElite. I’m curious how closely these will follow the Arrow III release as I may just skip the Arrow III knowing that these are inbound. I tend to enjoy the faster GA aircraft... Dave Current System (Running at 4k): ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F, Ryzen 7800X3D, RTX 5090, 55" Samsung Q80T, 64GB DDR5 6000 RAM, EVGA CLC 280mm AIO Cooler, Brunner CLS-E NG Yoke, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS & Stick, Thrustmaster TCA Quadrant & Add-on, VirtualFly Ruddo+, TQ6+ and Yoko+, GoFlight MCP-PRO and EFIS, Skalarki FCU and MCDU
February 26, 20215 yr Looks good! Only sad that the simulation of turbocharged engines in MSFS is just as bad/unrealistic as it was in FSX and P3D. Greetings Tim My files on Flightsim.to i5 12600K | 32Gb | RTX 4080
February 26, 20215 yr 1 hour ago, Tim-HH said: Looks good! Only sad that the simulation of turbocharged engines in MSFS is just as bad/unrealistic as it was in FSX and P3D. Yes that appears to be the case. | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
February 26, 20215 yr They can’t be far off release because they have now officially announced their Hawk for MSFS is well in development. Ryzen 9800X3D, RTX 5090, 64GB, Win 11. MSFS2020. Moza, MFG, Fulcrum & Virpil controllers. Quest 3 for VR.
February 27, 20215 yr Isn't the Turbo III just marginally faster than the non-turbo and only really needed when doing higher altitude flying? James
February 27, 20215 yr Taking into account how bad the turboprop simulation is in msfs i just dont know how much sense it will make to get the turbo arrow. I think the naturally aspirated arrow will be more realistic. Juan Ramos
February 27, 20215 yr 12 minutes ago, xender said: Taking into account how bad the turboprop simulation is in msfs i just dont know how much sense it will make to get the turbo arrow. I think the naturally aspirated arrow will be more realistic. And probably easier to land, too. 🤣 Edited February 27, 20215 yr by Chock Alan Bradbury Check out my youtube flight sim videos: Here
February 27, 20215 yr 40 minutes ago, xender said: Taking into account how bad the turboprop simulation is in msfs i just dont know how much sense it will make to get the turbo arrow. I think the naturally aspirated arrow will be more realistic. Two totally different things turbo prop - jet turbine with a propeller bolted on turbo normalised - piston plane with a turbo charger boost to get better performance at altitude The Turbo Arrows is NOT a turbo prop it is a piston engine plane with a turbocharger. THIS is a turbo prop ... jet engine > gearbox > propellor Edited February 27, 20215 yr by Glenn Fitzpatrick
February 27, 20215 yr Unless it's like the turbo on the Lionheart TB-21, which doesn't appear to make a lot of difference. 🙁 Be interesting to see if it rotates differently though with that T-tail. I must admit, it'd be funny to see a PT-6 bolted onto a Cherokee though. 😮 Edited February 27, 20215 yr by Chock Alan Bradbury Check out my youtube flight sim videos: Here
February 27, 20215 yr 6 minutes ago, Chock said: Unless it's like the turbo on the Lionheart TB-21, which doesn't appear to make a lot of difference. 🙁 Be interesting to see if it rotates differently though. No idea about the Trinidad, but generally speaking the turbo chargers or in some cases multi stage superchargers on aircraft are not meant to give a substantial performance increase at ground level they are meant to counteract the drop off in performance at higher altitudes and increase the operational ceiling of the aircraft. Turbo-props, which are modelled very poorly in MSFS at present, are a totally different kettle of fish. They are basically a jet engine with a gearbox and prop on the front. Horsepower from a turbo prop can be insane compared to a piston engine. Many turbo pop ag planes for example have more HP than a WWII Spitfire or P51 . Edited February 27, 20215 yr by Glenn Fitzpatrick
February 27, 20215 yr 9 minutes ago, Glenn Fitzpatrick said: No idea about the Trinidad, but generally speaking the turbo chargers or in some cases multi stage superchargers on aircraft are not meant to give a substantial performance increase at ground level they are meant to counteract the drop off in performance at higher altitudes and increase the operational ceiling of the aircraft. Yup. Which doesn't really happen with that TB-21 unfortunately, it has trouble climbing much past 20,000, whereas it should be able to get up another few thousand feet as the real thing can with that turbocharger, although some people have allegedly tweaked the config file to make it happen. Hopefully when the patch which tweaks the air mass simulation in MSFS arrives, we might see a turbo acting more like the real thing though, although technically, it might help superchargers more than turbochargers. Edited February 27, 20215 yr by Chock Alan Bradbury Check out my youtube flight sim videos: Here
February 27, 20215 yr 8 hours ago, Glenn Fitzpatrick said: Two totally different things turbo prop - jet turbine with a propeller bolted on turbo normalised - piston plane with a turbo charger boost to get better performance at altitude The Turbo Arrows is NOT a turbo prop it is a piston engine plane with a turbocharger. Ohhh you're right., my bad. So the turbo arrow wont have a screwed engine simulation then? In that case i may need to get both 🙄😔 Juan Ramos
February 27, 20215 yr Between JF & Carenado, 3 Pipers in the works, one of which is a duplicate. How about something different, a C310?😀 T45
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.