Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, micstatic said:

Pfpx has a limited amount of airplanes it works with though right?  Simbrief and a quick and easy for most adding and also has built on compatibility with most addons 

PFPX only comes with a limited amount of aircraft templates by default, that's right.
However there are templates for many aircraft types available on the internet.

For example there was no A310 template in PFPX I needed for the iniBuilds A310 release but found one online ✔

I've never used the fuel tracking function in PFPX cause I have always been happy with the fuel predictions PFPX gave me.

Those using simbrief can track their calculated fuel and actual fuel consumption in MS Excel.

Not sure if you can set that fuel bias in Simbrief somewhere at the specific airframe settings..?

Posted
34 minutes ago, Car147 said:

Looking forward to replicating the holiday trips we made in 757's with Air200, Flying Colours, Airtours back in the late 90's early 2000.

Ah yes, flying colours! I was really hoping to get a job with them back in the 90’s  when they advertised for FOs on the 757…but didn’t.

Somewhere in my parents loft I think I have a file with a collection of rejection letters from a whole host of now defunct British airlines. British midland, Air uk , Airworld etc.

Kids today, straight onto an A320 or 737  out of flight school with 250 hours , and next thing they’ve got a YouTube channel to tell everyone about it.

Anyway, Sorry mustn’t grumble.

  • Like 6

787 captain.  

Previously 24 years on 747-400.Technical advisor on PMDG 747 legacy versions QOTS 1 , FS9 and Aerowinx PS1. 

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Konterhalbe said:

PFPX only comes with a limited amount of aircraft templates by default, that's right.
However there are templates for many aircraft types available on the internet.

For example there was no A310 template in PFPX I needed for the iniBuilds A310 release but found one online ✔

I've never used the fuel tracking function in PFPX cause I have always been happy with the fuel predictions PFPX gave me.

Those using simbrief can track their calculated fuel and actual fuel consumption in MS Excel.

Not sure if you can set that fuel bias in Simbrief somewhere at the specific airframe settings..?

I can see where PFPX is good.  But for most of the planes I fly simbrief is accurate enough.  Not to mention the native integration with the addon airplanes.  I'm personally not looking to get into all that.  

  • Like 1

5800X3D, Gigabyte X570S MB, 4090FE, 64GB DDR4 3600 CL16, EVO 970 M.2's, Alienware 3821DW  and 2  22" monitors,  Corsair RM1000x PSU,  360MM MSI MEG, MFG Crosswind, T16000M Stick, Boeing TCA Yoke/Throttle, Skalarki MCDU and FCU, Logitech Radio Panel/Switch Panel, Spad.Next

Posted

Quite happy to learn this news. My excitement was tempered by the ‘mid tier’ proposition. A properly done 757 is well overdue. We’ve had the PMDG band on repeat with the same 3 aircraft for over two decades so it’s time for a new Boeing tune that truly measures up. 

As much as I wholeheartedly agree that 99.9% of simmers will never use 99.9% of the failures in a study level aircraft, it’s nice to know that they are there. 

Mid tier aircraft are always underwhelming, as with the QW 787 or the Aerosoft efforts in recent times. The lack of systems fidelity usually extends to dumbed down automation modes and the resultant getting frustrated with things that the aircraft simply can’t do. 
 

Take your time guys, this one is worth the wait! 

  • Like 6
Posted

Does anyone know if the Bluebird 757 is planned to come with a Panel State save function?
This (alongside some other things) is a k.o.-criteria for me and the reason why I always went for PMDG airplanes in previous sims.

 

I'd rather get the 757 instead of PMDGs 777 because I can do transatlantic flights with both of them but only the 757 is small enough for some nice places to fly like LOWI Innsbruck, LGSK Skiathos, LGMK Mykonos, EGHI Southampton, ENML Molde, etc...

Posted

Wow great news to have much higher fidelity.  I think alot of developers can reflect on the sampling from the Navigraph survey, with many seeking high level systems simulation, accuracy and quality.   Its been a long long time since we had a very high level fidelity B757 in the simulation atmosphere in many years. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

CYVR LSZH 

http://f9ixu0-2.png
 

Posted

Well, I for one just see this as the usual feature creep that always seems to happen to delay things. "Ooo, let's do this!", "Ooo, let's put in that!" Then you end up with the 7 year CRJ...

 

 

(Dons asbestos suit and unpins fire extinguisher...)

Master Sergeant, U.S. Air Force, Retired

Former T-33A Crew Chief

Former B-1B Crew Chief / Flightline Maintenance Expediter

Former Learjet Corp. Quality Inspector

Formerly Young (😩)

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Konterhalbe said:

Does anyone know if the Bluebird 757 is planned to come with a Panel State save function?
This (alongside some other things) is a k.o.-criteria for me and the reason why I always went for PMDG airplanes in previous sims.

