Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Same here, what a pain. I learned long time ago, re-instilling flt sim is a waste of valuable time to fix issues.
  3. jcomm

    ORBX.

    ROGER that πŸ˜‰
  4. G-RFRY

    ORBX.

    Let`s not go down the this and that sim AGAIN. It`s about ORBX 3D.
  5. They posted a picture of the right hand landing gear on their Discord and invited people to guess what it was. It didn't take long πŸ™‚
  6. Will the answer still be hilariously unrelated to the question asked, a decent percentage of the time? 😁
  7. The video said that 50% of the current monthly charges goes to ChatGPT. So 15$ out of the 30$. This if ChatGPT 4o gets 50% cheaper and assuming SI.AI forwards this to clients then the subscription may come down to some 23$
  8. No, it was with Basic voices. Strangely, the initial responses were rapid-fire, but by mid-flight they stretched into minutes.
  9. Is it with Premium voices? If yes, try Basics as it could solve your problem.
  10. Thanks for the link! Google Translate gave the following translation for that article: I think the article writer misinterpreted the video. But at least that is cleared up πŸ‘
  11. [...] Reduzierung der monatlichen Nutzungskosten auf 15 Dollar zu erwarten, wie Brian im Video erklΓ€rt [...] Yeah that is a big misinterpretation of what Brian actually said in the video.
  12. I got this from the German-language flight simulation site cruiselevel.de: https://cruiselevel.de/sayintentions-mit-neuester-ki-anbindung/ Appears they got this wrong or interpreted something into the statements that wasn't said. Sorry for spreading wrong information.
  13. So... I spontaneously decided to use BATC for an approach into Kathmandu (only visual, VOR and RNAV available). And started BATC mid-flight. I was able to select cruise phase, and got some initial vectoring and an altitude. Then nothing. Not sure what happened, but the Indian accents were quite nice. Eventually I just quit BATC and chose a VOR approach.
  14. Hello everyone, I've recently downloaded the demo of AaO having been a long time user of another axis management plugin. I've so far managed to get axis assignments on the yoke portion of the Velocity one working, along with a number of buttons, but cannot get the throttles/vernier controls or buttons on the throttle bit to be picked up. It makes no difference in or out of sim, this behaviour is the same - but the devices are all responding to input fine in the controller dialog in Windows and if they have they are managed out of MSFS' controls dialog or the other axis management plugin (and yes, I have checked that both those alternatives are disabled before enabling AaO). AaO does recognise the device as a "gamepad", but doesn't recognise any input at all, even disabling all the other devices I have connected. I am using the Asobo Beech default to configure AaO. Has anyone else successfully configured this hardware? I've found some older posts here regarding the trim wheel, but those all suggest that they have been able to successfully set up the throttles and yoke. Having a root around in the xml files, both the yoke and throttle (listed as gamepad) have almost identical GUIDs, I think just a few characters difference. Can anyone help me figure out what I am doing wrong or what I have missed? Thank you, Louise
  15. Today
  16. Thanks, that's what I thought too. I can't see SayIntentions.AI dropping the price to $15 USD. Maybe they can drop it to $22 USD or $20 USD, but the OpenAI costs are just a portion of the costs SayIntentions.AI is using. Maybe @martinboehme can provide a link to where the $15 USD information came from.
  17. What would be good to know is if any of these teams are AI teams πŸ€”
  18. I don't think they have 500, or even 700 people working on it full time. The assumption is, some of those 700 people are working on it part time.
  19. I feel like "700 people" on FS2024 is probably a big exaggeration. If there really was 700 people working on FS2024, and then you take out the architects / leads, program managers and testers etc, you would (conservatively) have at least 500 active coding developers working on it. That would be some heck of a sim for FS2024. It is head spinning.
  20. you won't need ATC anymore in 5 years, and you won't have to pilot anymore. all done by AI, all autonomously. MSFS will be a pure scenery explorer, just what the x-planers have said all along. 🀣 no need to fly to attend a business meeting, all decisions will be made by AI, you'll only have to sign the finished papers, press hard, 5 copies. and best of all, no need for an expensive home pc anymore, everything will be pre-decided and calculated, all processes and visuals generated by AI and streamed to your doorsteps. and we all will be gone fishing. Paradise !
  21. Your information is old. 700 people was from the April, 2024 Twitch Q&A. Jorg said it himself. You can read the transcript here: Obviously, some of them are on contract, and when MSFS 2024 is finished and maybe after the first few Sim Updates come in, those contracts will end.
  22. Right now, BeyondATC is unusable for me. Initially the responses are speedy, but over time they become more and more delayed. So I'm having to end the program in mid-flight. Maybe the latest version (Fixed a couple bugs with the program getting stuck on "Submitting Response" or "Generating Speech.") will remedy that; I'll try later today. But meanwhile, I had an almost perfect IFR flight yesterday with Say Intentions from EGLL to EGPD, including flawless vectors to the ILS amounting to a 180 degree turn. My only quibbles, apart from the slow but consistent response time, were being told to contact Scottish Control whilst still well inside England, and climb instructions that were a bit too small and frequent. And the latest GPT-4o announcement pointing towards faster responses and lower costs is very encouraging for Say Intentions.
  23. This been stated a few times lately. Here is the Official word: Now I don't know exactly what they mean by But I think it's reasonable to assume that this figure includes marketing departments, website developers, social media employees and probably a host of departments I've never even heard of. You have to read the wording as carefully as it is written "working to make" is not the same as "working on" Somehow Chinese whispers and repetition have ended up making "700 working" on a 'fact' for some.
  1. Load more activity
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...