Flightradar24 is excellent, I often visit it (just for free). However, the advantage of it being "Live" comes at the cost of a disadvantage. I usually fly at night where North American/Australian... airports are busy. Our own ones in Germany, France... are flat at the time I'm flying.

PSXSeecontraffic/Real Traffic solves this by a timeshift feature where Real TRaffic saves data for a couple of days on their server, but this certainly isn't an option in connection with Flightradar24.

Kind regards, Michael

This sounds promising

Native models

Better sound (AIG is very poor in that regards)

And a better data source for the traffic itself

 

 

 

 

 

 

There was another addon that used FlightRadar24 on FlightSim.to at one point. Not sure if it's still there.

I think this?

https://flightsim.to/file/17289/enhanced-live-traffic

Edited December 4, 20214 yr by Tuskin38

9 hours ago, kt069 said:

Great news.Thank you for the heads up..

I was trying to use PSXT with free traffic provider but the developer stopped the usage of free provider. It needs paid traffic providers now.

So, this will be a better solution, especially using FR24.

I am somewhat confused by your phrase 'this will be a better solution because it's free'.  I guess if two products were technically similar, but one was free, I would understand going for the free.  If PSXT with paid LiveTraffic is superior, would you dismiss it purely because the developer would like some money?

4 minutes ago, MrBitstFlyer said:

I am somewhat confused by your phrase 'this will be a better solution because it's free'.  I guess if two products were technically similar, but one was free, I would understand going for the free.  If PSXT with paid LiveTraffic is superior, would you dismiss it purely because the developer would like some money?

Maybe they just don't want to spend money monthly.

Edited December 4, 20214 yr by Tuskin38

4 hours ago, pmb said:

Flightradar24 is excellent, I often visit it (just for free). However, the advantage of it being "Live" comes at the cost of a disadvantage. I usually fly at night where North American/Australian... airports are busy. Our own ones in Germany, France... are flat at the time I'm flying.

PSXSeecontraffic/Real Traffic solves this by a timeshift feature where Real TRaffic saves data for a couple of days on their server, but this certainly isn't an option in connection with Flightradar24.

Kind regards, Michael

FR24 is great, but give ADSB Tracker a try on the Google Play Store.  It shows the traffic display exactly how the UK radar screens look.  The first image is the real 'NODE' radar screen, the second is the 'Node' display in the app (London Heathrow area).  The display can be customised to look like screens from around the world.  The radar label can also be customised.

I thought Live Traffic was broken, planes not able to take off or land, appearing and disappearing, behaving erratically.

1 hour ago, dobee51 said:

I thought Live Traffic was broken, planes not able to take off or land, appearing and disappearing, behaving erratically.

Most of my "live Traffic" is Stealth Traffic. You can't even tell it is   there, .

 

Edited December 4, 20214 yr by Bobsk8

Don't like it. Models look too clean and shiny.  That's one of my pet peeves about MSFS, everything is too clean and perfect and sterile looking.  

5 hours ago, pmb said:

Flightradar24 is excellent, I often visit it (just for free). However, the advantage of it being "Live" comes at the cost of a disadvantage. I usually fly at night where North American/Australian... airports are busy. Our own ones in Germany, France... are flat at the time I'm flying.

PSXSeecontraffic/Real Traffic solves this by a timeshift feature where Real TRaffic saves data for a couple of days on their server, but this certainly isn't an option in connection with Flightradar24.

Kind regards, Michael

Hmm...I have both and have never used timeshift feature.  How does it work?

2 hours ago, dobee51 said:

I thought Live Traffic was broken, planes not able to take off or land, appearing and disappearing, behaving erratically.

This isn't using the default live traffic.

11 hours ago, kt069 said:

AIG  for AI Traffic and FSLTS (Live Traffic using Flightradar24)  for Real Live Traffic.  A good combination.

I would like to see these Developers merge into one: "Super Traffic for MSFS" ?

Easy to use installer, AI or Live, integrated MSFS ATC or Vatsim, Ground handling, Flight screen departures and arrivals.

Let it be donationware, many would support.

hmmm, Erez wrote that he will convert the FAIB stuff on his own...

https://fsxaibureau.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=364796

So now I actaual wonder?????????

7 hours ago, MrBitstFlyer said:

I am somewhat confused by your phrase 'this will be a better solution because it's free'.  I guess if two products were technically similar, but one was free, I would understand going for the free.  If PSXT with paid LiveTraffic is superior, would you dismiss it purely because the developer would like some money?

I can understand you, but let me explain myself better. 

PSXT is not perfect even with free or paid traffic provider. It also have glitches and problems. Therefore, the only reason is not the money.

2 hours ago, Greazer said:

I would like to see these Developers merge into one: "Super Traffic for MSFS" ?

Easy to use installer, AI or Live, integrated MSFS ATC or Vatsim, Ground handling, Flight screen departures and arrivals.

Let it be donationware, many would support.

Yes, we would like the solution as you mentioned. And, we were expecting this from MS/Asbo at the begining because the trailers and ads were mentioning though.

At th eend, we have these resulting solutions. I also hope to have a proper one solution.