3 hours ago, FSHud said:

That will be a next step - to take NavData directly from MSFS or alternative data sources by avoid continuous subscriptions.

This topic was started with initial preview introduction of version 2.

We've put huge effort on version 2 development with all it's leading features like:
More realistic AI Voices. 
New panel fully integrated in MSFS with ability to open from Tablet/Mobile another computer.
Finally Speech Recognition - which is very close to initial demonstration.

Unfortunately - we can't solve all possible problems in one single shot, but we're doing our best.

And **INDEED** I believe you're doing a remarkable job !

While I was using Navigraph, FSHUD was my go to ATC / AI injection option since more than1 year when I started using it with P3D v5 and v6.

Now I am AI-injection-less and although I acknowledge the progresses made in the other ATC platform (AI oriented) I use, FSHUD is still the one I prefer among any other solution I used along the last 20 years starting with external ATC solutions for FSX.

I just wish one day you can also offer FSHUD for X-Plane, and I look forward to be able to use it again with MSFS 2020 or 2024 !

Thanks for the excellent support and the attention to users requests !!!

👍

Edited July 18, 20241 yr by jcomm

On 7/18/2024 at 12:46 PM, FSHud said:

That will be a next step - to take NavData directly from MSFS or alternative data sources by avoid continuous subscriptions.

This topic was started with initial preview introduction of version 2.

We've put huge effort on version 2 development with all it's leading features like:
More realistic AI Voices. 
New panel fully integrated in MSFS with ability to open from Tablet/Mobile another computer.
Finally Speech Recognition - which is very close to initial demonstration.

Unfortunately - we can't solve all possible problems in one single shot, but we're doing our best.

If you manage to do the thing of not needing the Navigraph subscription and getting it directly from the simulator, you will have earned a new client, and speaking with some friends the other day they mentioned precisely that as the main fault. Greetings.

 

On 7/18/2024 at 7:46 AM, FSHud said:

That will be a next step - to take NavData directly from MSFS or alternative data sources by avoid continuous subscriptions.

IMHO, I think this is absolutely mandatory for FShud.

I've just purchased the addon and tried it. I think is wonderful how it manages AI traffic, but nav data is completely outdated. In my test flight, I couldn't benefit from ATC departure/arrival instructions. I had to follow other SID/STAR procedures by my own. So ATC service provided by FSHud was pretty much useless.

I don't want to pay for a Navigraph subscription and I'm feeling forced to do so. This isn't properly warned by FSHud in its webpage. I see that refund is neither a option, so I'm currently stuck with a 35usd-partially useless addon. Very dissappointing. I wish you can address this issue and solve it in next update. 

Kind regards. 

30 minutes ago, reimonpilot said:

IMHO, I think this is absolutely mandatory for FShud.

I've just purchased the addon and tried it. I think is wonderful how it manages AI traffic, but nav data is completely outdated. In my test flight, I couldn't benefit from ATC departure/arrival instructions. I had to follow other SID/STAR procedures by my own. So ATC service provided by FSHud was pretty much useless.

I don't want to pay for a Navigraph subscription and I'm feeling forced to do so. This isn't properly warned by FSHud in its webpage. I see that refund is neither a option, so I'm currently stuck with a 35usd-partially useless addon. Very dissappointing. I wish you can address this issue and solve it in next update. 

Kind regards. 

It is clearly written in the product page under "Real-World Navigation" section.
https://www.flight1.com/products.asp?vid=flt1sf&pid=fshudv1

FSHud can utilize your Navigraph data subscription to stay current with the latest navigation. A default-outdated dataset is provided by Navigraph (at their determination) for users not on one of their data subscription plans. You will still be able to experience realistic flights, however in some cases you may need to follow specific FSHud vectors.

FSHud is ATC program not Navigational data provider - we use the data according to Navigraph rules.
While using outdated AIRAC, you still have the ability to perform ATC controlled flight gate-to-gate with FSHud panel guidance - so I definitely wouldn't call it "useless".
 

Is there any ETA for 2.0 for pubc release?

1 minute ago, AnkH said:

Is there any ETA for 2.0 for pubc release?

