9 hours ago, AnkH said:

Set what to boost? In NVCP?

Please read again what I wrote.

It begins "IN MSFS..."

Sorry if this has already been discussed, but there are tons of replies on the thread...Just wondering if anyone has found any benefit from using DX12 with LSFG?

Is anyone else having problems after upgrading to version 2.2?

I am seeing ghosts of the image of the plane and the lights of the runways with a double image, but it only happens with nighttime scenarios, with daylight at least they are not noticeable. I don't know if what I see as ghosts is what the forums call artifacts.

G-Sync is not working in version 2.2. At least not for me. On my OLED TV, I can bring up an overlay displaying VRR info. Using LS, refresh rate stays fixed at 100 Hz. As soon as I unscale, refresh rate changes with FPS. 

37 minutes ago, elee said:

Is anyone else having problems after upgrading to version 2.2?

I am seeing ghosts of the image of the plane and the lights of the runways with a double image, but it only happens with nighttime scenarios, with daylight at least they are not noticeable. I don't know if what I see as ghosts is what the forums call artifacts.

yeah, it's super annoying. just tried this out again in dx12...i'm blown away at the smoothness, but holy word not allowed, night time looks like a bad trip

 

P.S. if you want to revert, right click the title in your games menu, go to properties, select betas, and then go to 2.9 or another one. issue is gone in 2.1

Edited July 25, 20241 yr by V1ROTA7E

11 hours ago, Rocky_53 said:

Just wondering if anyone has found any benefit from using DX12 with LSFG?

Depends on what you are looking for. If you want to use it on top of classic frame generation on a RTX 4000 series card, DX12 is obviously a must. If not, it might be THE advantage of LS that it also works with DX11. But since Asobo fixed the most annoying drawback of DX12 (ground tile bleedthrough), I see no reason why to stick to DX11

2 hours ago, AnkH said:

Depends on what you are looking for. If you want to use it on top of classic frame generation on a RTX 4000 series card, DX12 is obviously a must. If not, it might be THE advantage of LS that it also works with DX11. But since Asobo fixed the most annoying drawback of DX12 (ground tile bleedthrough), I see no reason why to stick to DX11

Hmm, OK Chris, cheers. I guess I'll have to fire up the sim later today and check it out.

6 hours ago, AnkH said:

I see no reason why to stick to DX11

I thought the same thing till I went back to DX11 last night. Been using DX12 exclusively for the past 2 or so years. I’ve gotta say, DX11 feels so much more robust. It’s snappy, frame times are far more consistent as well. I hope LSFG can stabilize further, because DX11 with frame gen is the holy grail. 

32 minutes ago, V1ROTA7E said:

because DX11 with frame gen is the holy grail. 

No, a proper DX12 implementation is the holy grail. DX11 with frame generation via LSFG will always be kind of a workaround and will never reach the same quality that is possible with the dedicated solutions provided by nVIDIA and AMD. 

37 minutes ago, V1ROTA7E said:

I thought the same thing till I went back to DX11 last night. Been using DX12 exclusively for the past 2 or so years. I’ve gotta say, DX11 feels so much more robust. It’s snappy, frame times are far more consistent as well. I hope LSFG can stabilize further, because DX11 with frame gen is the holy grail. 

Like you, I haven't tried DX11 for several years. Pretty much since I got the 4090 oct '22. But I get excellent frame time consistency (as long as I don't run crazy high AI traffic) with DX12 and native frame gen. I've tried LS many times now, and never been completely happy with it. 

4 hours ago, V1ROTA7E said:

I thought the same thing till I went back to DX11 last night. Been using DX12 exclusively for the past 2 or so years. I’ve gotta say, DX11 feels so much more robust. It’s snappy, frame times are far more consistent as well. I hope LSFG can stabilize further, because DX11 with frame gen is the holy grail. 

I went back to DX11 because my 3080 12GB VRAM is completely saturated at many large airports. And you're right now that I think of it, it does seem to provide more consistent FT.

Can someone please tell me. What I am doing wrong? 

So I have the latest nvidia driver update. 

Msfs updated 

Inibuilds omdb latest update 

And the 777 300er latest update 

Latest bing maps fstl latest with settings low 

Lossless scale with auto fps 

Samsung g5 2k monitor 144hz

7950x3d 

3080ti

6000mhz ram 32gb

Dx11

Vsync in game 1/3 at 48fps

 

I am taxing around airport and smooth for a while at 48 then it's drops to 34 and fluctuating fps. 

With minor jitters. 

 

Any recommendations? 

 

Thanks

Mike 

2 hours ago, mikeymike said:

I am taxing around airport and smooth for a while at 48 then it's drops to 34 and fluctuating fps. 

I've tried iniBuilds OMDB with and without LS. Stutterfest. That was with relatively high traffic settings though. Seems to be a tricky airport in terms of performance. 

4 hours ago, Cpt_Piett said:

I've tried iniBuilds OMDB with and without LS. Stutterfest. That was with relatively high traffic settings though. Seems to be a tricky airport in terms of performance. 

Well to the bin it's tossed to then. 

Kind of pathetic with today's modern tech. 

And yet airports are not optimized. 

 

Mike 

7 hours ago, mikeymike said:

Can someone please tell me. What I am doing wrong? 

So I have the latest nvidia driver update. 

Msfs updated 

Inibuilds omdb latest update 

And the 777 300er latest update 

Latest bing maps fstl latest with settings low 

Lossless scale with auto fps 

Samsung g5 2k monitor 144hz

7950x3d 

3080ti

6000mhz ram 32gb

Dx11

Vsync in game 1/3 at 48fps

 

I am taxing around airport and smooth for a while at 48 then it's drops to 34 and fluctuating fps. 

With minor jitters. 

 

Any recommendations? 

 

Thanks

Mike 

Have you tried OMDB with LS but without auto fps? Set TLOD to various LODs in MSFS just as a test...maybe try 50, 100, 150, 200, 300 etc.