August 20, 201510 yr [Pc Intel i3-4160 3,6 GHz, 8 GB di RAM, GeForce RTX-3060 12 GB, Win10 Home 64 bit]
August 21, 201510 yr Author ... and low altitude [Pc Intel i3-4160 3,6 GHz, 8 GB di RAM, GeForce RTX-3060 12 GB, Win10 Home 64 bit]
August 21, 201510 yr Awesome!!! Looks like real. :wub: :wub: :wub: José Luís | Flightsimulator: | MSFS | Add-Ons: | PMDG Douglas DC-6 | PMDG 737-700 | Fenix A320 | Maddog X MD82| FSW CESSNA 414AW CHANCELLOR ||
August 21, 201510 yr Nice shots. That's one of the things that bothers me with FSX/P3D: even when you're at 35,000 feet, it looks like you're at 10,000. Greg Montey "Because with great power, comes great responsitriligence..."
August 21, 201510 yr Great looking shots. Intel i-9 13900KF @ 6.0 Ghz, MSI RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid X 24GB, MSI MAG CORELIQUID C360, MSI Z790 A-PRO WIFI, MSI MPG A1000G 1000W, G.SKILL 48Gb@76000 MHz DDR5, MSI SPATIUM M480 PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 2TB, Windows 11 Pro Ghost Spectre x64 “We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the day and night to visit violence on those who would do us harm”.
August 21, 201510 yr As one who has tried unsuccessfully..and given up trying to use the X-Plane (9 and now 10.36)interface as being too hard , these images have rekindled my interest. Can I ask what addons/scenery/aircraft/tweaks are needed to get to this standard. steve s
August 21, 201510 yr Commercial Member Nice shots! Those are default clouds, right? I'm very curious as to what location these are in. Jim Stewart Milviz Person.
August 21, 201510 yr As one who has tried unsuccessfully..and given up trying to use the X-Plane (9 and now 10.36)interface as being too hard , these images have rekindled my interest. Can I ask what addons/scenery/aircraft/tweaks are needed to get to this standard. steve s what part of the UI do you find too hard? at the forums we can always help.i do agree with you that xplane UI is not as easy as FSX but you can definitely get the hang of it if you spend a couple of hours
August 21, 201510 yr Nice shots. That's one of the things that bothers me with FSX/P3D: even when you're at 35,000 feet, it looks like you're at 10,000. Yea! I always noticed that too. It always bugged me. If Microsoft was still developing flight sim they probably could improve on this.
August 21, 201510 yr Author Looks incredible. Is that the W2XP scenery? Affermative. W2xp with Alpinox HD mesh v3. Textures default. Nice shots! Those are default clouds, right? I'm very curious as to what location these are in. Confirm, freeware clouds. The first 2 image, location is Lake Maggiore (italy) mountain. The image low fly, location is Lake Garda (italy). [Pc Intel i3-4160 3,6 GHz, 8 GB di RAM, GeForce RTX-3060 12 GB, Win10 Home 64 bit]
August 21, 201510 yr Also should be noted the shots are using Real Terra Haze which provides the great atmospherics. i910900k, RTX 3090, 32GB DDR4 RAM, AW3423DW, Ruddy girt big mug of Yorkshire Tea
August 21, 201510 yr Author As one who has tried unsuccessfully..and given up trying to use the X-Plane (9 and now 10.36)interface as being too hard , these images have rekindled my interest. Can I ask what addons/scenery/aircraft/tweaks are needed to get to this standard. steve s To obtain this result not need anything. All freeware. Real terra haze is freeware. W2xp and mesh hd v3 are freeware. Clouds is freeware. Sky is freeware. Terrain textures are default (i not use photoreal scenery or simheaven). Water is default. Only Carenado aircraft is payware. [Pc Intel i3-4160 3,6 GHz, 8 GB di RAM, GeForce RTX-3060 12 GB, Win10 Home 64 bit]
Create an account or sign in to comment