October 1, 20241 yr I spotted those too! MacBook Neo: A18 Pro with 6-core processor and 5-core graphics 8GB Unified Memory, macOS Tahoe, X-Plane 12 (12.40). Mac mini: M4 chip with 10 core processor, 10 core graphics, 16 GB Unified Memory, 256GB SSD, macOS Tahoe, X-Plane 12 (12.40), X-Plane 11 (11.55). Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX9: Intel Core i9-14900HX, 32GB DDR5-4800 RAM, 1TB Micron NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8 GB GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 16EU iGPU, Windows 11 Home, MSFS 2024 and 2020, X-Plane 12 (12.40), X-Plane 11 (11.55) and Lenovo LOQ 15 15IAX9: Intel Core i5-12450HX, 24GB DDR5-4800 RAM, 1TB Solidigm NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 4GB GPU and Intel UHD Graphics 16EU iGPU, Windows 11 Home, MSFS 2024 and 2020, XX-Plane 12 (12.40), X-Plane 11 (11.55). Alienware m15 R7: Intel Core i7-12700H, 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8GB, Windows 11 Home, MSFS 2024 and 2020, X-Plane 12 (12.40), X-Plane 11 (11.55).
October 1, 20241 yr So what features got enhanced with this update ? Not trying to be snark. It just states three aircraft have been enhanced but no details as to what ways they were enhanced ? AMD Ryzen 9800X3D/ Asus ROG Strix B650E F Gaming WiFi / Asrock Taichi 9070XT / 32GB G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo DDR5 6000 / 2x ADATA XPG 8200 Pro NVME / Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 / Seasonic Vertex 1000w PSU / Lian Li LanCool II Mesh Performance / Asus VG34VQL3A / Topping E70 Velvet DAC & L70 Amp /Sennheiser HD660s2 Thrustmaster Boeing Yoke + TCA Sidestick + TFRP Rudders
October 1, 20241 yr Author 1 minute ago, Maxis said: So what features got enhanced with this update ? Not trying to be snark. It just states three aircraft have been enhanced but no details as to what ways they were enhanced ? The patch notes aren't out yet. But from what we know from dev streams, the Neov2 has performance updates, faster takeoff thrust and a whole new LNAV. Edited October 1, 20241 yr by Tuskin38
October 1, 20241 yr Seems crazy to me that no one on the MS testing team has Navigraph. Like that has to be one of the most widely used add-ons in the community. Nick Running
October 1, 20241 yr Author 6 minutes ago, nrunning24 said: Seems crazy to me that no one on the MS testing team has Navigraph. Like that has to be one of the most widely used add-ons in the community. It's not their job to make sure addons are compatible.
October 1, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said: It's not their job to make sure addons are compatible. Disagree, both parties are responsible for fluid implementation of new patches. I am sure if ASOBO would give time and data well in advance to Navigraph guys they would manage. Artur
October 1, 20241 yr The question is! Does navigraph know? Life time flight sim enthusiast, current airplane owner 172P (past C182F). FAA CP/IR ASEL/AMEL, FI ASELMy System: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D , MSI X870 GAMING PLUS, 64G RAM, ASUS RTX5090, 4T SSDPut my hands on (pic/dual/given)7GCAA, 8KCAB, BE24, BE76, BE35-C33, BE35, C150, C152, C172B/N/P/R/SP, 182F, M20E,M20C, M20J, AT6(SNJ4), PA28-140,PA28-151, PA28-161,PA28-181,PA28RT-201,PA28R-180/201T, PA24-250, PA32-300R, PA44, AC114, YAK-18T, YAK-52, SR22
October 1, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said: It's not their job to make sure addons are compatible. I'm not saying its their job and I'm sure it will be fixed ASAP, I'm just more surprised that what is likely the most popular addon in the community wasn't on any of their computers while before releasing to the public. And what do you expect 3rd party devs to do, as of this moment Navigraph has no clue why their data is causing a CTD, as MS haven't published anything to them on the changes. Not the most friendly update process when your whole money making platform is selling 3rd party content via your store. Nick Running
October 1, 20241 yr Yes. Navigraph know. https://forum.navigraph.com/t/aau3-and-navigraph-crash-msfs/17062 Thomas ( Sundsvall, ESNN, Sweden) MSFS 2024, Intel 9 9900K Oc 5 GHZ 16MB, Corsair Hydro H150i PRO RGB 360mm, ASUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB ROG, 2 Corsair Force M2 MP600 1TB+500Gb, ASUS ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO Z390 MB, Corsair 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 3200Mhz CL16, Fractal Design Define S2 Vision, Win 10 Home, BenQ 32" PD3200U 4K IPS monitor A2A Comanche, WB Sim Cessna 152
October 1, 20241 yr Author I'm not seeing any missing textures in the NeoV2 cockpit. But I am using ini made livery from their launcher + updated the A320 Enhancement package in the content manager.
