2 hours ago, Nuno Pinto said:

Exactly. That's exactly it.

People complained the A310 (A306?) was falling off the sky, everyone seemed to have issues with that - It never happened to me and i flew (still fly the A306) a LOT. Freezing screens on the A350-900-1000? Nope, sorry, and i fly them quite often and on very long legs.

Out of VRAM, i've said this enough: Stop using 8k textures (why even) and setting everything on ultra just because you think you can. Configure the simulator properly and you will never run into problems like these. People want it all: 4k, ultra, 5+ addons for just about anything and expect all to run in perfect sync. Spoiler alert: It won't happen.

 

You are required to monitor your flight at all times. If you think the real machine is "bug-free" or if any responsible pilot would trust the machine 100% you're in for a surprise. If it happens i will correct it, i don't care if it's a bug or not - I am monitoring it and if it misbehaves i will do my part as virtual pilot: Deal with it.

I never had high Vram or out of vram issues fling this plane. No freezing displays or OOM issues. I'm not trying to run everything in 4K and I keep my settings conservative for where I can run my system without performance problems. I probably put over 500 hours in the A350 and it performs very well for me. It looks like folks are spending thousands of dollars on GPU cards with the expectations of setting everything to ultra and getting disappointed when their new gear doesn't meet their expectations. Are there bugs with this airplane "YES". Do the bugs affect performance or stability of the aircraft "NO". Ini has released many updates to fix bugs and I'm grateful for their efforts. If I can fly the A350 with my system without a performance issues or crashes, then everyone with high end systems should be able, if not then there's a problem with your setup.

1 hour ago, Nuno Pinto said:

Fair enough. Not being an actual trained pilot, i would never be able to detect them. Well, none TOO obvious at least, so i made that statement. I really have no (detectable by me) issues.

I fully understand, and as a trained pilot, I am the first to admit that we make mistakes and learn with every flight. Anyone who says otherwise is not being truthful. 

I'm on a 7800x3d and a 4090 using 4k resolution, I do like this plane but it is the worse performing add-on I have.
Causes all sorts of panning stutters even if the FPS is fine.

I am going to play around with settings tonight, I uninstalled GSX and that made things a little better but IMHO the add-on needs serious optimization.

Not to mention if you start aligning the IRS and then use Shift+C to go outside the plane whenever you press Shift+C to go back into the plane the IRS align time will reset.

1 hour ago, BrianT said:

work, but i've found if I get the spinny thing when trying to purchase I log out of manager and back in again and it then works

Great tip, will give that a try on my next iniBuilds purchase.  I’ve been consumed with A2A Aerostar 600 lately and having a blast learning how it works.

I have no beef with iniBuilds, glad they’re an option.  I can understand other’s frustrations and also understand the revenue to cost process for modeling and software development after doing it for 40 years.

9 hours ago, Christopher Low said:

autogen houses in field short left of runway 25 threshold should be hay bales

Did a tour last night with 2020 and 2024 for EGGW will report back … I don’t recall any center line alignment issues, but will double check.

Really hope inibuilds can resolve some of these WASM crashes with the A350. Nothing worse than a 12 hour trip that ends in a WASM crash a few miles from the destination. It's enough to give you the Forest Whitaker eye...

 

23 minutes ago, Keirtt said:

It's enough to give you the Forest Whitaker eye...

1 hour ago, Bigmack said:

then everyone with high end systems should be able, if not then there's a problem with your setup.

Another one not getting it. So I help you out with it: my performance is fine with the A350. But it performs 20-30% lower than any other plane in my sim. So tell me why I should reduce the settings for this single bird? Why should I go around and lie about the performance? Why should I come here and lecture people about stupid subjective opinions like the «zero issues» bull? 

It is all about COMPARISON. Funny enough that the same honks claiming they have no issues because they anyway never completely use all functions (and thus unaffected by present system bugs) then use exactly this indepth simulation as reason why it is clear that performance is lower compared to other addons. Okay. So either you do NOT have performance issues or you do, but your subjective opinion is that it does not matter. But claiming you do NOT have performance issues and at the same time explaining that this performance drop (which didnt exists seconds before) is due to the complexity of the plane is just plain wrong. Stupid. Non consistent. 

