michdb8

What injector are you using here because weird to see the JAL aircraft parking at that terminal since they all use terminal 2

you can use frame generation with amd I have 6700xt and I have frame generation with FSR 3.1 is not implemented yet by Microsoft but will probably in the coming months but there is a mod that you can add and allow the use fsr 3.1 in msfs 20 and msfs 24 here is a video from someone who explains how works

wow, all this without monthly cost is amazing. It is great idea on the implementation cause using their own model gonna avoid many problems with out-of-context staff than other general ai models do

this is a good video comparing interesting results

well, i msfs 24 doesn't matter if you have aig and fstl takes same time to load so better have both and cover all airliners and models. in msfs if you have both the first load is very slow

i dont like defend pmdg cause the ceo is an a** but you clearly don't know how sdk work fenix have everything almost outside the sim the model the efb while the pmdg all go through the SDK that why they are able to sell on the marketplace and xbox and they are limited by sim staff and there was a lot of changes on the sdk from the 20 version

i recommend you aig for BATC even is harder to install with aig you never going to see white default liveries while with fslt you gonna see white liveries due they dont cover many airlines

they add a upgrade fee for msfs 24 those scammers even after didn't finish deliver the promise atc product now they going to charge for a simple upgrade thta tooks few hours to do. after waste my money i never gona spend more on that atc. BATC devs at least dont charge you for small updates

which is the resolution? i talking abou 1080p which 8gb vram should be enough for 2k, 4k is different and need more than 10gb

the biggest problem with gpu in msfs is the vram usage is crazy how hight even a hybrid medium-high settings on a 8gb vram on busy airport get destroy while in msfs 20 with dx12 was very hard to go over 8 vram with fenix AI traffic atc ini build KJFK at same time in high settings

is terrible compared with the app we had in msfs 20 cause you can customize the settings I hope they can port the addon

lol i notice that to work on msfs 24 they add an upgrade fee lol offensive initials not allowed this act is still like an early access with many things not working and even in msfs 20 was work in progress now they charge a feed lol at least we have beyond atc where the upgrade is free

one of the worst changes in the GUI area is how terrible is now to select liveries or aircraft variations you have to go a other menu than takes 3 times more than use to be in msfs20. and lest no talk about customization where we cant make liveries we cant edit default aircraft lights or other improves that could make aircrafts better. they touch areas that was already good in msfs they could spend more time adding double jetway or ai traffic, atc and fsr 3.1 etc

activate the developer mode in setting/general/advance options and after the dev bar shows go to the debug tab and in an list you gona find a line say Display FPS click there and you gona see all performances meters and in one show you the vram you have and the vram that msfs is using . but if you have the 3070 probably you are short on vram cause even on medium settings 8 vram is not enough probably by how terrible is optimize is the sim on vram side.

didn't these guys announce a 787 in the fs expo this summer also having the 767 on the roadmap I guess we gonna get the 787 in msfs 2032 lol

you cant because the fshud use a terrible way to implement Airac where you get direct from the server from navigrapth so if your subscription ends you lose all old Airacs and back to the default 2101 that fshud has which is too much old and you gonna end having problem with aircrafts fmc. many people already complained but for some reason, they don't change the implementation way. is the worst part of fs hud you must have navigrapth subscription and for offline flight I think is not worth to pay every month better once per year like you can do that with BATC or SI

no cause the problem is in the main core with this i get 20 22 fps, cause msfs and fshud most of the usage is in one core is what a can see when i use a cpu core meter msfs is very bad using multicore for now even on dx12

resolution 1080 graphics settings in medium few on high, Terrain at 70 , LOD 90 cpu i7-7700K (4 cores 8 Threads) gpu amd 5700XT (8gb vram) 32 gb ram

peak is around 40-41% average is around 25-30 % and low peaks around 17% if i dont have traffic i get like 7%, what is weird is sometimes i get 40% usage at cruse altitude with just 7 ai traffic but before at departure airport the usage was lower with much more ai traffic. i think you should guys implement in future updates some kind of options sliders to inject traffic i already saw some people mention about this but the fslt injector is has some nice setting that help a lot for medium and low end computers and is the range of injection on the ground and air ai traffic , in my case using a limiter range of injection of 15 km for ground aircrafts and 80 km for ai traffic in the air increase around 15 fps , the ground ai traffic range help a lot in cities with multiple close airports like Dallas, New York, Tokyo etc cause ground traffic don't spawn in the near airports the atc and traffic injection works really well and with this new voices gona be much better, but performance is a big downside for this addon

i just did a test now a take a look at cpu usage compare with msfs using the pmdg 777 and fslt with fs hud

in my case with you atc progrma is also having big problems with performance to the point that the atc addon had more cpu usage than MSFS itself i never see a addon than spend more cpu usage than the sim at was only around 15-20 ai traffic injection. i think in the last 6 months i only use the atc few times to test updates but for now i prefer using the traffic injector of FSLT or AIG cause i can have 30-40 ai traffic and fps still over 30 fps and no many stutters but with your atc even with 10 ai traffic is already big stutters and fps around 17-20 so is unplayable with that performance probably if you have a high end cpu is ok but having worse performance than the default traffic injector when that injector is the same from FSX 2006 which was always criticized of be outdated and having terrible performance and to me the point of a modern atc addon that inject traffic now is to have better performance than default.

how it is the performance of the md-11 on cpu more light like pmdg or heavy like Fenix or ini builds aircrafts?

removed

if i use frame generator in the target fps should i put the target frames after frame generator or the default sim?

thank you !! finally worked that way, i tested with the 220 version files and worked