November 19, 20232 yr developers keep slinging out airbus for MSFS the reason for this is, the flight model in MSFS is not good at all.. and you can "hide" it by the extra layer of Airbus FBW laws... why do we need a Asobo A320, FBW A320, Fenix A320, and now INI A320??? do the users have some obsession with this airplane? there seems to be such a fascination with OCD personality and configuring exactly what brake fans or sharklets your airbus has... how about getting the flying model close to being correct? plus the Headwinds A330 which is just a FBW A320 skin... MSFS out for 4+ years and no decent boeing long haul aircraft available.. instead you have to cope with pretending the A310 is long haul Edited November 19, 20232 yr by ahmede19
November 19, 20232 yr If this isn't trolling I don't know what is. Mods might as well lock this right now before it turns into a dust bin fire. Kael Oswald 9950X3D/ 64GB DDR5 6200 @ CL30 / Custom Water Loop / RTX 5090 / 3 x 48" LG C4 OLEDs
November 19, 20232 yr 5 minutes ago, Ridvan Celik said: I vote for the OP to be banished from the garden of Avsim. The garden of Avsim? Follow me on : Instagram See my Trailer: A Year Of Flight
November 19, 20232 yr 14 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said: Your first post. LOL. Way to start off...👎 Yep when an opinion is wanted it will be given to you 😵💫 David Porrett
November 19, 20232 yr Author not trolling, i have been a member since 2014. i am interested to hear the communities thoughts on why there are so many iterations of the exact same boring FBW aircraft , and the intent with which developers obscure MSFS flight model with Airbus law
November 19, 20232 yr Topic starter knows a lot about flight model from the dreams lol Life time flight sim enthusiast, current airplane owner 172P (past C182F). FAA CP/IR ASEL/AMEL, FI ASELMy System: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D , MSI X870 GAMING PLUS, 64G RAM, ASUS RTX5090, 4T SSDPut my hands on (pic/dual/given)7GCAA, 8KCAB, BE24, BE76, BE35-C33, BE35, C150, C152, C172B/N/P/R/SP, 182F, M20E,M20C, M20J, AT6(SNJ4), PA28-140,PA28-151, PA28-161,PA28-181,PA28RT-201,PA28R-180/201T, PA24-250, PA32-300R, PA44, AC114, YAK-18T, YAK-52, SR22
November 19, 20232 yr 10 minutes ago, ahmede19 said: not trolling, i have been a member since 2014. i am interested to hear the communities thoughts on why there are so many iterations of the exact same boring FBW aircraft , and the intent with which developers obscure MSFS flight model with Airbus law Oh Please, give us all a break.
November 19, 20232 yr 35 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said: Your first post. LOL. Way to start off...👎 I mean...he has a point actually. Intel i9-13900K | Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Master | RTX4090 | 2x16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 | Be quiet! Pure Loop 2 FX AiO | Win 11
November 19, 20232 yr 50 minutes ago, ahmede19 said: MSFS out for 4+ years and no decent boeing long haul aircraft available What about the 787 and 747? Some people here and elsewhere have said the default 787 is almost as good as the Quality Wings one now. Some have even said it's better. I've not seen any comments on the 747 though. I fly it almost once a week, it gets me where it need to without crashing or falling out of the air, VNAV and LNAV work. 50 minutes ago, ahmede19 said: the flight model in MSFS is not good at all Not true at all. Edited November 19, 20232 yr by Tuskin38
November 19, 20232 yr 1 minute ago, ThomseN_inc said: I mean...he has a point actually. He doesn’t. Just taking a second to think would demonstrate that asobo has been making big Investments in improving their default aircraft for both PC and Xbox players and the ini A320 is just another one of those. This is just very obviously troll bait and it’s working pretty well.
November 19, 20232 yr 22 minutes ago, ahmede19 said: i have been a member since 2014. And yet these are your first two posts?
November 19, 20232 yr 25 minutes ago, ahmede19 said: not trolling, i have been a member since 2014. i am interested to hear the communities thoughts on why there are so many iterations of the exact same boring FBW aircraft , and the intent with which developers obscure MSFS flight model with Airbus law Boring to you. It's not objectively boring. You could maybe consider ommitting a little of the hyperbole. If you hadn't included the rather infantile boring in that post, I might have been inclined to engage with you on what you were raising. Oh go on then... Airbus law is a necessity for any A3XX aircraft developed for the sim. Developers have to include it, if they want their model to be even slightly realistic. So how is that an "intent to obscure the MSFS flight model"? FBW does not depart from the MSFS flight model. The flight model determines the physics of flight within the sim. Whether an aircraft uses computers to manipulate flight controls doesn't depart from or 'cover up' the flight model. Everything in MSFS is subject to the proprietary flight model. With the exception of boats and cars perhaps. 😄 Edited November 19, 20232 yr by JYW Added some italics because I love italics. Bill 😎FS2024 • Currently in 'GA mode' : A2A Comanche 2024 & Aerostar • Black Square C208, Bonanzas, Barons, TBM850, Dukes • COWS DA40 & DA42 • FSW Legacy, C24R Sierra & C414 • Echo Falco F8L • FFX HJET, Visionjet and P180 2024 • Got Friends A32 Vixxen • FSReborn Sirius TL3000, Sting S4 and Piper M500 • Flyboy Rans S6S • Skyward DA50RG • SWS Zenith CH701, RV-8, RV-10, RV-14, PC12 • Milviz C310R • Air Foil Labs Bristell B23 TrackIR • BeyondATC • PMS GTN Payware • RealTurb • Axis & Ohs • FS Realistic Pro9800X3D • RTX 3080 • 64GB DDR5-6000NPPL licence holder in the UK
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.