What I would love to see, is rare and small variations in knobs settings after loading a panel - simulating previous crews using the airplane. Doing all preflight checks of panel state makes sense in RL, because previous crew/maintenance might had left something in a non-standard setting. And I don't mean putting all switches randomly out of order. Rather having a chance of say 20% that maybe one thing will be set improperly, and even much lower if it is something important and easy to spot. In terms of how things are usually set it makes no big difference, but in terms of expectations a huge difference - you just cannot be _sure_ that when you enter the plane, everything will exactly be as always.Like with failures - having even 1 random failure per 10 hrs makes me montor things much more closely, because something _may_ break, even if chances for that are low.Otherwise I just remember what knobs are set to, I can be 100% sure, so there is no need to do the preflight checks. I already posted this idea in the support system, and Ryan answered they are too busy with more important things. Well, but since this is a wish-list. ;-)

I use track Ir and Ezca and sometime the seat give me some problem as can't interact with the glareshield, check box on the FMC to disable the seat or an animation would be nice.

Then you haven´t set EZdok or trackIR right. There should be no such problemif you set up your profiles in a right way./ Leffe

What I would love to see, is rare and small variations in knobs settings after loading a panel - simulating previous crews using the airplane. Doing all preflight checks of panel state makes sense in RL, because previous crew/maintenance might had left something in a non-standard setting. And I don't mean putting all switches randomly out of order. Rather having a chance of say 20% that maybe one thing will be set improperly, and even much lower if it is something important and easy to spot. In terms of how things are usually set it makes no big difference, but in terms of expectations a huge difference - you just cannot be _sure_ that when you enter the plane, everything will exactly be as always.Like with failures - having even 1 random failure per 10 hrs makes me montor things much more closely, because something _may_ break, even if chances for that are low.Otherwise I just remember what knobs are set to, I can be 100% sure, so there is no need to do the preflight checks. I already posted this idea in the support system, and Ryan answered they are too busy with more important things. Well, but since this is a wish-list. ;-)

That would be a great feature and easy to implement, I always end up skimming the checklists because I always know that the switches will be in the same position every flight.

An sdk

An sdk

Here's my +1. Can't wait to get FS2Crew and FSFlightKeeper working with this thing. At that point, I can essentially remove all other aircraft from my hard drive. Eric

Thanks all for your input guys lets hope PMDG can start using this to see where they can go better with their already perfect aircraft .

Better pushback

Pushback is currently an FSX routine. It would be good if PMDG could "take control" of pushback.

I think the only thing I would request would be something everyone would think is mundane. In the livery download section, have little thumbnails that we can enlarge and look at first before downloading...

Yep, absolutely. FMC to calculate the lower VREF associated with the short field package as well.

I would like to someday share the cockpit with another simmer in Multicrew. JB

+1

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/351513-pax-in-the-ngx/

I think the only thing I would request would be something everyone would think is mundane. In the livery download section, have little thumbnails that we can enlarge and look at first before downloading...

http://simtexture.de...d=PMDG%20737NGX

Pushback is currently an FSX routine. It would be good if PMDG could "take control" of pushback.

What specifically would you like added/changed?

What specifically would you like added/changed?

I believe the turning radius is way too wide.. At crowded airports it's impossible to push back past other parked aircraft and turn a tight 90 degress and be correctly lined up ready to taxi. Instead it takes a wide turn. I hope I'm being clear here?

What specifically would you like added/changed?

Also, same as above, but the option to be able to recognize the taxi lines, and to be able to stay on them while in push back would make things a lot smoother. Not sure though if this is possible with aircraft addon software, but the airport services mod has that ability, and wondering if it is even possible for PMDG to make it so.

+1 for the SDK! I'm not enjoying some airports approaches without a FO!