October 1, 20241 yr FYI FOR BETA GROUP MEMBERS. MS posted earlier today that only non-beta group users were updated this morning meaning that if you are a regular beta tester you did not receive the update like me today…until now! I just got the update and as it was loading I removed the offending airac and am currently on the load screen. Fingers crossed. If I get the dreaded CTD I will update. -B Edited October 1, 20241 yr by btacon
October 1, 20241 yr 16 minutes ago, Beardyman said: Disagree, both parties are responsible for fluid implementation of new patches. I am sure if ASOBO would give time and data well in advance to Navigraph guys they would manage. That is not how it works. Navigraph is an add-on FOR MSFS. It's Navigraph's responsibility to make sure that it works well with MSFS as well as the other sims it is to be used with. By your logic, it'd be Microsoft's responsibility to make sure every add-on for MSFS on the planet works with every update, which is obviously impossible and highly illogical to request. The fact that Navigraph says "it's a sim issue" means that they don't get how this works either, so you're in good company. If their add-on doesn't work with the simulator, it's their issue, not a sim issue. The fact that an update of the simulator initiated the problem is irrelevant. The responsibility to ensure compatibility lays always with the add-on developer. Never with the main software's developer. Edited October 1, 20241 yr by Abriael Editor-in-Chief at SimulationDaily.com
October 1, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Abriael said: That is not how it works. Navigraph is an add-on FOR MSFS. It's Navigraph's responsibility to make sure that it works well with MSFS as well as the other sims it is to be used with. By your logic, it'd be Microsoft's responsibility to make sure every add-on for MSFS on the planet works with every update, which is obviously impossible and highly illogical to request. And they will, but how are they supposed to know to change something to make it work when MSFS pushes an update with no notice and no change list? Like MS should have someone on the testing team with at least a few of the most popular add ons so they can at least give advance notice to the devs that changes are needed. Nick Running
October 1, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, nrunning24 said: And they will, but how are they supposed to know to change something to make it work when MSFS pushes an update with no notice and no change list? Like MS should have someone on the testing team with at least a few of the most popular add ons so they can at least give advance notice to the devs that changes are needed. MS/Asobo struggle testing their own software let alone others 😂 it's an interesting discussion though, i recall similar from way back when in the car racing sim world, certainly plenty of Pros & Cons for a Dev to test 3rd party mods/apps before update releases. Pico Neo3 Link VR - Windows 11 64bit, Gigabyte Z590 Aorus Elite Mobo, i7-10700KF CPU, Gigabyte RX 9070 XT OC 16gb (AMD GPU), 32gig Corsair 3600mhz RAM, SSD x2 + M.2 SSD 1tb x1 Saitek X45 HOTAS - Saitek Pro Rudder Pedals - Logitech Flight Yoke - Homemade 3 Button & 8-directional Joystick Box, SNES Controller (used as a Button Box - Additional USB Numpad (used as a Button Box)
October 1, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, nrunning24 said: And they will, but how are they supposed to know to change something to make it work when MSFS pushes an update with no notice and no change list? Like MS should have someone on the testing team with at least a few of the most popular add ons so they can at least give advance notice to the devs that changes are needed. The fact that the AAU3 was coming today was known and previously announced. There was plenty of notice. "a few of the most popular addons" is a very elastic string to hang from. Who decides where to draw the line? There is a TON of popular add-ons out there. If an add-on stops working after an update, it's that add-on's developer's responsibility to either find a solution or reach out for help. They have only one software to ensure compatibility with (or a few, in Navigraph's case). The simulator's developer would have thousands to keep track of unless they start making favorites, which is silly to suggest. Editor-in-Chief at SimulationDaily.com
Create an account or sign in to comment