February 25, 20188 yr Spent most of the night trying to make it work, I get a CTD loading the airport in. There is a thread on the forums about it no resolution in sight yet. Thomas Derbyshire
February 25, 20188 yr Are you running 4.1? Cheers,John TavendaleTextures by Tavers - https://www.facebook.com/texturesbytavers
February 25, 20188 yr Nope 4.2, first time I have had any issues installed scenery in v4 period. Thomas Derbyshire
February 25, 20188 yr Does it install with the new add-on folder method or directly on P3D folder? Edited February 25, 20188 yr by simbio
February 25, 20188 yr 9 hours ago, flytrumpet767 said: Which makes me wonder. Who can run it with all the features smoothly? Anyway, I also turned down features and I’m pretty happy with it. Did a really nice night landing, and it was pretty smooth, so it’s all good. Just wondering if we’ll ever have systems that can allow us to enable every features on those amazing sceneries. I'm sure someone will come along and tell you with an i3 and 2 gig of ram they can get 427fps. Then they will show you some graphs and tell you 'everyones computer is different' That's what normally happens. Back to topic. When we used to have the 340-300 we used to get loads of ASRs from captains because the KBOS controllers used to want us to use the shorter runway in KBOS for landing and the controllers always wanted you to keep the speed up which on the 343 was an issue due to energy management. God the amount of hassle the 343 caused in Boston. Halcyon days I'm getting old.. An other story for you. Think it was the Christmas of 2006 I was cabin crew on a 2 nighter (due Christmas) in Boston. 6 of us took a mini van upto Stowe in vermont and had stayed over night and did a days skiing the following day. After lunchtime beers, On the chair lift the first officer had the hire car keys in his pocket and they fell out. Absolutle Nightmare. We got stuck in Stowe as it was Christmas day and the hire car company had to send us some new keys. It put a 16 hour delay onto our flight. All 6 of us when we got back where called onto the office and give an absolute bollocking. And there's me now moaning about crew!! Edited February 25, 20188 yr by tooting
February 25, 20188 yr Very nice airport. The ground textures are lovely, especially the coastline around the airport. Lots of great little details tha makes for a fun ride with the R22 exploring every nook and cranny this airport has to offer. It does have a significant fps impact (even with some of the options turned off), but as long as I keep the clouds away I manage around 17-20fps with UTL traffic enabled. I also have ORBX Vector and Open LC running. But for those flying study level aircraft, I hope you are on nuclear power! I don't like that FlyTampa installs inside the P3D main folder, but I do like their hassle free DRM system with a single activation code, and off you go. Simmerhead - Making the virtual skies unsafe since 1987!
February 25, 20188 yr 5 hours ago, sidfadc said: Spent most of the night trying to make it work, I get a CTD loading the airport in. There is a thread on the forums about it no resolution in sight yet. Looks like this might be resolved by disabling collision detection according to the FT forum. Thomas Derbyshire
February 25, 20188 yr I flew into KBOS twice yesterday and have to say this is there best scenery to date. I get great performance with most items checked. The only thing I did not like was the overpowering photo-real ground lights surrounding the airport. I solved this option by renaming one of the files so Orbx lights were the primary. They did a great job with Boston. Dan i9-13900K / Asus Maximus Hero Z790 / RTX 4090 FE / G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 64 GB DDR5-6400 CL32 / Artic Liquid Freezer II 360 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / EVGA 1000W G3, 80+ Gold / Phanteks Eclipse P600S ATX Mid Tower / Arctic P14 PWM Case Fans / LG C2 42 Inch Class 4K OLED TV/Monitor / Windows 11 Pro / 1Ghz AT&T Fiber
February 25, 20188 yr PMDG NGX misty weather (ASP4/SF3D) PATC approach at 04R (sight below 0.5 nm). What a great experience. Performance is acceptable (20-22 fps) with UTL active (70-80 a/c). Due to weather conditions I did not see much from the airport. But it feels so real ...! I'm loving it. - Harry 9800x3D (Strix x870e-E) - 64GB RAM (DDR5 6000, CL 30) - RTX 5090, 34'' 1440p OLED HDR - Windows 11 Pro (1TB M.2) - MSFS 2024 (MS Store, 4TB M.2).
February 25, 20188 yr I notice FlyTampa also seem to get the AFCAD right. The major airlines seem to park at the right gates. Simmerhead - Making the virtual skies unsafe since 1987!
February 25, 20188 yr FlyTampa is a leader in afcads. If you go to their forum you can download a package of files that you can switch out depending on wind conditions for accurate runways assignments. That’s a level of effort that most developers don’t go to. Dave Current System (Running at 4k): ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F, Ryzen 7800X3D, RTX 5090, 55" Samsung Q80T, 64GB DDR5 6000 RAM, EVGA CLC 280mm AIO Cooler, Brunner CLS-E NG Yoke, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS & Stick, Thrustmaster TCA Quadrant & Add-on, VirtualFly Ruddo+, TQ6+ and Yoko+, GoFlight MCP-PRO and EFIS, Skalarki FCU and MCDU
February 25, 20188 yr 6 hours ago, simmerhead said: I don't like that FlyTampa installs inside the P3D main folder, but I do like their hassle free DRM system with a single activation code, and off you go. I must correct this mistake. Even though the main P3D folder is chosen by the installer by default, it is possible to install the scenery outside of P3D. An add-on.xml file is created by the installer! Very nice! Simmerhead - Making the virtual skies unsafe since 1987!
February 25, 20188 yr 10 minutes ago, regis9 said: FlyTampa is a leader in afcads. If you go to their forum you can download a package of files that you can switch out depending on wind conditions for accurate runways assignments. That’s a level of effort that most developers don’t go to. Really don't understand why other devs screw this up... When you put so much work into all the details, why leave out the AI traffic patterns... Simmerhead - Making the virtual skies unsafe since 1987!
February 25, 20188 yr 44 minutes ago, regis9 said: FlyTampa is a leader in afcads. If you go to their forum you can download a package of files Actually these are not Flytampa's AFCADs. They are made by atco who is a well-known contributor to our hobby (AFCADs, AI traffic, repaints, etc). Edited February 25, 20188 yr by Rafal
February 25, 20188 yr 5 hours ago, Wise87 said: I flew into KBOS twice yesterday and have to say this is there best scenery to date. I get great performance with most items checked. The only thing I did not like was the overpowering photo-real ground lights surrounding the airport. I solved this option by renaming one of the files so Orbx lights were the primary. They did a great job with Boston. How do you disable these? I agree, as much as I love FT airports I have never liked their bright night textures that surround them. I wish they could include an option to disable them in their configurator tool or somehow provide ORBX blending. I generally do not like photoreal textures around addon airports. Eric i9-12900k, RTX 5070ti OC, 32GB ddr5 5600 RAM, 2TB 980 Pro SSD, Titan 240RX AIO, Samsung CRG90 49", Win 11
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.