If for example, the EGPWS Peaks Display was not available on the PFD because developmental resources were diverted to texturing some seats, then I for one would not be happy, and I suspect I'm in the majority there too.Al

Amen! If I wanted a cabin... I'd move to the mountains.

Is the Woodpigeon going to have 2D pop up displays of the panel?

Never thought I would see you in the pro Woodpigeon camp. You're ok with it being FSX only? :(

An FSX only Woodpigeon? I guess so, say by the way; did it have to be hand propped or did it have a starter?

I will take more functionality of VC and systmes over a virtual cabin every day and twice on Sunday.

OK :( The old 737 had also a virtual cabin and the fps be very good. The virtual cabin simply belongs to it to a good airplane. Therefore, I will not buy the new 737! SorryBye from GermanyAndi

Bye from Singapore, we won't miss you :). Giving up a great airplane in looks and systems functionality because it doesn't have a few polygons with textures that'll just hamper performance is quite short sighted, don't ya think?Karan

I LOVE the old 737 and the 747 from PMDG :( the 737/747 is very complex and have a virtual cabin.Airsimmer make an extreme outside model with a virtual cabin and professional Systems

I will never "fly" from the cabin.. however being to see through the aircrfat from the outside (like the newly PMDG 747-800) brings so much reality so this is a must !!!!Gregory

...The old 737 had also a virtual cabin and the fps be very good.

Why on earth...is virtual cabin so important you!?! :(

I LOVE the old 737 and the 747 from PMDG :( the 737/747 is very complex and have a virtual cabin.Airsimmer make an extreme outside model with a virtual cabin and professional Systems

First of all, the 747 and 737 pale in comparison to the detail that will be seen on the NG2.0. The original NG has a very flat VC, go compare it to the MD or the JS and you will see what I meanAirsimmer? From what I hear the failed to live up to their promise of "No compromise". They have a wonderful 3dsMax model (Including VC) and fell short of some of the advanced featues they were expected to model.

I LOVE the old 737 and the 747 from PMDG :( the 737/747 is very complex and have a virtual cabin.Airsimmer make an extreme outside model with a virtual cabin and professional Systems

What Airsimmer product are you flying? The product that I and many others have won't even make it to the TOC without a CTD. I won't even go into your "professional systems" statement. Sure, it has a fully modeled cabin until you lock the cockpit door...then it disappears. If it's the wingviews you're after, there are several products that will get you wingviews without having a cabin. Also, the 747 doesn't have a full cabin. Just the upper deck is modeledAnd I don't remember who it was that said that most of the buttons in the CS757 are nonfunctional, but you must be mistaking it with the Qualitywings 757...because the 757 I have has 99% flightdeck functionality. And it's for fs9Matt L

i have the 757 Captain from Just flightgreat plane, extiror and interior, panel and systems are good. but its unflyable due to the virtual cabinand the FSX vertion dose not give you the option to get rid of it. it would be fine if it did not have a Virtual Cabinthe only use for a virtual cabin is recording videos. this aircraft is for Virtual Pilotswe play Flight Simulator, caues we like to flywe dont play Passenger Simulator, if we wanted to sit in a First class seat whatching the attractive flight attendents, wed buy a ticket for a real flight.

Is the Woodpigeon going to have 2D pop up displays of the panel?

And does it also have the option for a efis-panel?? :( Wijnand (EHBK)

Why on earth...is virtual cabin so important you!?! :(

I could not care less about the virtual cabin. But what about the POGOSTICK???

Everybody seems to be overlooking the most important requirement.Will it have a flushing toilet as provided in the Flight1 ATR 72-500?