Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The AVSIM Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Release Dates Gone Wild - PFPX

Featured Replies

If the developer gives a release date they get hammered for a date, if they give a date and miss, they get hammered for being late.

 

you forgot developer meets release date and product doesn't meet expectations they get hammered. we gotta remember a lot of developers aren't full time and do this on the side and that it's a hobby based on a community.

  • Replies 207
  • Views 27.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If the developer gives a release date they get hammered for a date, if they give a date and miss, they get hammered for being late.

 

Fair enough, but for me (at least) that's kind of beside the point. I honestly don't care that they're not meeting their promised release schedule. I'm concerned that based on how they seem to be approaching this project they will simply never release it, because rather than picking a point to call it feature complete and fixing any bugs they find, they keep adding new things. That's potentially a never-ending process, and sadly it increasingly appears that it really is turning into just that for PFPX.

 

I can see how they fell into this trap, because they're perfectionists and it's a complex piece of software, but they really need to break out of it.

 

James

you forgot developer meets release date and product doesn't meet expectations they get hammered. we gotta remember a lot of developers aren't full time and do this on the side and that it's a hobby based on a community.

 

Good point.

Mark   CYYZ      

 

Not a matter of being stressed or angry. The point is when you have serious simulation aircraft like PMDG, or even similar aircraft, you like to do things properly. Most of us are after "as real as it gets" scenario. And this means proper flight planning.

...

Airline pilots doesn't do flightplanning like that. Their dispatch office does. The pilots simply verify the data they get from dispatch. So doing it yourself is not "as real as it gets" (god, I hate that term, so lame lol)

vatsim s3

1133704.png

 

 

Airline pilots doesn't do flightplanning like that. Their dispatch office does. The pilots simply verify the data they get from dispatch. So doing it yourself is not "as real as it gets" (god, I hate that term, so lame lol)

 

LOL. Thanks. I'm not 12. I did work on the ramp for years and saw the paperwork firsthand. I don't know about you but I'm the only one around here doing my flying, my ATC, my ramp loading, my maintenance, and fuel loading.

The flight planning from PFPX is as close to reality as we will see so doing it that way is real. Sorry if I didn't clarify. I am the dispatch office just as you are. Unless you have staff do it for you.

CYVR LSZH 

I7-14700k 64gb 6000Mhz DDR5 ASUS  z690 ROG STRIX Gaming  RTX 4080 Super, 

Not a matter of being stressed or angry. The point is when you have serious simulation aircraft like PMDG, or even similar aircraft, you like to do things properly. Most of us are after "as real as it gets" scenario. And this means proper flight planning.

...

Airline pilots doesn't do flightplanning like that. Their dispatch office does. The pilots simply verify the data they get from dispatch. So doing it yourself is not "as real as it gets" (god, I hate that term, so lame lol)

They also have 2 (or more) pilots on the flightdeck. "As real as it gets" means "as real as it can be on a home computer using game controllers, a keyboard, and a mouse."

Try not being so condescending.

 

Written by me using my Galaxy and Tapatalk 2

 

 

Matt L.

"The product will be released shortly."

 

Jeez not again...

 

Lol

 

Under the 50 EUR mark seems quite reasonable for a tool that will essentially compress almost every aspect of flight planning into one neat tool.

 

 


Under the 50 EUR mark seems quite reasonable for a tool that will essentially compress almost every aspect of flight planning into one neat tool.

 

+1

 

And Aerosoft backing should help the process of pushing this through hopefully. 

CYVR LSZH 

I7-14700k 64gb 6000Mhz DDR5 ASUS  z690 ROG STRIX Gaming  RTX 4080 Super, 

  • 1 month later...

From the PFPX forum: "Beta test released 9.9.7b today."

 

Oh brother, here they go again.

 

I have a feeling 0.9.9.9.1 is right around the corner. For FlightSimSoft, of course, "right around the corner" means sometime before the end of the Cenozoic Era.

I bought a licence for TOPCAT years ago, used it but soon came to the conclusion that the developer had made no effort to provide much needed

config files for the many new aircraft and variants that were appearing in FS9 and FSX. Even some of the config files that came with the program

were not very accurate. When I asked why some of these configs were not being created the reply was that these config files were difficult and that

they didn't possess the required data. Must admit I was disappointed by their reply and slowly but surely found other ways of calculating weight

and balance for various aircraft. I could see they had no interest in keeping TOPCAT updated and in reality it has been dead for some time.

When they announced PFPX I had to laugh..... So now they were promising a much more advanced piece of software but couldn't/didn't update config files

in TOPCAT for years. Shows you how much they cared about their existing customers. Don't hold your breath and be prepared to be disappointed.

Joaquin Blanco

Intel Core i9-9900K at 5Ghz, Corsair Hydro H100i RGB PLATINUM CPU cooler, Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E,Motherboard, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super 8GB GDDR6, G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32GB DDR4 3200MHz Memory, 500GB Samsung 970 EVO PLUS M.2 PCIe,2TB Samsung 860 QVO Solid State Drive, 2TB, 2 x Samsung 860 Evo 2TB, 1 x 1TB Samsung 860 Evo, Corsair RM650x 80 PLUS Gold 650W PSU.

 

 

 

If the developers of PFPX are indeed professional airline pilots, then the OCD of perfection is engrained in their blood. 

 

In the developers world, this need for perfection, as Ryan said, can translate into "feature creep" and "1% to go forever". 

 

In the world of professional airline pilots, the OCD of perfection translates into fewer dead people.

 

As for TOPCAT, I believe they soon realized they were not going to be able to supply the cfg files for many of the popular aircraft, and simply abandoned the project, instead of attempting to supply less than perfect information.  Not the best plan for those of us who shelled out the cash for the product.

 

When this product is released, I believe I'll wait a good while to purchase, only after seeing many reviews and letting time dampen the hype.

Dennis Trawick

 

Screen Shot Forum Rules

 

AVSIMSignature_zpsed110b13.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.