April 29, 20224 yr Author 15 minutes ago, Ianrivaldosmith said: https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/massive-fps-drop-because-of-su9/513339/83 ASOBO aware of a few things now post SU9...... Always amazes me this. I mean, the voting system for one is flawed. That is before we get started on the rest. Saw that. But as I do not have Twitter I do not know if there is more in the tweet… 5950x3d 5.4-5.7 GHz - Asus ROG 870 Crosshair Apex - GSkill Neo 2x 24 Gb 6000 mhz / cas 26 - MSI RTX 5090 Gaming Trio OC - 1x SSD M2 6000 2TB - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 1Tb - Corsair 5400 case - Corsair 360 liquid cooling set - 3x 75’ TCL tv. 13600 6 cores @ 5.1 GHz / 8 cores @ 4.0 GHz (hypterthreading on) - Asus ROG Strix Gaming D - GSkill Trident 4x Gb 3200 MHz cas 15 - Asus TUF RTX 4080 16 Gb - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 2TB - 2x Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - Corsair D4000 Airflow case - NXT Krajen Z63 AIO liquide cooling - FOV : 200 degrees My flightsim vids : https://www.youtube.com/user/fswidesim/videos?shelf_id=0&sort=dd&view=0
April 29, 20224 yr So they are aware of it, that can be good. Don’t see the point in that tweet though… 😳 7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5
April 29, 20224 yr Just wanted to mention that I deleted the photogrammetry files. Before: approach into iniScene EGLL 09L. FPS decreased to around 20. After touchdown below 20. Unplayable stutterfest. After: FPS no lower than 24 on the ground. Few stutters but mostly smooth. MS live traffic with AIG models. I had TLOD 200, OLOD 150 and settings high-ultra. 7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5
April 29, 20224 yr Ultra clouds do put some load on the GPU. Here is a quick test I did over Denver a major photogrammetry airport in the US. You have mountains, PG city, large airport and an executive airport, which I took off from and flew toward the city. C173 with G1000. FPS Test
April 29, 20224 yr On 4/28/2022 at 9:33 AM, AnkH said: Reason: Asobo continues to have basically no clue about their own engine and simply plays around with it. Sometimes they get stuff fixed by chance, sometimes they break things. If they would really KNOW their own engine, such things should not happen 2 years after release... /sarcasm off. At times I think they use the million monkey development methodology - Give a million monkeys a million piano's and one of them will eventually play Beethoven. Jeff | Private Pilot SEL, Tailwheel Endorsement | A&P Mechanic CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | Cooler: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 | GPU: EVGA RTX3080 Black | MoBo: ASUS ROG Strix B550-F Gaming (WiFi) | RAM: 32Gb DDR4 3200 Mhz CL 16 | SSDs: 2Tb Samsung M.2 980 Pro, 1Tb Samsung M.2 970 Pro, | Case: Phanteks Eclipse P500A | Monitors: LG 27GP850, Dell P2715Q | Misc: Thrustmaster T.16000M FCS HOTAS
April 30, 20224 yr 39 minutes ago, TravelRunner404 said: Ultra clouds do put some load on the GPU. Here is a quick test I did over Denver a major photogrammetry airport in the US. You have mountains, PG city, large airport and an executive airport, which I took off from and flew toward the city. C173 with G1000. FPS Test It would appear I'm paying a hefty price for my ultra clouds. Thanks for the report. [email protected] - ROG Strix Z790-E - 2X16Gb G.Skill Trident DDR5 6400 CL32 - MSI RTX 4090 Suprim X - WD SN850X 2 TB M.2 - XPG S70 Blade 2 TB M.2 - MSI A1000G PCIE5 1000 W 80+ Gold PSU - Liam Li 011 Dynamic Razer case - 58" Panasonic TC-58AX800U 4K - Pico 4 VR HMD - WinWing HOTAS Orion2 MAX - ProFlight Pedals - TrackIR 5 - W11 Pro (Passmark:12574, CPU:63110-Single:4785, GPU:50688)
