Jump to content

NZ255

Members
  • Content Count

    610
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NZ255

  1. Right, but I haven’t looked for myself. I was more talking to the people saying there’s no water masking anymore.
  2. They do acknowledge here the water masking isn't good (nothing at all?) in the upper Caribbean. I assume there’s water masking in the lower parts?
  3. Why would WT be looking at the horizon discord? How is the horizon mod a problem for WT?
  4. Imagine if he got told you don’t move the throttles in normal operations haha
  5. Thanks for the tip, I didn’t know I could block you edit: actually I’m struggling to figure out how, would you mind posting instructions?
  6. It started as one, Satco. There was some disagreement, and they split. You can find details if you include “satco” in your Google searches.
  7. Can’t find any details about it other than this video. Not my cup of tea but interesting to see them make a stand-alone game.
  8. Yep that looks like a bug. Workaround would be to not fly in those conditions 😄 But hopefully the ground improvement fixes come one day.
  9. Soft body simulation, New propeller simulation. But looks like you answered it in the next post.
  10. It looks a little orange, I’m thinking it’s still default? If you enable the toggle feature in the ini file, then you can toggle it on/off live in sim with the insert key. Or Control+Insert if you’ve downloaded it recently.
  11. Nah, 3rd party devs won’t have to worry about stuff like that. That’s all on Asobo to currently interpret the polygons, materials and displays. Which already works in the DX12 beta. You may be thinking of when XPlane went from opengl to vulkin. That was because (as far as I recall) they allowed 3rd party devs to “draw” directly to the screen with opengl code. Not a problem for MSFS as devs never had that level of control.
  12. Interesting, the sdk mentions to design the texture so that it does not dazzle the pilot. https://docs.flightsimulator.com/html/mergedProjects/How_To_Make_An_Aircraft/Contents/Modelling/Airframe/Texturing/Propellers_And_Turbines.htm
  13. I interpret that smile as the “we’re working on that, you’re going to like this” smile. These days probably means it’s in 2024 🙂
  14. Spring until we start hearing more about MSFS 2024? I guess it was telling how Jorg talked about all the time and some rough dates to get Brazil TIN cities and it would be in for 2020. So maybe a mid 2024 launch? 2020 released in August, and it was first teased 14 months prior…
  15. Gosh some of those questions… and it’s frustrating when the same question gets asked multiple times, wasting the limited time.
  16. Something I’ve read but can’t confirm myself is that VRS is overdone in DCS and is quite hard to get in real life. I’d be interested to hear more about this though.
  17. But what’s the market size? It’s probably grown a lot since MSFS came around and it has 12 million users according to MS.
  18. Welcome, Almost a terabyte sounds like a bug. Like other suggested I’d delete and reinstall. If you’re interested, FS2024 the next version will be much smaller and lots of the content will stream from the cloud only when you need it. So the installed size will be a lot smaller.
  19. I’m hoping a streaming sim means if someone has a plane or helicopter you don’t have installed, you’ll see the correct version on your screen, rather than a TBM for example. If the marketplace supports freeware, and the moderation gets sorted we might see an end to flightsim.to You'll want everything from the marketplace because it’ll support features like above. Potentially free trials too! If it could work with vatsim clients too it could be the end of downloading huge AI models packs.
  20. MS uses the term “digital twin” a lot. This could have a load of uses outside of simulating vehicles. It could be a visualisation tool for anything in the real world.
  21. For the ATC people, they said “cognitive services … is going to gain importance in the next sim, you’ll see” That’s text to speech and natural speech mostly I believe
  22. That was FR24 wasn’t it, they seem to have a lot more data than FlightAware so I’d be happy about that. They also mentioned about liveries for AI which would mean correct models too.
×
×
  • Create New...