Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The AVSIM Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

QualityWings 787 Service Pack Released

Featured Replies

9 hours ago, honanhal said:

Haven’t flown the plane (or any other for that matter!) in a while, but as I recall this would have been in VNAV SPD, since it’s an above-path descent. I hadn’t heard winds programmed in the FMC could mess with this, so that’s a possibility.

I’m totally willing to believe it’s me and not the plane, but I can’t really come up with a reason why you’d program an autopilot mode this way (either simulated or real). If you’re above the path, you want your engines at idle as your starting point in a VNAV mode, at least classically. I’d genuinely be curious to hear thinking on why you wouldn’t want them at idle in this scenario. Maybe I don’t understand the 787 autopilot or am otherwise missing something. In any case, the result for me flying this plane was always that once I was above the path it was almost impossible to get back on it without building in extra track miles or switching to a different autopilot mode. Not at all the case in any other simulated Boeing I’ve flown, even the slippery ones.

Generally, putting engines into high idle is done to reduce the engine spool-up time...it's common to see this measure applied in automated acft when configured with high-drag devices.  It's done as a safety measure in case the pilot were to need to quickly add power (wind shear, engine failure, uncommanded thrust reverser deployment, or maybe just got too slow on the approach).  The difference in acceleration time from flight idle as compared to high idle in a high-bypass turbofan can be an agonizing...and critical...long time to get the power up when you need it.

Regards

Bob Scott | President and CEO, AVSIM Inc
ATP Gulfstream II-III-IV-V

Sys1 (MSFS20+24/XPlane12+11): AMD 9800X3D, water 2x240mm, MSI MPG X670E Carbon, 64GB GSkill 6000/30, nVidia RTX4090FE
Alienware AW3821DW 38" 21:9 GSync, 2x4TB Crucial T705 PCIe5 + 2x2TB Samsung 990 SSD, EVGA 1000P2 PSU, 12.9" iPad Pro
Thrustmaster TCA Boeing Yoke, TCA Airbus Sidestick, Twin TCA Airbus Throttle quads, PFC Cirrus Pedals, Coolermaster HAF932 case

Sys2 (P3Dv5/v4): i9-13900KS, water 2x360mm, ASUS Z790 Hero, 32GB GSkill 7800MHz CAS36, ASUS RTX4090
Samsung 55" JS8500 4K TV@60Hz,
3x 2TB WD SN850X 1x 4TB Crucial P3 M.2 NVME SSD, EVGA 1600T2 PSU
Fiber link to Yamaha RX-V467 Home Theater Receiver, Polk/Klipsch 6" bookshelf speakers, Polk 12" subwoofer, 12.9" iPad Pro
PFC yoke/throttle quad/pedals with custom Hall sensor retrofit, Thermaltake View 71 case, Stream Deck XL button box

Sys3 (DCS/P3Dv4/ATS/ETS): AMD 7800X3D, MSI MPG X870E Carbon, Noctua NH-D15S, 64GB GSkill 6000/30, EVGA RTX3090
Alienware AW3420DW 34" 21:9 GSync, Corsair HX1000i PSU, 4TB Crucial T705 PCIe5 + 2TB Samsung 970Evo Plus,
TM TCA Officer Pack
, Saitek combat pedals, TM Warthog, TM RS300 FF wheel/pedals, Coolermaster HAF XB case

  • Replies 48
  • Views 10.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
16 minutes ago, w6kd said:

Generally, putting engines into high idle is done to reduce the engine spool-up time...it's common to see this measure applied in automated acft when configured with high-drag devices.  It's done as a safety measure in case the pilot were to need to quickly add power (wind shear, engine failure, uncommanded thrust reverser deployment, or maybe just got too slow on the approach).  The difference in acceleration time from flight idle as compared to high idle in a high-bypass turbofan can be an agonizing...and critical...long time to get the power up when you need it.

Regards

Thanks, that makes a lot of sense. Certainly I’ve seen that high idle behavior for example with landing flaps set in the 777.

I do still wonder whether it’s true to the real 787 that deploying just spoilers in descent should lead to such a high idle, though.

James

Load agent not working properly for QFA9 YMML to YPPH. Back to doing it the old way.

Running i5-9600K @ 4.8ghz - 32GB DDR4 3200mhz - GTX 3070.

Has anyone gotten the QW Load Agent to work. I will load up a route and execute and then go to the LoadAgent like I saw in the video. It would load half the cargo and no fuel or it would load all the cargo and no fuel. For now I'm using the old method also. I'm seeing more reports on this and wonder if it actually worked for anyone. 

