August 19, 2025Aug 19 Sorry if this has been answered a thousand times before, but......does FSHud 2.0 improve the animation of the AI planes (when compared to default mode)? The default taxi/take off/landing animations of AI planes (at least in MSFS 2020) are very crude. Christopher Low AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU / 64GB DDR5-6000 RAM / 12GB Nvidia RTX 4070 Super GPU / Gigabyte X870E Aorus Elite Wifi 7 / 1+2TB Samsung Evo Plus M2 Nvme UK2000 Beta Tester
August 19, 2025Aug 19 Well, I never noticed anything strange with FSHud aircraft taxiing in MSFS. I also use it in P3D, and I saw no difference. I haven't yet paid any attention to takeoffs and landings, because I keep a very low amount of active aircraft. Best regards,Luis Hernández Main rig: self built, AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D (with SMT off and CO -50 mV), 2x16 GB DDR4-3200 RAM, Nvidia RTX 5060Ti 16GB, 256 GB M.2 SSD (OS+apps) + 2x1 TB SATA III SSD (sims) + 1 TB 7200 rpm HDD (storage), ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS air cooler, Viewsonic VX2458-MHD 1920x1080@120-144 Hz (G-sync compatible), Windows 11. Running P3D v5.4 (with v4.5 scenery objects as an additional library, just in case), FSX-SE, MSFS2020, MSFS2024 and even FS9! Lossless Scaling for all my sims. What a godsend...Mobile rig: ASUS Zenbook UM425QA (AMD Ryzen 7 5800H APU @3.2 GHz and boost disabled, 1 TB M.2 SSD, 16 GB RAM, Windows 11 Pro). Running FS9 there .VKB Gladiator NXT Premium Left + GNX THQ as primary controllers. Xbox Series X|S wireless controller as standby/mobile.
August 19, 2025Aug 19 The difference between taxi mode in P3D and MSFS is that MSFS has sloping runways. In default mode, the AI planes "step up" in small increments as they ascend slopes (rather than rolling up them). It looks ridiculous. Christopher Low AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU / 64GB DDR5-6000 RAM / 12GB Nvidia RTX 4070 Super GPU / Gigabyte X870E Aorus Elite Wifi 7 / 1+2TB Samsung Evo Plus M2 Nvme UK2000 Beta Tester
August 19, 2025Aug 19 5 hours ago, Christopher Low said: Sorry if this has been answered a thousand times before, but......does FSHud 2.0 improve the animation of the AI planes (when compared to default mode)? The default taxi/take off/landing animations of AI planes (at least in MSFS 2020) are very crude. I use AIG Traffic. As far as Taxiing and T.O. 's go FSHud will remove AIG aircraft if for eg. AI taxiing In with me taxiing Out (not realistic, but the AI aircraft will not conflict) on the same Taxiway. Also, ATC will ask me or another aircraft to hold to allow one or the other to continue taxi. For T.O. I always get "Hold Short" Instructions at the appropriate "Hold Short Markings" for the Runway...with a "Hold Short" instruction for Landing Traffic (I have been held for several aircraft at busy airports), or just "Cleared for T.O.". Overall I am very happy with how well FSHud keeps me separated from AIG Traffic! i913900KF (5.8GHz) | Case: Fractal PopAir RGB I Gigabyte Z790 UD AX| MSI Gaming RTX 4070Ti Super 16GB | Kingston Fury Beast 64GB DDR5 5200Mhz | SOLIDIGM P41 Plus 2TB NVMe M.2 SSD | Samsung SSD 870 EVO 2TB | Thermalright Frozen Notte 240 MM Liquid Cooling | LG EVO 42" Monitor 3840 x 2160 120Hz | Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo | Logitech G Pro pedals | Tobii EyeTracker | 850W Thermaltake 80+ GOLD |
August 19, 2025Aug 19 7 hours ago, Christopher Low said: The difference between taxi mode in P3D and MSFS is that MSFS has sloping runways. In default mode, the AI planes "step up" in small increments as they ascend slopes (rather than rolling up them). It looks ridiculous. In default MSFS injected traffic, there are many other, much more ridiculous things than ascending slopes 😁 But how is it related to fshud?
