Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
styckx

Terrain and Objects LOD 200 vs 900

Recommended Posts

This induces stuttering as its is heavily CPU bound, and no modern day CPU can cope with it properly in dense areas. That was my findings any way and of course that is my opinion.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/31/2020 at 5:06 PM, Kilo60 said:

I still can't see much of a difference...

 

Guess I'm expecting the clarity to get better at distance which doesn't appear to change much at all.

You have to literally be blind to not see it.....holy cow lol

  • Like 2

FAA: ATP-ME

Matt kubanda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/31/2020 at 5:25 PM, Nate1 said:

For me the realistic setting is what I can see with my own eyes in real life. And I definitely can't see objects many many miles away with any clarity. In fact I often find simulation more convincing when the blur reflects realistic eyesight. Maybe someone has vision as sharp as the screenshots above?

On a related note - I'd quite like to see heat haze (i.e. the TBM exhaust effect applied to landscape). Could be amazing - particularly at night when one gets that twinkling effect.

 

Edit - I appreciate that the blending at the LOD border is not perfect at the moment & perhaps this is the more significant factor?

Nate

I love these comments. “I can’t see objects with clarity in real life...”

the difference between real life and the sim is that in real life, they are actually there. In the sim, they are not. In real life, you can still see objects in the distance you just can’t make out minute details. I’m sure the sim could do this too but it’s still probably too CPI intensive to have oblong objects be drawn.

  • Like 2

FAA: ATP-ME

Matt kubanda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those blind folks not seeing it: simply add a layer of snow, 50cm is enough, and you will instantly see the difference, especially in regions with hills and mountains. 

Only question for me: does this also affect draw distance of trees?


Greetings, Chris

Intel i5-13600K, 2x16GB 3200MHz CL14 RAM, MSI RTX 4080 Gaming X, Windows 11 Home, MSFS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, AnkH said:

Those blind folks not seeing it: simply add a layer of snow, 50cm is enough, and you will instantly see the difference, especially in regions with hills and mountains. 

Only question for me: does this also affect draw distance of trees?

Trees have their own LOD setting, keep them on Ultra to get the largest draw distance.

 

Well guys I am shooting super smooth approaches at LAX with LOD at "80", and I don't think I need more...

Microsoft%20Flight%20Simulator%20Screens

  • Like 1

-

Belligerent X-Plane 12 enthusiast on Apple M1 Max 64GB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Colonel X said:

Trees have their own LOD setting, keep them on Ultra to get the largest draw distance.

So just to clarify, are you saying that Terrain LOD and Objects LOD have no effect on how far trees are drawn?


spacer.png

REX AccuSeason Developer

REX Simulations

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Colonel X said:

 

What's up with your screenshots? Why are they so smeared outside of center point? I feel like looking at some terrible 3D image without 3D glasses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, MikeT707 said:

So just to clarify, are you saying that Terrain LOD and Objects LOD have no effect on how far trees are drawn?

Terrain LOD has some impact, but the major factor with tree draw distance is the Tree Quality setting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bummer, because the low draw distance of the trees is what bothers me most. This is just ridiculously short even with the setting on 200...


Greetings, Chris

Intel i5-13600K, 2x16GB 3200MHz CL14 RAM, MSI RTX 4080 Gaming X, Windows 11 Home, MSFS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Evros said:

What's up with your screenshots? Why are they so smeared outside of center point? I feel like looking at some terrible 3D image without 3D glasses.

All the filters he users.


David Murden  MSFS   Fenix A320  PMDG 737 • MG Honda Jet • 414 / TDS 750Xi •  FS-ATC Chatter • FlyingIron Spitfire & ME109G • MG Honda Jet 

 Fenix A320 Walkthrough PDF   Flightsim.to •

DCS  A10c II  F-16c  F/A-18c • F-14 • (Others in hanger) • Supercarrier  Terrains = • Nevada NTTR  Persian Gulf  Syria • Marianas • 

• 10900K@4.9 All Cores HT ON   32GB DDR4  3200MHz RTX 3080  • TM Warthog HOTAS • TM TPR • Corsair Virtuoso XT with Dolby Atmos®  Samsung G7 32" 1440p 240Hz • TrackIR 5 & ProClip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually never understood why they never implemented a logic like how Just Cause 2 renders Lods.

 

In Just Cause 2 if you go higher you see the rainforest lose detail, but the general color doesnt change.

 

While in every flightsim if there are no buildings/trees you see the ground texture which has a completely different average color.

If that base color would be gray (like in the case of the city skyline like the pictures from TS), pop-in would be way less disturbing, and you could leave the performance penalty to a minimum.

Also generic darkening of the base/ground texture would make bunches of trees look much more like a forest, since most of the time on the forest floor there are more smaller plants to diffuse the light and therefore generate near perfectly diffuse ambient occlusion (requiring 0 calculation penalty since its not directional ambient occlusion), shading/coloring that could be baked/generated with the planted tree-textures before they get "planted".

 

btw anyone know how you`d increase the precision of the terrain tesselation ?

Sadly enough the function that seems like it can do that (VectorDataTessellation) cannot be set higher than 3.

Edited by StoreyedTrain
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Evros said:

What's up with your screenshots? Why are they so smeared outside of center point? I feel like looking at some terrible 3D image without 3D glasses.

The Colonel is experimenting with the native Nvidia Experience shaders and filters - very cinematic!

PS.  I am using LODs of 3.0 in the user config file (Would be 300 on the slider).  Seems to be better in the distance without any noticeable performance loss or extra loading time. (1080Ti at 1440).

Edited by bobcat999
  • Like 3

Call me Bob or Rob, I don't mind, but I prefer Rob.

I like to trick airline passengers into thinking I have my own swimming pool in my back yard by painting a large blue rectangle on my patio.

Intel 14900K in a Z790 motherboard with water cooling, RTX 4080, 32 GB 6000 CL30 DDR5 RAM, W11 and MSFS on Samsung 980 Pro NVME SSD's.  Core Isolation Off, Game Mode Off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/1/2020 at 12:22 AM, styckx said:

I saw a topic earlier in the week which I can't find and it really didn't sell me too much on the differences so I figured I'd finally get around to playing around with this..

Warnings:

This will use more VRAM

This will use more RAM

This will will use more CPU

 This will increase load times

This will decrease FPS 

In UserCfg you can set the LOD above 200 here

 

Simply increase each value by a factor of one to increase above 200..

ie: 2.00000 = 200  / 9.00000 = 900 (I've seen no difference between 900 and 20000.. Yes I've tested that far.. It's up to you to find a happy medium based on your hardware)

Here is the max in game default LoDFactor (for both) 2.00000 (200)

Here is the increased LoDFactor (for both) of 9.00000 (900)

 

Have you noticed that with LOD 900 close objects popped OUT? The parking on the lower right side of the 900 LOD screenshot is empty.


7800X3D | 32 GB DDR5-6000 | RTX 3090 | Acer Predator X34P GSync | Tobii Eye Tracker 5 | Completed all achievements 😛 https://i.postimg.cc/DyjR8mzG/image.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, AnkH said:

Bummer, because the low draw distance of the trees is what bothers me most. This is just ridiculously short even with the setting on 200..

Due to the age of my rig I'm running the sim mostly on Med-High settings, but I've set my Tree Quality to Ultra and my Terrain LOD to 200, and I have to say it looks pretty nice. Trees blend into the distance and there is no popping. Mind you I'm running a 1080 display. 4K might be more of an issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...