April 30, 20224 yr 1 hour ago, TravelRunner404 said: Ultra clouds do put some load on the GPU Wow, that’s almost a 16fps drop going from low to ultra. Just did a flight from Rabat, Morocco to Ghardaia, Algeria. In terms of scenery not a very demanding flight. But weather was very heavy; clouds up to FL380, several layers and cloud types, visibility about 1000m at airport. I’m at clouds ultra. Still GPU core usage on average <20%. CPU <8% on average. RAM <20%. Frames locked to 30. 7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5
April 30, 20224 yr 6 hours ago, Cpt_Piett said: Just wanted to mention that I deleted the photogrammetry files. Before: approach into iniScene EGLL 09L. FPS decreased to around 20. After touchdown below 20. Unplayable stutterfest. After: FPS no lower than 24 on the ground. Few stutters but mostly smooth. MS live traffic with AIG models. I had TLOD 200, OLOD 150 and settings high-ultra. Hmmm, can you please explain how you did that, I am a bit worried to mess with the main files. Thank you
April 30, 20224 yr Perhaps a silly question; is it not an alternative to switch photogrammetry off in the sim menu rather than uninstall all the photogrammetry cities? GregH Intel Core i7 14700K / Palit RTX4070Ti Super OC / Corsair 32GB DDR5 6000 MHz / MSI Z790 M/board / Corsair NVMe 9500 read, 8500 write / Corsair PSU1200W / CH Products Yoke, Pedals & Quad; Airbus Side Stick, Airbus Quadrant / TrackIR, 32” 4K 144hz 1ms Monitor
April 30, 20224 yr 5 minutes ago, RaptyrOne said: Perhaps a silly question; is it not an alternative to switch photogrammetry off in the sim menu rather than uninstall all the photogrammetry cities? Yes, it is an option in the Options, on the Data page. AMD Ryzen 9900X3D & ASUS X870E Gaming Plus MB, w/64 Gb GSkill DDR5 RAM, PNY RTX 5090 GPU, lots of SSD's and M.2 drives, HAVN Case, Virpil VPC Panels 2 and 3, Virpil Constellation Alpha Stick, Virpil Rotor TCS Plus w/ Hawk-60 Collective grip, TM TCA Yoke Boeing Edition, TM HOTAS A-10 and F/A-18 Sticks and TM TPR Rudder pedals. Currently on Win11
April 30, 20224 yr 1 hour ago, sniper31 said: Yes, it is an option in the Options, on the Data page. but then you will have no PG at all. instead off only these cities. Rig Specs; CPU AMD Ryzen 9950X3d, GPU 5090 32gb, Memory 64GB 2x32 CL28 , WD-SN710 Black 500 GB, WD-SN710 Black 2TB, MSI x870XeTomahawk, Be Quit Straight power 1200 Watt platinum. LG Oled C4
April 30, 20224 yr 3 hours ago, McDaniel said: Hmmm, can you please explain how you did that, I am a bit worried to mess with the main files. Thank you https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/poor-performance-on-the-ground/450221/747 Don't worry, this is no "hack" or something, you are just deleting downloadable content. You can always install and use the one from the location you are at, just not all together. For transparency: I'm a community mentor at the BATC discord. However, I do not get paid for it in any way.
April 30, 20224 yr 9 hours ago, Cpt_Piett said: Just wanted to mention that I deleted the photogrammetry files. Before: approach into iniScene EGLL 09L. FPS decreased to around 20. After touchdown below 20. Unplayable stutterfest. After: FPS no lower than 24 on the ground. Few stutters but mostly smooth. MS live traffic with AIG models. I had TLOD 200, OLOD 150 and settings high-ultra. Just to be sure. With "after" you mean you re-did the entire flight? Or just loaded at the ground? Because coming in to an approach is MUCH more taxing than loading a flight on the ground, so that would not be comparable. I'm asking because at Iniscenes EGLL I find only 2-3 FPS of difference (like: 27 instead of 24) when I turn off PG entirely in the data settings. For transparency: I'm a community mentor at the BATC discord. However, I do not get paid for it in any way.
April 30, 20224 yr 2 minutes ago, Fiorentoni said: Iniscenes EGLL I find only 2-3 FPS of difference (like: 27 instead of 24) when I turn off PG entirely in the data settings. To me, it isn’t about fps. It’s about frame drops, smoothness. How much the main thread is limited.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.