 

I'd rather get the 757 instead of PMDGs 777 because I can do transatlantic flights with both of them but only the 757 is small enough for some nice places to fly like LOWI Innsbruck, LGSK Skiathos, LGMK Mykonos, EGHI Southampton, ENML Molde, etc...

This is something we are working on but I can't comment too much more.

 

2 hours ago, b1bmsgt said:

Well, I for one just see this as the usual feature creep that always seems to happen to delay things. "Ooo, let's do this!", "Ooo, let's put in that!" Then you end up with the 7 year CRJ...

 

 

(Dons asbestos suit and unpins fire extinguisher...)

You shouldn't have to put on a flame suit just to express your opinion. I welcome the skepticism because it actually drives us.  But unless you actually know what goes into developing a high quality aircraft,  yes it does take a long time. We started this project from scratch and didn't have a previous model or a base of code to work from.  I will give a lot more info next month on what where the project is going but this not just some "feature creep" more of a feature overhaul. But for those that lose patience, this is not the project for them.  As I mentioned in my video we have an internal timeline ( and a bigger team now ) to work on the aircraft and get it completed.    

 

For everyone else,  thank you for the support.  This 757 will be worth the wait..... and the 767 too 🙂  

Edited by sherv_BBS
grammar
  • Like 9
Posted
6 minutes ago, sherv_BBS said:

This is something we are working on but I can't comment too much more.

 

You shouldn't have to put on a flame suit just to express your opinion. I welcome the skepticism because it actually drives us.  But unless you actually know what goes into developing a high quality aircraft,  yes it does take a long time. We started this project from scratch and didn't have a previous model or a base of code to work from.  I will give a lot more info next month on what where the project is going but this not just some "feature creep" more of a feature overhaul. But for those that lose patience, this is not the project for them.  As I mentioned in my video we have an internal timeline ( and a bigger team now ) to work on the aircraft and get it completed.    

 

For everyone else,  thank you for the support.  This 757 will be worth the wait..... and the 767 too 🙂  

Amazing work. People need to be patient it comes when you are happy with it, simple really. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, sherv_BBS said:

This is something we are working on but I can't comment too much more.

Made me smile 😉

I'm sure most simmers are happy to wait longer for an aircraft development if the outcome is of high quality.
 

Posted
On 12/22/2023 at 9:21 AM, threegreen said:

What's interesting though is that he says the aim for a mid-level aircraft is "out the window" and it's going to be a high fidelity aircraft for the hardcore simmers instead.

Yess!!!!!! Praise BlueBird!

Finally we have a second Fenix team but for Boeing 😍

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, sherv_BBS said:

This 757 will be worth the wait..... and the 767 too 🙂  

So are we all going to pretend like BlueBird didn't just confirm the 767 is next down the pipeline?

Can't wait! You guys are awesome!

Take-offs are optional, landings are mandatory.
The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.
To make a small fortune in aviation you must start with a large fortune.

There's nothing less important than the runway behind you and the altitude above you.
It's better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air, than in the air wishing you were on the ground.

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, WestAir said:

So are we all going to pretend like BlueBird didn't just confirm the 767 is next down the pipeline?

Can't wait! You guys are awesome!

Well as the flight decks and systems are very similar, if not virtually identical, it certainly makes sense.  It's a good move by them anyway as nobody else seems interested in making these excellent planes.
I have flown on both many times, and the 757 is still one of my favourites - basically a sports car of the airliner world.

Edited by bobcat999
  • Upvote 1

Rob (but call me Bob or Rob, I don't mind).

I like to trick airline passengers into thinking I have my own swimming pool in my back yard by painting a large blue rectangle on my patio.

Intel 14900K in a Z790 motherboard with water cooling, RTX 4080, 32 GB 6000 CL30 DDR5 RAM, W11 and MSFS on Samsung 980 Pro NVME SSD's.  Core Isolation Off, Game Mode Off.

Posted
40 minutes ago, JetCat said:

Finally we have a second Fenix team but for Boeing 😍

PMDG?

32 minutes ago, WestAir said:

So are we all going to pretend like BlueBird didn't just confirm the 767 is next down the pipeline?

They announced that a while ago actually.

16 minutes ago, bobcat999 said:

Well as the flight decks and systems are very similar, if not virtually identical, it certainly makes sense.

From what I know the systems are actually pretty different on the 757 and 767, at least much more different than what many think. The common type rating comes from the cockpit being virtually the same except for some things like fuel jettison capability and the operation of it being much the same. But under the hood the 757 and 767 are rather different.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...