11 hours ago, Dutch727 said:

The avionics are pretty much ready to slot in, but other model work is ongoing and when that's done the units will appear in the blank space.  They're just missing from this panel at this stage of the process, not missing altogether.  Some decisions are yet to be finalized on exactly what will go where, but we'll have 3 suites as options:  radio navigation, GNS530/430. and GTN750.

I will buy it If it will have full GTN-750 panel support 👍

4 hours ago, Ixoye said:

I will buy it If it will have full GTN-750 panel support 👍

Once you get the GTN750 in your cockpit, it’s hard to fly without it. In addition to the 310R, I’m hoping the Twin Otter and Kodiak get 750 implementations. 

35 minutes ago, NismoRR said:

Once you get the GTN750 in your cockpit, it’s hard to fly without it. In addition to the 310R, I’m hoping the Twin Otter and Kodiak get 750 implementations. 

The Kodiak will support the NXi - which as of now is a lot more solid in the navigation department.  If the PMS author can incorporate WT's advances (or their work just becomes default), the GTN will easily be better than the NXi.

Milviz twin? Take my money now, regardless how long until release 🤑

GTN 750 would be great. 

.. although I have one issue, I can't seem to find the Direct to waypoint function. Maybe because I have the free version?

The Cessna looks great! 

Edited October 29, 20214 yr by Republic3D

49 minutes ago, Republic3D said:

GTN 750 would be great. 

.. although I have one issue, I can't seem to find the Direct to waypoint function. Maybe because I have the free version?

The Cessna looks great! 

The button is on the right frame, at least on the JF Arrows.

Very nice. "thumbs up"

7 hours ago, ryanbatcund said:

The Kodiak will support the NXi - which as of now is a lot more solid in the navigation department.  If the PMS author can incorporate WT's advances (or their work just becomes default), the GTN will easily be better than the NXi.

The main advantage to using the 750 is just how easy it is do just about anything. Switching and tuning radios, inputting waypoints, loading procedures, using the transponder, etc, it’s just an absolute pleasure to use where the g1000 is much more frustrating. 

The Milviz 310R is probably the most awaited GA airplane for MSFS. The latest news tells of a release planned in a few months, in late March/early April.

I hope this is as good as the previous one in P3d and the 310T in XP11. I flew the 310R in the rw for approx 1500 hours and I was impressed with both versions so far produced. I hope engine management and engine performance indications are close to the rw. Also, hopefully the gps installed is better than what has been present to date.....the gtn in XP & P3d are good. Other than in ice (it sucked) this was a great airplane to fly.

This article has more information about the avionics:

https://msfsaddons.com/2022/02/01/milvis-teases-the-cessna-310r-for-msfs-with-full-cockpit-image/

 

On 10/29/2021 at 10:12 AM, NismoRR said:

Once you get the GTN750 in your cockpit, it’s hard to fly without it. In addition to the 310R, I’m hoping the Twin Otter and Kodiak get 750 implementations. 

I just started the G 1000 Nxi when I bought the Kodiak. Thought I would not like it, but now that is all I want to fly. To me the GTN 750 is a step backwards. 

Best solution: turn that stuff off...

I've never flown in the sim with crash detection or structural stuff turned on, I'm a grownup, If i screw the pooch I own up and claim my mistake and learn from it, those automatic systems were flawed in fsx, and flawed still in msfs...

I still remember landing at a stock airport a few feet early in the dirt in a bush plane, 'crash in trees' ... wot

and nevermind that addon airports sometimes don't detect properly as a usable runway and it crashes for a perfect touchdown as if its in the trees again.

That and the obvious above window thing... not a problem if its not on, i avoid flying outside the realistic envelope and it's just perfect.

11 minutes ago, AvAngel said:

Best solution: turn that stuff off...

I've never flown in the sim with crash detection or structural stuff turned on, I'm a grownup, If i screw the pooch I own up and claim my mistake and learn from it, those automatic systems were flawed in fsx, and flawed still in msfs...

I still remember landing at a stock airport a few feet early in the dirt in a bush plane, 'crash in trees' ... wot

and nevermind that addon airports sometimes don't detect properly as a usable runway and it crashes for a perfect touchdown as if its in the trees again.

That and the obvious above window thing... not a problem if its not on, i avoid flying outside the realistic envelope and it's just perfect.

This. And if I crash... I still crash... lol even with damage off I know I am virtually dead lol. Just no fade to black. 

I did several paints for the FSX C310 and seeing this again brings back the hatred I had for those tip tanks! They were a nightmare to get a straight line on. Aaaagh!

It WILL be nice to have once more though.