September or end of august

46 minutes ago, FSHud said:

FSHud is ATC program not Navigational data provider - we use the data according to Navigraph rules.
While using outdated AIRAC, you still have the ability to perform ATC controlled flight gate-to-gate with FSHud panel guidance - so I definitely wouldn't call it "useless".
 

Understood, but MSFS has its own nav data up to date. Is not as it was in FSX, where AIRAC cycle wasn't updated by the sim developer and you necessarily required a subscription. Now, these updates are provided by Microsoft-Asobo. 

So I don't see why FSHud requires a Navigraph subscription mandatorily. This is a huge upset. 

Regarding my "useless" word, I might have got too far there, but one as a sim pilot wants the controller to provide smooth instructions, taking into account standard departure/arrival procedures, not through vectors. 

 

48 minutes ago, reimonpilot said:

Understood, but MSFS has its own nav data up to date. Is not as it was in FSX, where AIRAC cycle wasn't updated by the sim developer and you necessarily required a subscription. Now, these updates are provided by Microsoft-Asobo. 

So I don't see why FSHud requires a Navigraph subscription mandatorily. This is a huge upset. 

Regarding my "useless" word, I might have got too far there, but one as a sim pilot wants the controller to provide smooth instructions, taking into account standard departure/arrival procedures, not through vectors. 

 

It was due to historical reasons.

Initially FSHud was built for P3D, therefore we decided to use LNM database as a source (which covers almost everything that is required).

Then MSFS was released (with no ability to read scenery at all).

And only after that - MSFS provided this ability, so as I said in previous post "it is in our plans to move to MSFS data" - but you have to understand the reasons for that
(and it's definitely not to force your for some kind of subscriptions).

We also asked Navigraph to update our outdated data, but none of response been given on that.

Hi. I am currently using FSHud (under P3D) and I really like it. It's a great tool. Thank you. I have some observations/wishes for any future updates. Maybe you could consider them? 

* Request a take off from an intersections instead of using the full runway length. I am not sure if this might be already covered in 2.0.

* Request for a diversion during flight due to weather. I am not taking about diverting to another airport. Just requesting going off track to avoid bad weather.

* Better traffic coordination. I have gotten a few TCAS alters due to very close traffic.

* Faster/ earlier handover. Especially during climb and descent I ofen have to level off because I need to switch to another station first. Same at the ground. It would be great to be able to call the tower way earlier.

Really looking forward to performance improvement in V2!

Edited August 26, 20241 yr by Divij

On 7/16/2024 at 8:07 PM, AnkH said:

Seriously? If your baseline FPS is 120, an FPS loss of 30% is less dramatic than with a baseline FPS of 30, thats why... And: you consider a drop from 70 down to 50, which is almost 30%, not a high FPS cost? 

On reminder it's not ATC but also injects traffic and monitor ground traffic... I don't have that loss in FPS more like 5 - 8 fps.
Which isn't different then the standalone traffic injector programs with the same traffic settings.

I actually think FSHUD 2.X is on the right track to become my default ATC/Traffic solution 😉 

Can anyone get FSLTL traffic injector to work in the background?

It works great if the sim is in windowed mode, but when I go full screen, the traffic injector stalls until it is the window with the focus.

Is there any work around or fix for this?

Cheers

Stu

I was doing good till 2 weeks ago.

Now tge minute I load it it freezes throughout the flight.

5 to 10 second burst.

Re installed. Tested different combinaton.

Just read maybe active weather. Last thing to test.

Maybe a ticket bit not very helpful.

 

 

 

On 8/4/2024 at 6:19 PM, reimonpilot said:

I don't want to pay for a Navigraph subscription and I'm feeling forced to do so.

Then don't. Just buy a single Airac a year. That's possible.

39 minutes ago, Farlis said:

Then don't. Just buy a single Airac a year. That's possible.

you cant because the fshud  use a terrible way to implement Airac where you get direct from the server from navigrapth so if your subscription ends you lose all old Airacs and back to the default  2101 that fshud has which is too much old and you gonna end having problem with aircrafts fmc. many people already complained but for some reason, they don't change the implementation way. is the worst part of fs hud you must have navigrapth subscription and for offline flight I think is not worth to pay every month better  once per year like you can do that with BATC or SI