This guy has been a great help for people like like many others me since Aerosoft´s times of the first Airbus.  Definitely this (before great, great ) forum has gone downhill. What a pity.

Miquel.

On 11/23/2023 at 6:14 PM, Jeff Nielsen said:

WOW, this guy is a IRL pilot?  Laterally he was missed way back at the IAF and also overshot the FAC by a mile.  This plane still has a way to go, but good start. It still needs a bunch of LNAV and VNAV adjustments as well as a ton of other stuff that's on the NEOs from the FMGC on up.  Some are probably operator options but would be nice to see them.  This honestly looks more like a CEO with a NEO model, but for a replacement of the default bus, good start.

That’s wasn’t my take at all. I think your criticism is really unfair of the pilot tbh. 

 

He knew what he and the aircraft SHOULD be doing IRL and was just leaving it in lnav etc to see how it coped. He pointed out the aircraft missed the 185 speed restriction and overshot the 2 fixes at the time. He even mentions it AGAIN in the mini debrief after exiting the runway. The point is to show how the aircraft copes with an RNAV approach, NOT what you need to do to make it work better. 
 

He did intervene with the gear early due to the tailwind but I thought it was a good little video and excellent depiction of how the aircraft copes with a non ILS approach. 
 

Anyone watching this video now knows that the aircraft copes OK (not amazingly well) with an RNAV approach and what to expect and be wary off. Which seemed to be the purpose of it. 

Edited November 25, 20232 yr by g-liner

Since we are off track anyway, their MSFS A310 is terrible and they offer no support despite its relative young time on MSFS.  So, just like so many other developers, these people move-on before offering a solid product.  Another Aerosoft!

25 minutes ago, Dreamflight767 said:

their MSFS A310 is terrible

No it isn't.

  

25 minutes ago, Dreamflight767 said:

So, just like so many other developers, these people move-on before offering a solid product

Well no, the A310 and A320 are Microsoft projects, ini are just the devs. Anything you want needs to be reported to Microsoft.

And several A310 fixes have been released since it came out, it wasn't abandoned.

Edited November 25, 20232 yr by Tuskin38

56 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said:

No it isn't.

  

Well no, the A310 and A320 are Microsoft projects, ini are just the devs. Anything you want needs to be reported to Microsoft.

And several A310 fixes have been released since it came out, it wasn't abandoned.

The airplane can't fly an ILS.  At slow speeds (approach speeds) the airplane becomes unstable - feels like it's on the verge of a stall and about to roll.  As I approached my destination today, my FPS dropped to 8.  Stuttered like mad.  Good luck trying to save your flight so you load it back.

  

22 minutes ago, Dreamflight767 said:

The airplane can't fly an ILS.  At slow speeds (approach speeds) the airplane becomes unstable - feels like it's on the verge of a stall and about to roll.  As I approached my destination today, my FPS dropped to 8.  Stuttered like mad.  Good luck trying to save your flight so you load it back.

I've had none of these issues when flying the A310.

Unless this is a recent thing, I haven't flown it in a couple months.

Edited November 25, 20232 yr by Tuskin38

27 minutes ago, Dreamflight767 said:

The airplane can't fly an ILS.  At slow speeds (approach speeds) the airplane becomes unstable - feels like it's on the verge of a stall and about to roll.  As I approached my destination today, my FPS dropped to 8.  Stuttered like mad.  Good luck trying to save your flight so you load it back.

I've also noticed some similar things - it doesn't fit at the back and front and that's why I don't like inibuild's aircraft and since every developer has their own style, the A320 probably won't be any different.

The way it is now, it's just not finished !

And an update to the A310 will probably take forever and never comes to the costumers..

cheers 😉

ini has said they sent updates to Microsoft, but they sometimes take forever to release.

There are some A310 updates in SU14. Though it just seems to be a couple small things

A310 Radio Stuck Broadcasting on KSNS ATIS After Departing KSFO.
Vertical speed knob labeled as “altitude knob” in tooltip.

 

 

Edited November 25, 20232 yr by Tuskin38

According to Nico on the ini Discord, the VNAV decent calculations being too sharp for the autopilot to keep up has been fixed.

Won't have to worry about that at launch at least.

Inibuilds A320 Neo , Go Around DEMO:
 

 

Looking at these vids, I wonder to myself, not for the first time, exactly what level of detail we can really fairly expect from a free default aircraft.....

So what is the consensus Ini Vs FBW ?

On 11/23/2023 at 7:07 PM, carlanthony24 said:

If you read on further I explained I never saw the tweet so I apologised thought I had edited the post. Oh well.  You also said you did not believe they were a genuine member 

What I said the evidence when you looked at each one did not support what he was saying which is an opinion of mine. It looked to me like he was comparing the coding from the FBW and Inibuilds but the pictures showed different from what I could see. its not a conclusion its what I literally can see from viewing the images. First two images one is just a text file with text saying A310 hes saying its from the 320. We don't know that for certain since its cropped, and is a little different from the code he showed of the FBW. Then the other four images show code from the Inibuilds aircraft but nothing to match from FBW. You would think he would show a side by side comparison for the other images to back his point up. "it appears they’re compiling our JS files into WASM with a custom runtime". No evidence to support that though like I said. 

The wording used Court of public opinion its more like the guy is really asking for trouble like a lot have said in the comments. You just don't make things like this public not only will it damage himself but damage FBW and Inibuilds. Its not a conclusion its just an opinion but people saying they won't support Inibuilds without the facts is jumping to conclusions. Sorry some people may not like this but not going to lose sleep over this. I will carry on supporting no matter what. I wonder how many of these said they would not support FSLabs because of what they did but still buy products from them....

No announcement from any company since this happened besides they won't comment at this time. My opinion maybe its been swept under the carpet and does not need talking about, maybe the guy exaggerated with what he said and they did not steal but used similar code. To say oh "I'm not supporting Inibuilds because of this is silly when we literally don't have full facts. 

Friend, you really are wasting a lot of your time focussing on this character with long posts like this.
Surely there are more useful things to do with your life.  We all know about him, and maybe you need to let it go! 

Edited November 27, 20232 yr by bobcat999

On 11/24/2023 at 5:20 AM, Greazer said:

737NGDriver has no clue how to fly IAN mode in a 737 and he's supposed to be a 737 Driver.

To be fair he flew for Ryanair and they don‘t have/use the IAN, only LNAV/VNAV approaches. So he‘d have no practical experience with it. What was he wrong about by the way in regards to IAN approaches?

7 hours ago, Greazer said:

So what is the consensus Ini Vs FBW ?

Once the VNAV is fixed, I’ll probably switch to the ini version