Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Instead of monkeying around with our computers Asobo needs to fix what they broke (and fire the incompetent member on the team that did this).🧐 I see no reason this so called update was released to non-beta installs especially if it wasn't QA checked first.
  3. I have the same situation. All other works perfect. Every start i must change from Windows Mode to Full Screen Mode. I hope there will be a fix for this bad problem.
  4. Thanks for posting that. it looks the same as my 12 version, with 1 assigned to both roll and pitch axes while 2 is for the hat. Heres the rub; when I press the buttons on the yoke it highlights the next highest number in the blue circle after hat number 2. button pressed.......... blue circle higlighted 3 -> Circle does not flash on and off but stays lit. 4 -> 5 5 -> 6 6 -> 7 7 -> 8 8 -> 9 9 -> 10 10 -> No highlighted circle. Nothing happens when pressing button 10 on the yoke per the image. Xplane 11 is quite different. I get only numbers up to 9. The two axes are using numbers 1 and 2. The hat is assigned to number 1. Then there are blue circles 2 thru 9....there is no 10 in a blue circle that appears. Each button from 3 to 9 highlights the correct blue circle. Button 2 does nothing. Instead of just the two columns Device ----> Assignments there are 3 columns Device ------> Axes --------> Assignments No image available------> No. 1 = Roll No. 1= Hat No. 2 = Pitch No. 2 = no highlighting (btn0) No. 3 = 3 (btn1) No. 4 = 4 (btn2) and so forth up to blue circle 9 (btn7)...... There is not a blue circle with a 10. Perhaps the yoke controller is faulty. Whatever is going on it aint right.
  5. @Cruachan, Mike, since my original post I’ve discovered the problem will also occur when changing vehicles inside the sim irrespective of whether P3D is launched independently or via SSNG. Switching to the avatar broke the connection allowing SODE to show the test message. Maybe it’s a genuine bug. I’ve compared my Prepar3D.cfg from SSNG and the one in my profile and they’re virtually identical with only a couple of minor differences.
  6. Very good shots PM! πŸ™‚ I like that second wingview with the nice watercolors, looks perfect.
  7. Don't most of these modules state compatibility wit both MSFS and XPlane?, if they can work with sims from 2 different companies with different coding I don't see that compatibility with MS's latest version will be a problem and of course there is always FSUIPC to lend a hand
  8. Great set, I also like the shots of the large tunnel entrance there and all the facilities. The DC3 in msfs looks good but compared with the Aeroworx in XP the flight dynamics and other details can be well improved.
  9. The F14 always was an impressive fihgter. And another good paint here.
  10. I can understand it could frustrating to be constantly subjected to my ridiculous high-end tests. Not thinking about you specifically, but I've had some reactions - especially after being one of the first on Avsim MSFS to share how things changed after I got the 4090. I will say this though: this insane test put a load on my rig akin to some 3rd party torture tests, and the case fans sounded like an A300 taking off! Not only that - twice did MSFS CTD with the "your graphics card encountered a problem" error message. And twice - as I got too ambitious with TLODs and OLODs, Windows became irrevocably unresponsive, requiring a forced reboot πŸ€ͺ I really hope I didn't fry my CPU doing this!
  11. Today
  12. Some good shots and the Dove looks nice, did you create the paint yourself? I've used the zoom functions in your flickr and looks great.
  13. I can only dream of a system that is capable of such things πŸ™„ Maybe one day!
  14. I finished another test: TLOD and photogrammetry. Observations: TLOD has a huge impact on how PG-buildings are being rendered. TLOD affects terrain draw distance, PG level of detail as well as PG draw distance OLOD does not affect PG whatsoever
  15. Very nice shots again PM, interesting light! πŸ™‚
  16. This is for XPlane 12 edit ... I recall having a discussion re the Yoke config (image) with regards to xplane 11, The developer informed me he had sent the info to LR but it was only included in xplane 12. I do not have xp 11 installed so I can't confirm that.
  17. I've completed yet another rigorous test session, and to be honest I was surprised by what I found. Video first, then my observations. Observations: TLOD has a huge impact on how PG-buildings are being rendered. TLOD affects terrain draw distance, PG level of detail as well as PG draw distance OLOD does not affect PG whatsoever Rendering PG-buildings is a very CPU-intensive task. This huge increase in PG level of detail increased the load significantly on almost all of the 12900KF's 16 P-core threads, increasing temperatures (occasionally hitting TjMax at 100 degrees celcius) and fan noise. After the rendering was complete though, the CPU load settled on a much lower level. The GPU load was not significantly affected by this. However, the impact on VRAM usage was massive, from 12.5GB to 20.5GB. Next one up is OLOD πŸ€“ Btw I'm finally on 0.4.3.1-test.
