Flightbeam released KSFO Fs9

[Hoang 108]

In case you don't know yet, they have just released fs9 version of KSFO :( http://www.flightbeam.net/ksfofs9.htmlAnd the forum http://www.flightbeam.net/forums/viewforum.php?f=6 Has anyone tried it yet?

[cbrown 1]

They have. See thread http://forum.avsim.net/topic/350038-fsdt-klax-for-fs9-will-come/ from post 19 on.

[acmech 2]

Great news!!!!

[BillW 219]

Bought it today. Nothing short of being great. Its easy on the framerates.

[PittsS2B 33]

I bought it too, and am very impressed. Beautiful with no apparent framerate hit. A few flickering textures in isolated spots, but the overall product is otherwise excellent. Recommended!

[graemeb 15]

How does it compare to FlyTampa's KSFO?

[Nandan Patel 10]

How does it compare to FlyTampa's KSFO?

I would also like to know...

[Swoop 0]

+3 on would like to know...AND...It would be very nice if Mr. Flightbeam added some screen shots of the FS9 version so we can have a gander, that is, if I haven't missed them by some chance?Mark

[G-YMML1 605]

Am I correct that the scenery uses default runaways' textures? Thanks

[DieselTen 4]

Am I correct that the scenery uses default runaways' textures?

No way. To me they look like fully custom runway textures, look terrific!

[BillW 219]

I also had FlyTampa's KSFO. Flightbeam's is on another level. This is really a top-notch addon. The runway textures are definitely not default. Remember, you can download a trial version.

[acmech 2]

Flightbeam has taken ksfo to the next level .Great on frames and looks wonderful!

[altstiff 71]

Yup, double thumbs up from here!

[G-YMML1 605]

The exclude file is badly needed since any alteration with AFCAD opens the default building.

[John Hinson 24]

The exclude file is badly needed since any alteration with AFCAD opens the default building.

Hate to sound a cynic, but if you modify a working product you do so at your own risk. Using a dead and outdated product to do so is suicidal. Asking a developer to produce their product using outdated methods is unreasonable. Use AFX or ADE to do so and I can say with near-certainty that you will not have an issue, but doing so is still at your own risk. John