michdb8

What injector are you using here because weird to see the JAL aircraft parking at that terminal since they all use terminal 2

you can use frame generation with amd I have 6700xt and I have frame generation with FSR 3.1 is not implemented yet by Microsoft but will probably in the coming months but there is a mod that you can add and allow the use fsr 3.1 in msfs 20 and msfs 24 here is a video from someone who explains how works

wow, all this without monthly cost is amazing. It is great idea on the implementation cause using their own model gonna avoid many problems with out-of-context staff than other general ai models do

this is a good video comparing interesting results

well, i msfs 24 doesn't matter if you have aig and fstl takes same time to load so better have both and cover all airliners and models. in msfs if you have both the first load is very slow

i dont like defend pmdg cause the ceo is an a** but you clearly don't know how sdk work fenix have everything almost outside the sim the model the efb while the pmdg all go through the SDK that why they are able to sell on the marketplace and xbox and they are limited by sim staff and there was a lot of changes on the sdk from the 20 version

i recommend you aig for BATC even is harder to install with aig you never going to see white default liveries while with fslt you gonna see white liveries due they dont cover many airlines

they add a upgrade fee for msfs 24 those scammers even after didn't finish deliver the promise atc product now they going to charge for a simple upgrade thta tooks few hours to do. after waste my money i never gona spend more on that atc. BATC devs at least dont charge you for small updates

which is the resolution? i talking abou 1080p which 8gb vram should be enough for 2k, 4k is different and need more than 10gb

the biggest problem with gpu in msfs is the vram usage is crazy how hight even a hybrid medium-high settings on a 8gb vram on busy airport get destroy while in msfs 20 with dx12 was very hard to go over 8 vram with fenix AI traffic atc ini build KJFK at same time in high settings

is terrible compared with the app we had in msfs 20 cause you can customize the settings I hope they can port the addon

lol i notice that to work on msfs 24 they add an upgrade fee lol offensive initials not allowed this act is still like an early access with many things not working and even in msfs 20 was work in progress now they charge a feed lol at least we have beyond atc where the upgrade is free

one of the worst changes in the GUI area is how terrible is now to select liveries or aircraft variations you have to go a other menu than takes 3 times more than use to be in msfs20. and lest no talk about customization where we cant make liveries we cant edit default aircraft lights or other improves that could make aircrafts better. they touch areas that was already good in msfs they could spend more time adding double jetway or ai traffic, atc and fsr 3.1 etc

activate the developer mode in setting/general/advance options and after the dev bar shows go to the debug tab and in an list you gona find a line say Display FPS click there and you gona see all performances meters and in one show you the vram you have and the vram that msfs is using . but if you have the 3070 probably you are short on vram cause even on medium settings 8 vram is not enough probably by how terrible is optimize is the sim on vram side.

you offload in the morning Asia, evening is the worst time for a international deployment cause is night in asia evening in Europe and morning in America best times are always morning zulu or 3-4 am zulu

servers are probably go down for a freeware project, for some reason they avoid the best time which is morning in Zulu time when EU people are working and America is sleeping if is a evening release is gonna bring down the servers lol

didn't these guys announce a 787 in the fs expo this summer also having the 767 on the roadmap I guess we gonna get the 787 in msfs 2032 lol

you cant because the fshud use a terrible way to implement Airac where you get direct from the server from navigrapth so if your subscription ends you lose all old Airacs and back to the default 2101 that fshud has which is too much old and you gonna end having problem with aircrafts fmc. many people already complained but for some reason, they don't change the implementation way. is the worst part of fs hud you must have navigrapth subscription and for offline flight I think is not worth to pay every month better once per year like you can do that with BATC or SI

cpu multicore is much better but for some reason, the GPU usage is ridiculously high I just hope is cause is a alpha without optimize in the visual stuff cause the GPU usage and the fps are the same with msfs 24 with the lowest settings same as if I using high settings In msfs 20

well for such a different performance i hope they did 0 optimization in this build because the difference is too big and i been in the msfs20 alpha since the first month and the performance was never such a diff even 8 months before release

look at this the there is something wrong with gpu performance in msfs 24 compare msfs 24 with the lowest possible settings and here MSFS 20 in high settings with ini build airport addon almost same fps and gpu usage still no even 90% while in 24 is at 98%

I did a test with the 172 in KLAX using the ini build airport addon in msfs 20 and msfs 24 and I compared in my case msfs 20 have better perfomance

is me of the gpu is always at 100% doesn't even matter high settings or low is the same usage lol. cpu performance got better but GPU performance got much worse without big visuals

some aircraft addons still working in msfs 24

I just test the the new version a wow this is another level of controlling traffic. there are two areas now the blue where they inject the traffic on the sim and the purple where the aircraft are not injected on the sim but they are on the ATC control and they still communicating with ATC, nice way to have far traffic but without drop performance.