On top of this: almost 100% of those claiming they do NOT have performance issues dont give numbers. If you ask, the get angry and put on the next fairytale like «I dont care about FPS as long as it is smooth» or comparable statements worth nothing. If you dig, you will then eventually find out that they are fine with 30FPS, even limited. And THOSE people then come here and lecture others about performance. Ridiculous.

/end of this rant.

27 minutes ago, AnkH said:

On top of this: almost 100% of those claiming they do NOT have performance issues dont give numbers.

Happy to be one of those that provided numbers, top of Page 2 of this thread. Those numbers were in 2020, in 2024 they are even better. What are your numbers?

5 hours ago, ha5mvo said:

Issue is not so much inibuilds per se.

Somehow the cheerleading squad had managed to convince everyone that they are some top tier developer. Actually the comparison to aerosoft is more fitting. 

Completely unqualified Twitch streamers, who have never , nor will ever work in aviation , or anything related to aviation, conning kids out of money.

Edited July 7, 2025Jul 7 by fluffyflops

12 minutes ago, SierraDelta said:

Happy to be one of those that provided numbers, top of Page 2 of this thread. Those numbers were in 2020, in 2024 they are even better. What are your numbers?

Not everyone is running high-end specs. It's easy to jump in and say you're getting great performance when you're on top-tier hardware—but for the rest of us, that's not very helpful. 

5 minutes ago, iFlySimX said:

Not everyone is running high-end specs. It's easy to jump in and say you're getting great performance when you're on top-tier hardware—but for the rest of us, that's not very helpful. 

You could also have a plane with square wheels and half an engine and people in this community will still support it 

@SierraDelta You did as one of the few, but you still miss one important piece of information. Are those 60-70FPS using frame generation? I guess so...  

I do get also around 70FPS (frame generation on) on IniBuilds EGLL using 75% AIG traffic at 4K resolution with adjusted settings (not everything on "ultra"), usually I can hold my 72FPS limit (some exceptions, as MKStudios LSZH, dont ask me why). But that is with my rig. And with using 4K textures only plus the optional "low res texture option" and "performance mode" turned on in the A350 EFB. Or your rig. Come on, I have a 9800X3D with a 4090, you even have a 5090 and a powerful i9. Saying that 60-70FPS is fine is just straight forward ridiculous, especially for those not having top tier hardware as we do. 

BTW: if I run my FPS unlimited, in the exact same scenario with the 777 from PMDG, I get close to 100FPS. And THAT is what buggers me out. Yes, the 350 is more modern than the 777 port, has higher resolved textures and a more detailed 3D model, but 30% off for this? Really?

2 hours ago, Keirtt said:

Really hope inibuilds can resolve some of these WASM crashes with the A350. Nothing worse than a 12 hour trip that ends in a WASM crash a few miles from the destination. It's enough to give you the Forest Whitaker eye...

 

Yes, that would upset me also. But I haven't experienced a WASM crash since the early release. But at every Ini update, I delete my wasm folder and allow another to be crated. Right now, I'm in the middle a flight From Cairo to JFK. I'm no frame rate junkie, but I did turn on my indicator while at HECA with AIG 70%, GSX and active sky and mt FPS was around 30 to 50 taxing from gate to rwy. climbing to cruise alt FPS around 50 to 80 in dense clouds. Crossing the Atlantic Ocean FPS over 100. when I arrive in NY I'll check again what frames are. After watching A330 driver setup his A350 FMS on YouTube, I setup and programmed mines the same way using a +1 offset tracking crossing the Atlantic track. The A350 has been flying flawlessly so far. May I also state that I'm using the latest SU3 beta

Edited July 7, 2025Jul 7 by Bigmack

Was thinking of buying ini builds egll.is it true there is a pause on landing as i have seen in a video.

Or this something else causing it 

Was thinking of buying ini builds egll.is it true there is a pause on landing as i have seen in a video.

Or this something else causing it