March 10, 20233 yr Need some help and suggestions about buying an airbus, possibly a Fenix. Currently very pleased with the PMDG Boeing 737-600, 800, 900. I also have fly the Maddog MD-80, very upset with the sound, so thats basically in my hanger all the time. In the FSX days, had the entire line of the Aerosoft Airbus, and was pleased. Thus, I have been reading and hearing very much about the Fenix. My main concern is about the performance, and stutters. I fly most of the time into major airports,from developers like, FS DreamTeam, Flytampa, Flightbeam Concluding with my specs, 10700kf, 4.8ghz, 32 gb's 3080 Niviidia, could I have a nice smooth flight with the Fenix ? By the way my specs in the sim are on high and ultra high, TLOD 150 10700kf, 3080 nividia, 32gbs 3400mhz, 1,000 watts power, M.2 DVMe !tb, boot, 1tb 7200rpm, storage, windows 10 home
March 10, 20233 yr if you got no issues using pmdg or the maddog in msfs you will have no issues using the fenix at all I7-8700k,Corsair h1101 cooler ,Asus Strix Gaming Intel Z370 S11 motherboard, Corsair 32gb ramDD4,, gtx 1080ti Card, RM850 power supply Peter kelberg
March 10, 20233 yr You're sort of in the same Spec zone as me in terms of PC and I have no issues with the Fenix. Early on I did, and I abandoned it for a while, but as time went on and I tuned in the settings it's running nicely now. PMDG performs even better but that's always been the case for that product. The Fly-by-Wire is an excellent freeware airbus choice though. It's very difficult to tell them apart now. FBW has a better EFB tablet imo.. Edited March 10, 20233 yr by flyhalf Regards, Max (YSSY) i7-12700K | Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB 3600MHz DDR4 | Gigabyte RTX4090 24Gb | Gigabyte Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4 | Corsair HX1200 PSU
March 11, 20233 yr With your system and settings, there should be no issues with the Fenix, even if you are running in 4K.
March 11, 20233 yr I'd recommend you try out the FBW A32NX first - as @flyhalf said, it is very close in terms of features (and in some areas surpasses the Fenix in my opinion. And as it's free, it would seem worth trying it out before spending money on a similar model. Re: performance with the Fenix. It operates like no other plane in MSFS, in that the core of the systems are provided by an external app that runs in the background, external to MSFS. The app also runs the aircraft's displays. It is this architecture which can cause performance problems. I'm sure you would run it fine but my experience was one of decent FPS but awful stuttering. I bought it on the day of release and it's now permanently retired. The FBW model is now so good that I'm no longer driven to put up with the unenjoyable performance with the Fenix, when I get super, smooth performance with the FBW. Here is the link to the FBW if you wish to try it:- https://flybywiresim.com/ Bill 😎FS2024 • Currently in 'GA mode' : A2A Comanche 2024 & Aerostar • Black Square C208, Bonanzas, Barons, TBM850, Dukes • COWS DA40 & DA42 • FSW Legacy, C24R Sierra & C414 • Echo Falco F8L • FFX HJET, Visionjet and P180 2024 • Got Friends A32 Vixxen • FSReborn Sirius TL3000, Sting S4 and Piper M500 • Flyboy Rans S6S • Skyward DA50RG • SWS Zenith CH701, RV-8, RV-10, RV-14, PC12 • Milviz C310R • Air Foil Labs Bristell B23 TrackIR • BeyondATC • PMS GTN Payware • RealTurb • Axis & Ohs • FS Realistic Pro9800X3D • RTX 3080 • 64GB DDR5-6000NPPL licence holder in the UK
March 11, 20233 yr Also, download the poorly-named experimental version. It's the version with all the VNAV stuff. The stable version is a very old build. Another vote for the FBW.
March 11, 20233 yr Fenix all the way if you want the most serious A320 on MSFS as of date. Performance issues is overly exaggerated here. For me its on par with the MD82 by Leonardo and only 5 fps behind the PMDG 736 with fully moldeled systems. But that is just my experience. Edited March 11, 20233 yr by jbdbow1970
March 11, 20233 yr Author Wow, mixed views, it scares me since the developer is very new, and performance, I here a bit about stutters, I made one mistake already with the Maddog, cause of sounds I appreciate u folks giving ur opinions, going to wait a couple of days maybe and think it over, its really TEMPTING!!! I luv the PMDG 737, get about 30+ frames at KLAX/Inibuilds, developer. 10700kf, 3080 nividia, 32gbs 3400mhz, 1,000 watts power, M.2 DVMe !tb, boot, 1tb 7200rpm, storage, windows 10 home
March 11, 20233 yr I have exactly the same spec as you do and must say that I leave the Fenix in the hanger most of the time because of the poor performance compared to any other aircraft, especially around larger airports by the developers you mentioned (the PMDG 737 works flawlessly and stutter-free for me by comparison). A big Fenix update is coming with rumoured performance improvements, so it might be better to wait for that? (Though I’ve no idea when it will come)
March 11, 20233 yr Get the Fenix. I bought the 738 with my free credit and the plane is very boring compared to the Fenix. The Fenix is on a whole different level. Edited March 11, 20233 yr by MikeH99
March 11, 20233 yr Another vote for the Fenix. Even on my aged hardware, it runs stutter free. I must add I don't use 4K, nor do I push all the sim's setting to ultimate. AMD 7 7700X, 32GB DDR5, RTX 5060ti 16GB, 2 x Samsung 1TB NVMe, 1 x 4TB sata SSD, Windows 11 Prof
March 11, 20233 yr I’ve not flown the Fenix for a while and haven’t touched FBW since Fenix launched - Are they really that close now? Any news from Fenix on when the update will land? Sounds like it’s needed to put some distance between them and FBW.
March 11, 20233 yr Performance issues of the Fenix are exaggerated, I have much worse hardware than you and it runs fine. Make sure to download 4k liveries and not 8k liveries just to be safe (this is an option in their livery manager). Edited March 11, 20233 yr by Johnny Wyatt
March 11, 20233 yr Fenix all the way... AMD Ryzen 7 5800x3d, MSI X570 Pro, 32 gb DDR4 3600 ram, Gigabyte 6800 16gb GPU, 1x 2tb Samsung NvMe , 1x 2tb Sabrent NvME, 1x Crucial 4tb Nvme M2 Drive
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.