27 minutes ago, abrams_tank said:

Now if you didn't purchase anything from the MSFS marketplace, then please ignore what I wrote, it probably doesn't apply to you.

Thank you very much for trying to help.
No, I've never purchased addons from the Marketplace, I prefer to help smaller companies.
The workaround is for those who face the "97% issue", which is not my case. Actually, loading the simulator goes very fast, less than 2 minutes. My streaming problem comes when I enter a flight.

Well, I am so happy I didn't uninstall 2020.
If MS doesn't fix their servers' serious weakness in the upcoming weeks, 2024's future will be seriously compromised.

On Day 1 I said 2-3 weeks to settle out and so far that's what's happening.  Of course it will all be resolved in due time, likely sooner than later.  2-3 weeks might be a little to hopeful but in any case no need for hysteria this is a massive new project, never been done before streaming a super complex digital twin.  When 2024 is 4y out we will realize the first few weeks or even months is a drop in its service life bucket.

It’s a bit all over the place in terms of performance. Sometimes it’s excellent, other times fps plummets. Glad to hear in a way that I’m not alone in experiencing this.

4 hours ago, altenae said:

Every day is another day performance wise..

It's driving me nuts.

Monday EHRD with the Fenix 320/Inibuild 320N parked I have  stable 60FPS no stutter what so ever.

Tuesday same scenario it's a mess. Stutter and stutter. FPS down to 15 FPS with every change of view.

Wednesday same scenario.....

etc.

 

 

The answer is in your message: the problem is not in the sim engine, but in the airplanes: Fenix is experimental, and the Inibuilds A3xx need a lot of work to be well optimized. Generally, using GA airplanes you can have stable 60fps, this is my experience with FS24.

The last couple of days I'm getting magnificent performance; the sim loads fast and is as smooth as butter on ultra settings; strange it can be so different for others...

2 hours ago, Bobsk8 said:

I have never liked X plane since the first day I saw it decades ago, but if they ever pull the plug on  MS 2020, I think I would be tempted to give it a try. 

Even with the old-style computer-drawn graphics, in lieu of real-world scenery? Personally I could never go back to that. 

2 hours ago, Bobsk8 said:

I have never liked X plane since the first day I saw it decades ago, but if they ever pull the plug on  MS 2020, I think I would be tempted to give it a try. 

They not pull the plug for MSFS2020 until 2028, and just give the MS/Asobo Team some time for MSFS2024 ( this can not happen in one week ) to sort out the problems with there server issues because almost everthing that happens is about this.

So i assume that they have to enlarge the server park, create the cache differently ( make it much, much bigger ) and or let the users download the material ( airplane packages ect, ect. ) and save it on their own HDDs.

And some more..

cheers 😊

I think introducing the option to cache/store locally large amounts of data would be a good thing. It would speed up the process for the users that want to do it, and also for the users who want to rely on the servers. The load on the servers would lessen significantly, increasing performance.

Yup, was cruising in the 45-60 fps range, last 2 days its 25-40fps. No settings changed, quite peculiar.

6 hours ago, Piotr007 said:

Dumpster fire cannot be cured. We need local storage of the sim. Only solution, only answer. Wait for it.

But isn't the rolling cache for local storage?

I posted a lot of detailed measurements about this problem in the following thread:

Bottom Line - within a two hour period I went from 40+ fps to 2 fps and then back to 40+ fps in three sessions about 30-minutes apart.  The three sessions used identical setting, aircraft, flight plan.  Nothing changed between sessions. 

1 GB fiber connection consistently measured by OOKLA at 950+ GBs - cpu and gpu frame time does not change from session to session.  What does change is the download traffic - 16GB rolling cache does not prevent the sim from downloading 5 to 10 times as much data in the low FPS session as the first high fps session despite the 2nd session flying over the identical ground/objects as in the first session. 

This has happened to me three times now. 

Edited November 27, 20241 yr by TacomaSailor