  18. Hi, I would just like to say that I have been using MSFS2020 AutoFPS since the beginning, and I am now on 0.4.3.1 test, and it is working flawlessly. I am not using expert mode and I am not using Auto Target FPS. I have 30 FPS set as the target (I have a modest system running in 4k). I fly both airliners and GA, plus some plane spotting with PSXT, and I use for VFR and IFR modes as needed. Your program has been a 'life saver' for me which is allowing me to continue using my current system for a little longer before the 'big upgrade' when I have saved up the money. Thank you. EDIT: I also use DLSS Ultra Quality mode set at .8 which is working very well.
  19. Easy to answer Bernd, we today are not on the happy side. The modern technology makes them all short of time. Short of time to do something, short of time to react to something, short of time to create something and so on. And at the end it's no advantage because to have some time alvailable has always been a gauge for happiness. And regarding business it's not an advantage as well because you can make money as soon as your services are up to date. Regardless what that meant in this or any time.
  20. Thank's a lot Bernd, I think I remember your great post, you did some Penguins shots as well if I am right. It's always great to see these funny creatures. πŸ™‚ The Dash 7 by Pilots is clearly a recommendable addon for a reasonable price. Thank you and you are right. Had some difficulties there with the Bell 407 but not with the old Bell 47. Must try it again later.
  21. Also related to this topic, I noticed some DCS World developers like Heatblur jumping into MSFS. And didn't WinWing mostly make hardware for military flight sims (ie. DCS World?). I just noticed that WinWing came out with their first hardware for MSFS.
  22. Thank's a lot John! When all the old sceneries will hopefully work in v6 once it will be stunning with the new light. Have to learn how to adjust it best because it's a system featuring a few sliders more...πŸ™‚ But compared with msfs you can adjust it, in msfs you can adjust nothing regarding the light. As I often said, I really cannot understand how they can do such a large application and not even add a little panel to adjust brightness, contrast, saturation, bloom and so on. Is that difficult to do? I even have it in P3dv3. Thank you P_7878, it's really a very nice scenery there. And the aircraft is available for msfs but may look a bit different in textures. Thank you Bernd, it's not your monitor, the outside views here are too dark and not enough contrast. This was shortly after installing the sim first and I'am learning how to adjust the new light system.
  23. Correct and you can use xcsl with vatsim and real traffic
  24. SkyNet will be selfaware in 2025 Humans will be obsolete.πŸ’€
  25. I only use it for the sounds and the camera shake. Always thought it was great and an essential addon. I run a batch file with all the startup programs (MSFS, TrackIR, AIFlow, FSRealistic etc) . Always been fine for what I need. The F thing just zooms me right out, which I always got a little annoyed with if I was in say off in a window and typing something, but just needs mouse-rolling back in. Not annoying enough to go hunt for a keybind yet
  26. I own the PMDG 737-800 for MSFS. And I have never started it up from cold, and I don't know if I will ever learn to, even though I was watching Fabio (the streamer who is also a CFI in real life) teach how to start it from cold. For the record, I am more interested in learning how to start up a Cessna 152 or Cessna 172 up from cold, because that is probably what I will do if I ever go to flight school. I will never fly a real 737 in my lifetime, so I am not as interested to learn how to start a 737 up from cold, whereas I might fly a real Cessna 152 or 172 one day, so it's more important that I learn how to start those up from cold (I only fly the Cessna 172 on VATSIM, I have never flown the PMDG 737-800 on VATSIM before). I usually start the PMDG 737-800 with all systems and engines running when I spawn into MSFS. Having said that, I like that I am using the same PMDG 737-800 that real life 737 pilots like Stearmandriver are using. When I watch Stearmandriver stream the PMDG 737-800 on his livestream, I know that I can do everything that he does as well, and all that functionality is there in the PMDG 737-800 that I am using too. I paid for the PMDG 737-800 knowing that it has very realistic systems and avionics, even though I may never learn them, and that real life 737 pilots like Stearmandriver have a very high opinion of the PMDG 737. If A2A comes out with the Cessna 172 for MSFS, it's an automatic buy for me. I actually do want to learn the Cessna 172 more in depth, so I really hope that A2A does the Cessna 172 for their next project.
  27. Nice to see this app is evolving so fast. I am going to try the demo after they will have implemented the control of AI aircraft and things have matured for a while. On the other hand I just can't imagine myself paying $30 a month for this, no matter how good it is. So hopefully they find a way to significantly lower the price some day.
  1. Load more activity
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...