Fenix V2 B1 Released

[carlanthony24 579]

2 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said:

I decided to try the update, after Dave convinced me to give it a go. I have the older installer, in case I want to roll back to V1. So far everything seems to work, V2 seems to have slightly lower FPS than V1, is what I have noticed right off the bat. 

You have restarted the computer after updating?

[Bobsk8 12,879]

1 minute ago, carlanthony24 said:

You have restarted the computer after updating?

Yes, just  did it. I had it locked to 30 fps before. I unlocked it to see FPS, and that seems to have the GPU usage much higher. I just locked it to 30 fps again, and GPU usage went down to about 65%, which seems normal. 

[tull 290]

Well I just completed my first flight Bob , I mean it runs ok but I so used to smoooooth, what you have never had you never miss but once youve had it thats it!

Anyway...awesome flight, awesome aircraft....I certainly wont be ditching the fenix because of a few frame drops

[jarmstro 2,405]

FPS is fine for me. Only thing I've noticed is some sound syncopation with regard to wind noise.

Edited August 10, 2023 by jarmstro

[xenonsk 129]

Better performance than previous one here.

[Ricardo41 5,959]

Great performance. No issues. PC is no louder than usual. Performance holds steady, even after all displays are on. 

 

[mrlip 56]

44 minutes ago, fluffyflops said:

It would do if the fuel bias's are different,

Not to mention the dry operaing, and max take off weights are different.  Flightplanning is not as simple as you think mate 

None of those things have changed with the new profile 

[Ricardo41 5,959]

How many folks are going to read the entire change log (I did), at the end of which Fenix says:

"Now, whilst all of this is very exciting, there is a very important caveat that should be noted. You are about to go from a mature release that has been proven over 9 months by thousands of users, to a build run earlier today, and tested by a couple dozen testers. Whilst we've worked hard to ensure there are no super egregious issues that'll ruin the fun, we do anticipate a fair few bumps and lumps in this version as we go from an in-house testing team, to the wild west of the entire customer base. We've also held-off addressing a number of minor issues that, quite frankly, weren't worth delaying the entire release for another couple weeks over. If you encounter anything that needs some polish, worry not, we will be continuing refinement work on pretty much every area of the aircraft. With that, we really hope you enjoy this first part of a nearly year-long effort to deliver the A320 simulation we've always wanted."

[carlanthony24 579]

Just now, Ricardo41 said:

How many folks are going to read the entire change log (I did), at the end of which Fenix says:

"Now, whilst all of this is very exciting, there is a very important caveat that should be noted. You are about to go from a mature release that has been proven over 9 months by thousands of users, to a build run earlier today, and tested by a couple dozen testers. Whilst we've worked hard to ensure there are no super egregious issues that'll ruin the fun, we do anticipate a fair few bumps and lumps in this version as we go from an in-house testing team, to the wild west of the entire customer base. We've also held-off addressing a number of minor issues that, quite frankly, weren't worth delaying the entire release for another couple weeks over. If you encounter anything that needs some polish, worry not, we will be continuing refinement work on pretty much every area of the aircraft. With that, we really hope you enjoy this first part of a nearly year-long effort to deliver the A320 simulation we've always wanted."

The people that don't then its on them. No one will help them if they don't. They just think oh its immediately at bug etc

[sonny147 586]

2 hours ago, Bobsk8 said:

https://imgur.com/

still cant do it 

[michdb8 46]

i restarted the computer and the performance still almost the same version 1  still far behind from pmdg 737, 787 or ATR performance , when i take off or land  most payware airports fps go under 15-20 fps 

they said before release that performance is going to a be a little better than  pmdg  but with pmdg 737 i get 10 more fps  and the cpu usage is 20-25% less 

 

[rob0203 697]

Great performance here also!

[carlanthony24 579]

8 minutes ago, michdb8 said:

i restarted the computer and the performance still almost the same version 1  still far behind from pmdg 737, 787 or ATR performance , when i take off or land  most payware airports fps go under 15-20 fps 

they said before release that performance is going to a be a little better than  pmdg  but with pmdg 737 i get 10 more fps  and the cpu usage is 20-25% less 

 

restarted computer?

[sonny147 586]

high latency though probably settings

[michdb8 46]

4 minutes ago, carlanthony24 said:

restarted computer?

is mentioned on first sentence. XD