July 12, 2025Jul 12 My only "problem" so far has been the fact that the iFly 737 MAX appears to cause my FS 2024 not to start. If I uninstall and completely wipe any remnants of the iFly 737 MAX, after trying to start a session with that aircraft, FS 2024 enters the "dreadful" 97% loading never ends cycle on start 😕 I had been able to use it until the first 1.5.13.0 if my memmory doesn't fail. Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
July 12, 2025Jul 12 28 minutes ago, jcomm said: My only "problem" so far has been the fact that the iFly 737 MAX appears to cause my FS 2024 not to start. If I uninstall and completely wipe any remnants of the iFly 737 MAX, after trying to start a session with that aircraft, FS 2024 enters the "dreadful" 97% loading never ends cycle on start 😕 I had been able to use it until the first 1.5.13.0 if my memmory doesn't fail. I bought through marketplace, some scenery that I expected to work ok in 2024 since I was buying it from that platform. FSIMSTUDIO - CYYC works great in 2020 but is a stutter-fest in 2024. Does not Aboso check these things out in 2024 before taking our moneys? without a means for refund? i9-14900K, 64G DDR5, 24G VRAM RTX4090 Velocity One Yoke and Quadrant LG rudder pedals Bluetooth earbuds
July 12, 2025Jul 12 23 hours ago, Mace said: That usually means its close to release. Just a quick read through this forum would suggest that shouldn't be the case. Cheers Steve Hall
July 12, 2025Jul 12 1 hour ago, cowpatz said: Just a quick read through this forum would suggest that shouldn't be the case. Maybe so? (shrugs) Rhett 7800X3D ♣ 96 GB G.Skill Flare ♣ Gigabyte 4090 ♣ Crucial P5 Plus 2TB
July 13, 2025Jul 13 nothing really to add except that I just updated to 1.5.16 and all fine. so rather throwing in some positive feedback as forums are usually to vent and get help when needed. just started the fenix 320 at EGLL, now enroute to LGRP and all smooth. yes, there was some hickup during takeoff run but neglectable for me. lots of traffic, nice live weather with a level of haze/thin clouds I just passed through and still perfectly fine for me Phil Leaven i5 10600KF, 32 GB 3200 RAM, ASUS 4070 12GB EVO, Asus ROG Z490-H, 2 WD Black NVME for each Win11 (500GB) and MSFS (1TB), Rolling Cache 16GB, Photogrammetry always OFF, Live Weather and Live Traffic always ON, Res 2560x1440 on 27"
July 13, 2025Jul 13 14 hours ago, jcomm said: My only "problem" so far has been the fact that the iFly 737 MAX appears to cause my FS 2024 not to start. If I uninstall and completely wipe any remnants of the iFly 737 MAX, after trying to start a session with that aircraft, FS 2024 enters the "dreadful" 97% loading never ends cycle on start 😕 I had been able to use it until the first 1.5.13.0 if my memmory doesn't fail. This is no longer a problem! Today I loaded FS 2024, after reinstalling the iFly 737 MAX and pushing the latest update 1.0.4.2, and all was fine(*), flights started without quirks and actually had a really nice series of circuits around LPFR! 1.5.16.0 looks very smooth and clean! After a few sessions with BATC I am getting back to default ATC and AI Traffic. I leave BATC for a while now, and FSLTL is also installed, but I'm good even with the default AI models. Overall and for line flights, default ATC is rather acceptable. I'm glad I joined this Beta !!! 🤩 (*) But I had done the same yesterday and the day before and ir didn't work... Edited July 13, 2025Jul 13 by jcomm Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
July 13, 2025Jul 13 39 minutes ago, DAD said: just started the fenix 320 at EGLL, now enroute to LGRP and all smooth. yes, there was some hickup during takeoff run but neglectable for me. lots of traffic, nice live weather with a level of haze/thin clouds I just passed through and still perfectly fine for me your opinion will be interesting once you start your approach. Had a similar opinion when I first started .16, but at approach it was stutterfest again with no recovery. So, no fix at that end, at least not for me. Guenter Steiner -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Betatester for: A2A, LORBY, FSR-Pillow Tester --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 13, 2025Jul 13 Oh yeah, those famous friday builds...first simconnect, right now a also showstopping mainthread bug. I REALLY have to thank MS for lowering my energy bills significantly in 2025 - flightsim rig barely running these days 🙄 'It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.'
