Just now, Nyxx said:

I asked you a question so answer the question it was about you saying some have a special beta you seem to have forgot the point of my question completely. 

Dead simple.  Some Devs are not able to produce add-ons because the current publicly available SDK simply isn't complete.  Others apparently are able to produce quite complex products.  While I'm sure there is some resistance to changing methods in some places, the more reasonable assumption across the board is that that are not operating on a level basis.  That's not doing MSFS down, just drawing a conclusion from what I see and know.  If I said it's a pile of pants, then your point would be fair criticism, but I haven't, the furthest I've gone is to say is doesn't fulfill my needs personally...yet. 

1 minute ago, Nyxx said:

You simply have come here like others with not interested in MSFS as you fly P3D your just here to talk BS.

LOL...

I test product for MSFS that are even not released yet.....so....I am VERY aware of what I am writing. 

I beta test P3D and know the issues and chances there as well

I own both and test both.....watch what you are writing. You are below the line. 

 

1 minute ago, Nyxx said:

You simply have come here like others with not interested in MSFS as you fly P3D your just here to talk BS.

Untrue again, I'm here to follow a positive development that PMDG seem to be close to releasing a product we can all agree we'd like to see sooner than later!  Can I not do that whilst also using P3D? Everything in life doesn't have to be a binary choice...

1 minute ago, Nyxx said:

You simply have come here like others with not interested in MSFS as you fly P3D your just here to talk BS.

Please watch your attitude as you have the habit of attacking people if they post something you do not like and sometimes it looks you can’t stop.

This is a hobby...  🤓

2 minutes ago, mpo910 said:

MSFS have clearly communicated there is a beta SDK and limited devs at 300 who are testing this. It's no secret at all. And those 300 devs are mostly planecreators and dlc developers. 

This is a fact.....and no assumption. I have this from 1. hand....and those people I talk to would love to earn money with MSFS.....but they can't at the moment because the SDK is not offering what they need. And those people are not exceptions. 

And this can be true, whilst at the same time agreeing MSFS has some really good aspects but doesn't currently meet everyone's needs 🙂

Nvm

Edited May 23, 20215 yr by Nyxx

2 minutes ago, GSalden said:

Please watch your attitude as you have the habit of attacking people if they post something you do not like and sometimes it looks you can’t stop.

This is a hobby...  🤓

Am asking someone to do just as they asked another user to do, sorry your not following along.🙂
Btw look at the P3D forum and locked topic and then read this one. 

Edited May 23, 20215 yr by Nyxx

2 minutes ago, mpo910 said:

MSFS have clearly communicated there is a beta SDK and limited devs at 300 who are testing this. It's no secret at all. And those 300 devs are mostly planecreators and dlc developers. 

This is a fact.....and no assumption. I have this from 1. hand....and those people I talk to would love to earn money with MSFS.....but they can't at the moment because the SDK is not offering what they need. And those people are not exceptions. 

Wrong, you'r refering to the preview of Sim and World updates that has indeed 300 "previewers" that were picked randomly, devs or not. (also, im not even sure MSFS has a pool; of 300 devs right now)

2 minutes ago, kevinfirth said:

Dead simple.  Some Devs are not able to produce add-ons because the current publicly available SDK simply isn't complete.  Others apparently are able to produce quite complex products.  While I'm sure there is some resistance to changing methods in some places, the more reasonable assumption across the board is that that are not operating on a level basis.  That's not doing MSFS down, just drawing a conclusion from what I see and know.  If I said it's a pile of pants, then your point would be fair criticism, but I haven't, the furthest I've gone is to say is doesn't fulfill my needs personally...yet. 

And also wrong 😄 We all have the same SDK, some just have special access and contact with Asobo devs themselves. But all have the same tools, making stuff work for some and not others would just not...work at all.

1 minute ago, Nyxx said:

So why are you here? And why can it not brothers are better at working with what they’re is than others and you have not done what you ask the guy to do, that was evidence your word not mine so again point at it not you thoughts. Do as you ask him to do.

Reading about PMDG and Their approach and hoping they will deliver asap....but my hope is not that big unfortunately. 

Are you allowing me being here? Do I need your permission? Do I need to explain you why I am here. 

Come on....but if it satisfied you

2 minutes ago, Nyxx said:

Am asking someone to do just as they asked another user to do, sorry your not following along.🙂

Let’s move on and see what PMDG will bring ...

 

Edited May 23, 20215 yr by GSalden

1 minute ago, leprechaunlive said:

rong, you'r refering to the preview of Sim and World updates that has indeed 300 "previewers" that were picked randomly, devs or not. (also, im not even sure MSFS has a pool; of 300 devs right now)

No...I do Not. I talk about a BETA SDK. 

11 minutes ago, Chock said:

You do get a bit more these days on occasion. I suspect it might be something to do with the wind turbines across the estuary churning up the heat coming off the Stanlow Refinery.

It's possible things have changed in 15 years 🙂 also that my recollection is flawed, as I was concentrating so hard on greasing the landing...   Although my first solo I recall I nearly word not allowed myself as I didn't lock the canopy properly, and it came open as I turned downwind, so my attention was staying airborne not analysing the minutia of turbulence....  Only made that mistake once!

2 minutes ago, leprechaunlive said:

We all have the same SDK

Let's just agree that we draw differing conclusions from the evidence available, but civilly 🙂

28 minutes ago, mpo910 said:

Point me to the sentences about conspiracy theory ?

I'm not against or pro any sim. I want complex Airliners like 777 or 787, 747 A320 or 350 in the sim..the sim who offers me this...and give me decent immersion and stable platform is the one or are the ones I use. 

So why you are talking about conspiracy theories is not clear to me.

Marcus

The conspiracy theories about pmdg lying about the sdk and why they are releasing the dc6 before the more popular 737, and how it's a quick cash grab. I find it funny that people are saying these companies are trying to do a cash grab like they are not supposed to make any money and they should just work for free. 

Can someone please confirm that it is OK for me to be posting on the AVSIM forums at all at the moment? I am taking a break from flight simulation, and I am worried that commenting about anything with wings whilst I am driving supercars in Assetto Corsa could get me into a lot of trouble. I am steering well clear of the racing pigeon forums for the same reason.