Has anyone experienced any issues while flying the ini A350? When I was parked at the gate, sometime later the screen went black, and the game said that I crashed.

SU5 is hard on everyone's system (well maybe not everyone) but the people I talk to often.

We need to get back performance on the Asobo side first.

I'm not surprised the scenery is demanding... but you add that on top of a payware aircraft, weather, AI traffic etc... and what do you expect?

OK i take back what I said.

Im getting a lot of studdering now and a worning im running out of VRAM? I have a 4090?

When I booted it up it seemed fine but now that Im coming from another airport the performance is pretty bad.

4090 has 32GB Vram, right?

I have both stuttering and Vram warnings. However, I must say that that on average CPU usage for my card (my sig) never exceeds 75-80%. Occasional, but frequent stutters that generate GPU spikes close to 100% in turn generate VRAM warnings. Hence, I guess it's a complex issues and perhaps even 5090 won't help, but I would be happy to read the reviews.

2 hours ago, Flic1 said:

I did have PSXT running

Just FYI - PSXT profile for new KATL isn't ready, Nico is on vacation until 06/08.

The apron lights seem very dim to me. Nothing like the preview pictures. One terminal is very bright but all of the others are very dark...

Getting VRAM warnings with GPUs that have 24GB+ VRAM is bizarre to me. I have 12GB, and only the most super dense scenery areas (with detailed payware airports and the PMDG 737/777) result in anything like that. I appreciate that I am not running really complex weather or animated AI planes, but I guess that 1920x1080 resolution on a 24" monitor has its benefits

Edited May 31May 31 by Christopher Low

3 hours ago, G-YMML1 said:

4090 has 32GB Vram, right?

24. 5090 has 32

4 hours ago, ryanbatc said:

SU5 is hard on everyone's system (well maybe not everyone) but the people I talk to often.

We need to get back performance on the Asobo side first.

I'm not surprised the scenery is demanding... but you add that on top of a payware aircraft, weather, AI traffic etc... and what do you expect?

The main issue I had was the VRAM on the 5090, but as long as I didn't look around too much, I was able to use the sim just fine with the pmdg 737 and ini A350

the fact that the developer has to give ideal settings, means it's too heavy. I skip. looks good but I want to land or taxi normally.

To be fair, those "ideal" settings for a "good PC" look pretty high. I am so tempted to buy this airport, if for no other reason than to see just how well it performs on my PC. I see others struggle at certain airports with systems that have at least twice as much VRAM as I have, and I suspect that it has more to do with photogrammetry than anything else. With PG disabled, I already have a significant saving on power requirements compared to (based on accurate statistical data ) 75% of the player base.

why would you want photogrammetry off, it's one off the key stones off msfs2024.

1 hour ago, pilotter said:

the fact that the developer has to give ideal settings, means it's too heavy. I skip. looks good but I want to land or taxi normally.

the fact the dev recommends that texture resolution is to be on ultra and then everyone is running out of vram is interesting.....

I bet its chock full of stuff in the terminal that the kids like which is hammering the performance. Never forget eye candy sells copies, good performance does not.

Edited Sunday at 08:07 AM5 days by fluffyflops

7 hours ago, ryanbatc said:

SU5 is hard on everyone's system (well maybe not everyone) but the people I talk to often.

We need to get back performance on the Asobo side first.

I'm not surprised the scenery is demanding... but you add that on top of a payware aircraft, weather, AI traffic etc... and what do you expect?

agreed. but again I stand by my point that more eye candy means more sales. its a 10 year old concept which the likes of inibuilds and now orbx have cashed in on. Its a different market now, (even if people back in the old days were locking at frames at 10 to get cool screenshots)

Edited Sunday at 08:20 AM5 days by fluffyflops

39 minutes ago, pilotter said:

why would you want photogrammetry off, it's one off the key stones off msfs2024.

Personally, I do not consider it to be one of the "keystones" of MSFS 2024. It has too many flaws. I much prefer the "clean" look of autogen only scenery. I get that some city skylines may not look as convincing with PG off, but frankly I have not experienced all that much of a problem in the locations where I fly. I have VFR Landmarks packages for London (which more than satisfies me), Dublin, Amsterdam, and Athens. However, I do not have any packages at all for cities like Brussels, Frankfurt, Dusseldorf, Copenhagen, Nice, Toulouse, Genoa, Zurich, Geneva, Manchester, Edinburgh, Glasgow.........the list goes on and on.......and not once have I looked down and thought "that is rubbish". At the height that I pass over them when on final approach, I am more than happy with how they look........and I am not the only person who thinks so.

With respect to Atlanta, has anyone here tested this with PG off? I would be interested to know if there are any serious problems. I have not visited a single payware airport to date that is unusable with PG off, although one or two have some minor issues.

Edited Sunday at 08:49 AM5 days by Christopher Low