1 hour ago, Fiorentoni said:

Yes, it will adapt to your in-sim time (a bit like AIG did previously). Or do you mean historical weather? No, that no (I still do it nonetheless for 24h max, winds usually don't change drastically over a day)

That's great. Hopefully historical weather will be implemented in the future - perhaps ASFS integration. 

I notice a significant drop in FPS if use Beyond ATC.  I will try to lower the traffic settings but BATC eats frames like there is no tomorrow.  My frames went from 20 to 30 when i exited the app on approach. I will try 20% traffic and see if that improves FPS. It’s a cool feature but you pay the price with frames.

2 hours ago, Huascar said:

I notice a significant drop in FPS if use Beyond ATC.  I will try to lower the traffic settings but BATC eats frames like there is no tomorrow.  My frames went from 20 to 30 when i exited the app on approach. I will try 20% traffic and see if that improves FPS. It’s a cool feature but you pay the price with frames.

I use BATC all the time I usually get 40 fps with ai traffic at 4 on everything.

I don't know what i get, since i never check my fps.

Edited January 15, 20251 yr by pete_auau

57 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said:

use BATC all the time I usually get 40 fps with ai traffic at 4 on everything.

I have my settings at 9, that explains it

Mine is at 5 but haven't compared different settings 

2 hours ago, Huascar said:

I have my settings at 9, that explains it

5 is the advised setting (to start with). I have enroute traffic at 3 to prevent ATC from talking too much when on Center (which can become annoying, specially with the rather slow basic voices). Things are a little quit in the ground but that's also because I usually visit smaller airports.

18 hours ago, Tom Wright said:

In that case the traffic you're seeing isn't from BATC. All of the traffic disappears as soon as I quit BATC. You must have something else injecting traffic or it's from within MSFS itself.

I'm afraid you missed the distinction:  I stated when I turn traffic in BATC to OFF, they don't disappear.  You're referring to when you QUIT BATC.

33 minutes ago, Noel said:

I'm afraid you missed the distinction:  I stated when I turn traffic in BATC to OFF, they don't disappear.  You're referring to when you QUIT BATC.

If you turn to off and they don't disappear, usually means you have another injector working(msfs, fsltl, etc) or, for some reason, your command doesn't reach the sim....

Edited January 15, 20251 yr by Bond

1 hour ago, Bond said:

If you turn to off and they don't disappear, usually means you have another injector working(msfs, fsltl, etc) or, for some reason, your command doesn't reach the sim....

I don't have another injector for certain, and I note traffic is being controlled by BATC.   This was just tried after a new install so maybe it is working as it's supposed to now after a few flights.  So when you turn off traffic in app do planes quickly disappear?

Why I need this capability has to do with the fact I detest GSX's arrival marshal actions and prefer to use MSFS' and always have.  Today after landing at KLAS I use MSFS ATC to see which arrival gate it directs me to there MSFS marshals will direct me in and so can convey that to BATC for guidance to that gate.  Problem was today BATC had put a static or live plane in that gate so it would have been useful to have traffic removed so I could use the gate.

Cheers

Edited January 15, 20251 yr by Noel

49 minutes ago, Noel said:

So when you turn off traffic in app do planes quickly disappear?

Immediately, yes.

How do you know they are controlled by BATC? Do they talk?

50 minutes ago, Noel said:

 Problem was today BATC had put a static or live plane in that gate so it would have been useful to have traffic removed so I could use the gate.

Cheers

If that really was a BATC plane (which should not happen, BATC should never inject into your assigned gate), you can use the new version of the BATC external map to simply remove that traffic by selecting it on the map and click "remove".

34 minutes ago, Fiorentoni said:

BATC should never inject into your assigned gate

But...BATC originally assigned a different gate, and because one can request a different gate than was assigned that's what I did.  Does that explain it?

36 minutes ago, Fiorentoni said:

How do you know they are controlled by BATC? Do they talk?

Because I can hear ATC talking to other planes and I can identify their liveries as correctly matching what BATC is saying if that makes sense.

MSFS traffic has been off since originally installing FSLTL models and injector.  Prior to installing BATC I removed FSLTL's injector outright, didn't just disable it.

Rechecked this just now:  turning traffic OFF in BATC does not remove the planes spawned when I started BATC.  Here's where I just tested this and sure enough ATC is directing pushbacks etc:

Edited January 15, 20251 yr by Noel

28 minutes ago, Noel said:

But...BATC originally assigned a different gate, and because one can request a different gate than was assigned that's what I did.  Does that explain it?

Hm I don't know the implementation, but I would have thought in that case BATC would simply remove any aircraft from the new gate. So you might have found a bug.

1 hour ago, Noel said:

Today after landing at KLAS I use MSFS ATC to see which arrival gate it directs me to there MSFS marshals will direct me in and so can convey that to BATC for guidance to that gate.  Problem was today BATC had put a static or live plane in that gate so it would have been useful to have traffic removed so I could use the gate.

Are you using MSFS2020 or MSFS2024? Don't you need to have airport traffic enabled in order to see those marshals?