August 20, 2025Aug 20 On 8/19/2025 at 1:24 AM, FSHud said: This will be changed very soon (before roadmap 2025 will start to come out). There will be a mode to improt Navigraph NavData files - which doesn't change until your decision. This option will be additional to existing option (when FSHud updates NavData by subscription). Any ETA on that ? because of the Shutdown of Opensky end of August i'm searching a new ATC Tool, and Navigraph with older AIRAC is very much needed, dont want to spend 10 dollar every month on navigraph. Thinking about P2ATC 3.0 and FSHUD, more inclined to FSHUD when it will have the option for my own Navigraph NAV Database tbh 🙂
August 20, 2025Aug 20 10 hours ago, Cloud Surfing said: In default MSFS injected traffic, there are many other, much more ridiculous things than ascending slopes 😁 But how is it related to fshud? I was wondering if FSHud 2.0 includes improved AI plane animations, in addition to improved ATC. Christopher Low AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU / 64GB DDR5-6000 RAM / 12GB Nvidia RTX 4070 Super GPU / Gigabyte X870E Aorus Elite Wifi 7 / 1+2TB Samsung Evo Plus M2 Nvme UK2000 Beta Tester
August 20, 2025Aug 20 Commercial Member 3 hours ago, Bam2000 said: Any ETA on that ? because of the Shutdown of Opensky end of August i'm searching a new ATC Tool, and Navigraph with older AIRAC is very much needed, dont want to spend 10 dollar every month on navigraph. Thinking about P2ATC 3.0 and FSHUD, more inclined to FSHUD when it will have the option for my own Navigraph NAV Database tbh 🙂 We plan to implement it until end of August.
August 20, 2025Aug 20 Hi @FSHud Do you have any plans to allow the use of ElevenLabs or other voices? Cheers, Kael Oswald 9950X3D/ 64GB DDR5 6200 @ CL30 / Custom Water Loop / RTX 5090 / 3 x 48" LG C4 OLEDs
August 20, 2025Aug 20 Commercial Member 7 hours ago, KL Oo said: Hi @FSHud Do you have any plans to allow the use of ElevenLabs or other voices? Cheers, We currently allow to use Windows Installed voices. There are many add-on voices that can be installed in Windows and you can use them from FSHud. As for ElevenLabs - it does require a subscription and payment for generation. We are not interested in such business model, because there is many disadvantages. However, voices will be improved during the roadmap.
August 20, 2025Aug 20 4 hours ago, FSHud said: As for ElevenLabs - it does require a subscription and payment for generation. We are not interested in such business model, because there is many disadvantages. However, voices will be improved during the roadmap. Thanks for the reply. I just wanted to point out (although I'm sure you know) that the cost of an ElevenLabs subscritpion is born by the user and could be accessed by FSHud by the ElevenLabs API. Similar to what Self Loading Cargo or the new Cabin Announcements from flightsim.to program does. Just food for thought. Cheers Kael Oswald 9950X3D/ 64GB DDR5 6200 @ CL30 / Custom Water Loop / RTX 5090 / 3 x 48" LG C4 OLEDs
August 21, 2025Aug 21 Commercial Member 5 hours ago, KL Oo said: Thanks for the reply. I just wanted to point out (although I'm sure you know) that the cost of an ElevenLabs subscritpion is born by the user and could be accessed by FSHud by the ElevenLabs API. Similar to what Self Loading Cargo or the new Cabin Announcements from flightsim.to program does. Just food for thought. Cheers I completely agree with you, but in those add-ons there’s much less communication compared to an ATC program (including traffic conversations). That’s why the free ElevenLabs packages can run out quickly.
August 21, 2025Aug 21 2 hours ago, FSHud said: I completely agree with you, but in those add-ons there’s much less communication compared to an ATC program (including traffic conversations). That’s why the free ElevenLabs packages can run out quickly. Agreed - It can. However ultimately the decision to use ElevenLabs (or a similar service) would be for the user. FSHud would clearly not require it, rather it would be an option. A bit like BATC has the option to purchase premium characters for users who want that. Anyway, just something to consider. Kael Oswald 9950X3D/ 64GB DDR5 6200 @ CL30 / Custom Water Loop / RTX 5090 / 3 x 48" LG C4 OLEDs
September 1, 2025Sep 1 Commercial Member On 8/18/2025 at 7:19 PM, jcomm said: My only problem with FSHUD is that I have to have an active Navigraph subscription for it to work 😞 I sometimes don't, so, I can't use FSHUD .... BATC and AFAIK SI use SimBrief but don not require active Navigraph subscriptions. On 8/19/2025 at 10:18 AM, jcomm said: 🙏 This would surely bring me back to FSHUD !!! We’ve added an option to load Navdata from a file - no active Navigraph subscription required.
September 7, 2025Sep 7 On 01.09.2025 at 12:52, FSHud said: Мы добавили возможность загрузки навигационных данных из файла — активная подписка на Navigraph не требуется. Hello! I recently purchased FSHUD, and I’m interested in how to input my own navigation data. I want to figure this out, but I don’t understand where to get these files, what file format the archive should be, or where to obtain it at all. Thank you very much for your product—it has taken the level of flying in the simulator to a whole new level—but I would really like to clarify this point regarding the navigation data. Thank you in advance for your response!
Create an account or sign in to comment