aniiran

I had this problem. Make sure Default KATL is disabled. I just downloaded v1.0.2 from the ORBX store and it is much improved. About the same as ini JFK/LAX now with Full BATC traffic. No graphic resource error message immedeatly after much faster loading. No issues or degradation of performance after a few touch and goes. PMDG panning in VC was much smoother.

It looks like every since 2024 SU5 update Phoenix photogrammetry won't load. Is anyone else seeing the same thing? I'm pretty sure it's on the server end since Tucson, Sedona, Flagstaff, Prescott and Yuma all show up. I'm just trying to make sure it's not on my end. Also, if anyone knows how to fix it can you point me in the right direction. Thanks,

I'm still getting them. Here is the proof: Lines on Lake Erie

This is what im seeing. Ignore the stupid lines. But I think the clouds look the best they ever have. This today near Toledo OH.

Make sure your settings aren't Auto for DLSS. Only use Quality.

I like it. Performance, I couldn't really say as a standalone addon. I have New York City jammed to the rafters with DD EWR, ini JFK, MK LGA, Sam Scene NYC Times V2 and even with all that, I get good enough performance, NYC is hard on any system. It has static business jets but all the models are custom and realistic and make it feel more like a busy GA Airport. All the little issues like trees near taxiways and runways are fixed too. Gound textures and markings are greatly improved.

Thanks for the heads up. $8.67 is worth how much better it is than V1. V1 was perfectly acceptable, but this is next level. I consider Dreamflight a top tier developer.

Nope, i still see them in the ocean. I see it on land through clouds as well.

I can not get my graphics settings to stay, every single time I have to change it to turn off AI traffic and get everything to come down from ULTRA and for some reason it keeps defaulting NVIDA DLSS to Performance and it looks like word not allowed so I keep trying to get it to stay on Quality. Any Ideas why?

1. Yes i have noticed a lot of hovering aircraft lately, moving and parked, something is wrong with the traffic in the last release of BATC. The airplanes are also doing wierd warping and spinning like a top. 2. Pretty much any airport that is from 2020 and was just dragged from 2020 to 2024 will have this issue if it's not from a top tier developer. I'd contact Stealthy Duck or look for an upgrade to MSFS2024. BATC can't read the airport correctly for some reason, and yes many stock airports have this issue as well.

Don't have any interest in Boca Raton but If it hangs loading... it's the scenery. It was happeneing a lot when I was porting 2020 sceneries into 2024. Once I got 2024 certified sceneries it stopped, and I haven't seen it in several months now that most everything has a 2024. Unintstall the scenery and try it again, and if it loads that will give you your answer. I doubt it's a BATC issue.

I have only had a handful of WASM crashes and they have all been with inibuilds airplanes easpecially the A350 when it was new, but only when it was new. Never with PMDG. I have a theory that anything that changes the core of the addon or Sim causes WASM crashes, texture replacements, ipad backgrounds, model, lighting changes, anything that messes with nav data, airport nav data, etc. I have close to 300 addons. I use very few free addons. I don't trust most sceneries and especially don't trust ones that have dependencies. Good luck.

Yeah, something is up with this new release. I flew TUS to PHX and I got Approach to give me all instructions fine but then once I turned onto final for 26 it told me turn right 115. What? I ignored it and landed. That's one of the hand full of times it has messed up so badly I couldn't get anything to work after an instruction.

Is anyone else having issue with the jets vertical guidance? VNAV and FLCH work, but in VS the jet starts bobbing up and down especially on descent and in APP on ILS it initally starts climbing then rapidly descending to capture the glideslope. Eventually it captures and worsk fine but that initial glideslope interaction is messy. Horizontal guidance seems to work fine. Was I supposed to delete the the jet then install the update. I just updated it. It would be nice to know if others had this issue.

With out cockpit shots and working screen displays, I'm not holding my breath. The programming of the systems is the big time suck. Bluebird is even further along and still has no release date and they have busted the release date for over a year now. We are just now seeing working shots of the Synaptic A220. I wish people would think for a second, making these airplanes is as complicated as programming a real airplane. It's really quite amazing what we get for so little money. If it releases in 2026 great. If it doesn't I won't be surprised.

They do seem to be pumping them out, but as I have pointed out to many, they need to update DFW first. It's way behind the current airport.