July 13, 2025Jul 13 1 hour ago, guenseli said: your opinion will be interesting once you start your approach. Had a similar opinion when I first started .16, but at approach it was stutterfest again with no recovery. So, no fix at that end, at least not for me. You are an adept user no doubt, but stutters at any point for me indicate a simple case of sim demands exceeding resource availability at the expected FPS cadence. Ie frame times suffer when your hardware can't keep up. I'm sure you've tested at multiple stepped down settings points to eliminate hardware limitations from stutter equations? 🤭 Kevin Firth - AMD 9800X3D; Asus Prime X670E; 64Gb Cas30 6000 DDR5; RTX5090; AutoFPS
July 13, 2025Jul 13 8 minutes ago, kevinfirth said: I'm sure you've tested at multiple stepped down settings points to eliminate hardware limitations from stutter equations? Yes, you can be sure! have a look here, what my problem is And I'm not alone according to official forums. my settings are somewhat low meanwhile ... with a 4080 super! (VFR with small GA planes is no problem. But anything bigger at a bigger airport and coming down from a higher altitude seems to make sth stuck in the sim . for my opinion) Guenter Steiner -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Betatester for: A2A, LORBY, FSR-Pillow Tester --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 13, 2025Jul 13 Dynamic Settings = ON eliminates all stuttering stuations for me even at the worst airport, KSFO. No downsides I can see at LOD 150. Also the low resource message goes away and runways arn't blurry on landing. dd
July 13, 2025Jul 13 5 hours ago, guenseli said: Yes, you can be sure! have a look here, what my problem is And I'm not alone according to official forums. my settings are somewhat low meanwhile ... with a 4080 super! (VFR with small GA planes is no problem. But anything bigger at a bigger airport and coming down from a higher altitude seems to make sth stuck in the sim . for my opinion) Are you using autofps app? Kevin Firth - AMD 9800X3D; Asus Prime X670E; 64Gb Cas30 6000 DDR5; RTX5090; AutoFPS
July 13, 2025Jul 13 7 hours ago, jcomm said: This is no longer a problem! Today I loaded FS 2024, after reinstalling the iFly 737 MAX and pushing the latest update 1.0.4.2, and all was fine(*), flights started without quirks and actually had a really nice series of circuits around LPFR! 1.5.16.0 looks very smooth and clean! After a few sessions with BATC I am getting back to default ATC and AI Traffic. I leave BATC for a while now, and FSLTL is also installed, but I'm good even with the default AI models. Overall and for line flights, default ATC is rather acceptable. I'm glad I joined this Beta !!! 🤩 (*) But I had done the same yesterday and the day before and ir didn't work... I’m interested in your decision to switch to default ATC from BATC? Whats behind that? And does default ATC still call for some unrealistic flight level changes?
July 13, 2025Jul 13 40 minutes ago, Virtual-Chris said: I’m interested in your decision to switch to default ATC from BATC? Whats behind that? And does default ATC still call for some unrealistic flight level changes? First because being on the beta branch I feel commited to testing as much aspects of the core sim as possible. The latest SU3 beta releases are solving problems I had reported like the wrong settings of the Cruise altitude from imported flightplans, but also better handling of SIDs and STARs. And at LPPT it doesn't tell me to bactrack on rw 20 for takeoff or taxi to gate like BATC does 😕 Edited July 13, 2025Jul 13 by jcomm Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
Create an account or sign in to comment