Haven't seen anyone posting about it but apparently they have three airports in the pipe, TFFR, LFPG and KMCO. I think the premium Orlando isn't bad, but having a quality de Gaulle sounds pretty exciting.

https://fselite.net/content/taxi2gate-products-coming-to-msfs/

this has to be a joke…

12 hours ago, Drumcode said:

I think the premium Orlando isn't bad

Same wise. In fact, I am curious to see how much they can improve it. They could also give some realism to their version of MHTG,  a pity that they do not have it in their current projects. ( Asobo MHTG isn’t bad at all but there is still room for improvements )

Edited February 11, 20233 yr by polosim

If they are back properly, and will support their products and develop them beyond a patch or two, I'm totally down. Their sceneries in the day were pretty nice.

I was turned off by the flakiness and how they kinda dropped sceneries and ran. There's a lot to be said for outfits like FlightBeam and, even with their flaws with customer service, FSDT, versus a developer like T2G or ImagineSim, where they will go dark for years.

So far their airports were not a high quality products, so i am sceptical

1 hour ago, Beardyman said:

So far their airports were not a high quality products, so i am sceptical

Back then I had some airport by them likw LTBA, that airport was certainly high quality, maybe one of the best payware airport in msfs, imho.

25 minutes ago, 737_800 said:

Back then I had some airport by them likw LTBA, that airport was certainly high quality, maybe one of the best payware airport in msfs, imho.

I refer to their P3D creations

3 minutes ago, Beardyman said:

I refer to their P3D creations

Ok, cannot judge on them, since I never really used P3D.

They must not know there is already Seattle. Not sure why they would spend time on that 

9 hours ago, Drumcode said:

Haven't seen anyone posting about it but apparently they have three airports in the pipe, TFFR, LFPG and KMCO. I think the premium Orlando isn't bad, but having a quality de Gaulle sounds pretty exciting.

https://fselite.net/content/taxi2gate-products-coming-to-msfs/

This is crazy.  Why do an airport that's already done in great detail by default when airports like KTPA, KMSP, KPHX, and PHNL are still undone.😕  This common since with some of these developers escapes me.😣

Edited February 11, 20233 yr by Dillon

4 minutes ago, Dillon said:

This is crazy.  Why do an airport that's already done in great detail by default when airports like KTPA, KMSP, KPHX, and PHNL are still undone.😕  This common since with some of these developers escapes me.😣

They're tackling the airports they did in FSX/P3D. They might be appealing to previous fans to check them out on the new platform. In my case though, the sceneries I wanted from them were done in P3D V5 and MSFS by other developers to beautiful standard and I'm happily using those. Wish them success in their endeavors and I'll monitor their progress.

5 minutes ago, Dillon said:

This is crazy. 

Not crazy and easy to understand, You just have to look at its portfolio of sceneries  developed for FSX and/or P3D. 

Certain airports are likely to be quite popular, and it can make economic sense for different developers to compete or to aim at different price points.

26 minutes ago, Dillon said:

Why do an airport that's already done in great detail by default

 

6 minutes ago, JabbleWok said:

Certain airports are likely to be quite popular, and it can make economic sense for different developers to compete or to aim at different price points.

Thing is with KSEA, the Asobo default is acceptable to a lot of people who don't fly into Sea-Tac all that often. AmSim/BMotW's payware release probably scooped-up a lot of the market for anyone interested in a more detailed version.

There's nothing T2G has produced since their first hiatus from airport scenery development that has encouraged people to replace what they already have, and certainly not at the higher-end pricing they charge.

Given that the they seem to want to plow ahead with scenery from their back catalogue, regardless of what has already been released, it's not an encouraging sign. Happy to be proven wrong. We'll just have to wait and see.

agree.  To me the only compelling one they could produce would be KMCO.  But they would need to spend a good amount of time on the new terminal.  What turns me off about T2G is that they for months/years at a time and provide little support.  Typically they release an airport then a very quick update usually a couple weeks after.  Then they go back in their bunker. 

57 minutes ago, Dillon said:

This is crazy.  Why do an airport that's already done in great detail by default when airports like KTPA, KMSP, KPHX, and PHNL are still undone.😕  This common since with some of these developers escapes me.😣

 KTPA: Being done by Vertical Sim

KMSP/PHX: Being done by flightbeam

PHNL: I think still being done by FSDT