It's not about current standards because the same can be said for many developers LVFR, Dominic, DDs older Airports. Same with Flightbeam KDEN. Just FYI... Inibuilds DFW was obsolete when it was released and honestly their paralax use on term A, B, C, and E are not up to standard when high end developers are making full terminal interiors. DFW now has a new terminal and 2 massive terminal extensions that are not depicted. Hell even Flightbeam SFO is out of date. We understand that there have been many changes to Charlotte, use default if you think it's better. Developers probably won't go near Charlotte right now as most developers won't touch rapidly developing airports for this reason. PacSim Salt Lake is the only one who offers up to date scenery on a regular basis. We're just now getting a high spec KATL and it's taken over 2 years to develop. Maybe you will get your wish someday. But as for now there is nothing in the pipeline that has been revealed. Same with most FSDT airports with the exception of Zurich (Mk Studios). There have only ever been a hand full of really good airports in MSFS many of them were ports Including Flightbeam and FlyTampa. There is a long list of airports needing update or "not up to standard." Have you seen X-Plane Airports.. yikes we have it really good in FS2024 land. I have a 14700, 4080 super and 64GB ram. I can run ANYTHING or any combination of addons.

I like them in areas where they are not at the gates, for instance Dzrwecki Design. KDCA, has intrusive amounts of static/animated aircraft. But most of their modern/newer sceneries have nice statics placed away from the terminals and in the more remote areas and it really adds to the realisim. At a real large airport there are insane amounts of aircraft just sitting everywhere or being serviced or worked on near hangars and remote stands. Pure AI airplanes leaves something to be desired, becuause I feel like you can never get to the number of planes there would be in real life no matter what the settings are so the static augmentation away from the terminals, makes the experience better for me.

The 182Q or the 182RG? The only one 182 that is MSFS 2024 capable is the 182Q. So I'm going to assume this is the 182RG for 2020 since there is no mention of a GNS 430 and 530? The RG works in 24 but it's messed up. You can basically just hand fly it. Unfortuanetly, now we have to say which sim and which aircraft specifically. I really think we need to split the Forums into 2020/2024. Especially as 2020 users are coming over to 2024 after the big sim update.

Yes, this is what I'm getting at. Like there is a magical developer that is better than FSDT that had done Charlotte but it's just a secret only AVSIMers know about. This was really just a post to caca on FSDTs Charlotte, which is still way way better than default. Posts like these are just like the 7 million BATC and SI posts. No developer that is better or worse than FSDT has a Charlotte in the works. Maybe if you're lucky Feel There will do KCLT in exquisite detail. One can only dream.

BATCs issue is that it leaves you high and hot most the time. I had every thing set up for a BENKY6 28 C arrival from Denver and then when I got there it turned to a 10C arrival. At PETAH at 8000 it gave me vectors of 330. BATC is okay but it always calls late. I could see what it was doing, once I got about 2 miles from the localizer it said turn right 070 descend and maintain 4000 which was okay since I was watching it but had I just been listening to ATC I would have been way too high I was going to intercept just before RAYYY but I needed to be 2300 AT RAYYY. Luckily I was smart and was already descending so the ILS was still captured just barely. So no you can use BATC but it won't improve anything yet. It olny does well when the STAR and APPROACH don't ever change. But in my case it changed when I got there so I set up everything in NAV and HDG, V/S ETC. It looked smooth but only because I was able to figure out what it was plotting and have I Navigraph Charts.

There is no other Charlotte. A simple search of Google and flightsim.to would have told you that. If you don't like it dont buy it. I still think it's better than stock MSFS2024.

Awesome. Cant wait to fly down to Brookings and Cresent City. My Grandparents lived in for 60 years and died in Gold Beach and are buried there so we go every couple of years to honor them and have a bite to eat at the porthole and hang out at otter rock. Sadly I understand the Jetty Cats are gone. I have thought of doing this airport myself, it looks great can't wait to fly there.

How are you engaging the auto pilot? Are you starting from cold and dark or started on the runway? You may have a conflicting key or peripreial assignment. FS2024 controls and key assignments are an absolute mess. Check all assignemnts for all periphrials If you start in the air does the autopilot work? Mach / trim / yaw dampers were all engaged. maybe not. try clicking them 1 by 1 while in the air and then try to activate the AP.

I only use the 175 regularly, I have the 170, 190 and 195, but the us stopped using 19Xs so I fly it a lot less. My v10.31 E175 install has worked perfect on 3 flights now TUS-PHX, DFW-OKC and SLC-BZN. I flew it for 1.5 hrs. practicing take offs and transitions to departure. Did-some touch and gos, shot a few ils approaches. I'm quite chuffed with what progress has finally been made. No WASM crashes for me but I have only ever had one WASM crash in MSFS and that was on the ini A350 when it first came out. I have 64GB ram though so that might have something to do with it. I'm so glad they fixed all the wierd cockpit reflective surface issues that were present in the stable version.