Dan

i9-13900K / Asus Maximus Hero Z790 / RTX 4090 FE / G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 64 GB DDR5-6400 CL32 / Artic Liquid Freezer II 360 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / EVGA 1000W G3, 80+ Gold / Phanteks Eclipse P600S ATX Mid Tower / Arctic P14 PWM Case Fans / LG C2 42 Inch Class 4K OLED TV/Monitor / Windows 11 Pro / 1Ghz AT&T Fiber

22 minutes ago, TalonMX said:

Has anyone gotten the QW Load Agent to work. I will load up a route and execute and then go to the LoadAgent like I saw in the video. It would load half the cargo and no fuel or it would load all the cargo and no fuel. For now I'm using the old method also. I'm seeing more reports on this and wonder if it actually worked for anyone. 

I saw on their form yesterday were one of the developers told somebody to re-download it because of that issue I believe as they made an adjustment to fix an issue with the load agent.

Eric 

 

 

I did my first flight ever with this plane yesterday and everything worked pretty well. Very happy with the software. The only thing I noticed was in turns it slowed from M.85 to M.842 and then went back to M.85.

Eric 

 

 

20 minutes ago, TalonMX said:

Has anyone gotten the QW Load Agent to work. I will load up a route and execute and then go to the LoadAgent like I saw in the video. It would load half the cargo and no fuel or it would load all the cargo and no fuel. For now I'm using the old method also. I'm seeing more reports on this and wonder if it actually worked for anyone. 

A question for everyone having issues with the update; I thought I read in the QW update notes that the update was so extensive that required you to uninstall and then reinstall from scratch. 

I haven't but haven't had a chance to fly it yet. Wondering if this step would help people? 

 

Daniel

3 minutes ago, Daniel Baker said:

A question for everyone having issues with the update; I thought I read in the QW update notes that the update was so extensive that required you to uninstall and then reinstall from scratch. 

I haven't but haven't had a chance to fly it yet. Wondering if this step would help people? 

 

Daniel

Everyone that has reported this so far has completely uninstalled and reinstalled. I should have stated that I have ran as admin, uninstalled and reinstalled numerous times, deleted old QW folders and even went as far as to clean out my registry. 

Dan

i9-13900K / Asus Maximus Hero Z790 / RTX 4090 FE / G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 64 GB DDR5-6400 CL32 / Artic Liquid Freezer II 360 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / EVGA 1000W G3, 80+ Gold / Phanteks Eclipse P600S ATX Mid Tower / Arctic P14 PWM Case Fans / LG C2 42 Inch Class 4K OLED TV/Monitor / Windows 11 Pro / 1Ghz AT&T Fiber

On 10/6/2019 at 11:43 PM, TalonMX said:

Has anyone gotten the QW Load Agent to work. I will load up a route and execute and then go to the LoadAgent like I saw in the video. It would load half the cargo and no fuel or it would load all the cargo and no fuel. For now I'm using the old method also. I'm seeing more reports on this and wonder if it actually worked for anyone. 

I got it to work. Basically it doesn't work with certain liveries.

http://qwsim.flight1.net/forums/uploads/88/QW787_pax_data2.zip

Click on the link and update the pax data file. Work now with Qantas.

Edited by VBHB

Running i5-9600K @ 4.8ghz - 32GB DDR4 3200mhz - GTX 3070.

Hot fix that addresses this and some other issues just released.

Eric 

 

 

Just had a great flight LEBL-KEWR in the 787-10.  It’s a great addition and everything went perfectly in the flight, nice update!

Dave

Current System (Running at 4k): ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F, Ryzen 7800X3D, RTX 5090, 55" Samsung Q80T, 64GB DDR5 6000 RAM, EVGA CLC 280mm AIO Cooler, Brunner CLS-E NG Yoke, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS & Stick, Thrustmaster TCA Quadrant & Add-on, VirtualFly Ruddo+, TQ6+ and Yoko+, GoFlight MCP-PRO and EFIS, Skalarki FCU and MCDU

Figures. I've got so many end of season projects to do around the house it'll be a miracle if I can fly it before November. 😉 I've been looking forward to the -10 since I bought the plane. This is excellent.

 

Ryzen 7 7800X3D/B650 X AX | 5090 | 32gig | Win10 | Pimax Crystal Light

Installed 1.2.1 from Flight1... no -10 to be found anywhere -.-

It looks like this update requires a full reinstall.

Edited by Christopher Low

Christopher Low

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU / 64GB DDR5-6000 RAM / 12GB Nvidia RTX 4070 Super GPU / Gigabyte X870E Aorus Elite Wifi 7 / 1+2TB Samsung Evo Plus M2 Nvme

UK2000 Beta Tester

1.2.0 requires a full reinstall. Hotfix can be installed on top of it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.