Funky D

I believe the issue is most noticeable with analog gauges, if you fly mostly in glass cockpits you may never see the issue.

...for half-baked advice. Pretty sure the sim does not even have the ability to touch the Windows Narrator settings, but by reposting this it just adds to the algorithm and gives this bad advice to more people. Settings -> Accessibility -> Narration and audio -> Enable Screen Narrator This is also available right when you start the sim, I believe there is a direct button to the accessibility settings.

And lately, more and more people have then been posting the incorrect or partially correct "answers" here or Reddit or Discord or name your forum of choice. If the poster wanted an AI response instead of a response from a human that knew what they were talking about, they could just go straight to ChatGPT or Claude or Gemini or name your AI of choice. LLM's do not know the answer. They do not know how to reason. They take the massive amount of data they have access to and churn out a response. The source of that response could be a sarcastic troll or a combination of information that may be related to original question but isn't actually the answer to the original question at all. I've asked AI about things readily available online... I asked the length of a 5090FE and it gave me random lengths from (presumably) other 5090 cards. I've asked AI the location of MSFS 2024's application folder and it gave me the location of 2020's folder instead. And it gave those wrong answers very authoratively! AI isn't taking jobs because it knows how to do anything... it's taking jobs because the former human employees wrote very detailed processes and the AI was trained on that data. It's why AI is good at coding: there are millions of GitHub code repositories out there that helped train AI. But AI doesn't actually know how to code... it just knows how to spit out code that was already used, hopefully in a working application. AI doesn't have access to the MSFS source code. It can't give any super special tips and tricks for MSFS that aren't already available online. Sometimes those tips and tricks are valid, and sometimes they are snake oil... just like AI itself.

Have you tried disabling any audio devices you don't use? If you go to the Windows Control Panel -> Sound, you can right click any playback and recording device you don't use and disable. I remember seeing this fixing the audio issues for some people... I personally haven't had any audio issues since SU4.

The EFB is also crooked for me at the start of each flight, but you can right click drag the edges to rotate the EFB so it's horizontal, or you can use the scroll wheel while the mouse is along the edge to rotate. Then left click drag will angle the EFB up or down. Hope this helps!

I am fine with "unrealistic" products as long as they're marketed correctly and priced fairly. Plenty of casual users want to fly simple planes that look nice... with MScenery they were getting an overpriced product with flashy marketing pics and ended up sitting in a cockpit that looked like it came out of Minecraft. It would be nice if they added a marketplace filter for realism so the more arcade-like products could be filtered out.

Big respect for AvAngel calling out MScenery in one of her recent videos. It takes some guts as one of the top MSFS content creators to push back on something that was obviously making MS money. We'll never know how many gullible console users forked over real money for sub-FSX-freeware-quality aircraft, but hopefully the bad purchases won't keep those users away from the many great marketplace products. MS/Asobo really need to follow this up with new marketplace rules: No AI-enhanced product images and no review manipulation.

There is also the issue of bandwidth... higher satellite and TIN resolution = more data to stream. People like to blame the consoles for Asobo downgrading the satellite resolution in both 2024 and 2020, but I would wager the real reasoning behind the downgrade was someone at MS took notice of the bandwidth being used and forced Asobo to cut the resolution to reduce costs. Apple Maps seems to have higher resolution elevation data for many of their 3D locations than Google or Bing maps... I wonder if this is less about any technical differences and more about the lower popularity of Apple Maps negating the extra bandwidth needed for higher resolutions. The resolutions available for commercial and government use are probably crazy detailed.

Have you downloaded any of the world updates or marketplace airports or planes? Downloading any of the streamed content will increase the sim load time... the more you download, the longer it will take to load.

I only notice "melted" buildings when there are trees around the buildings that cause the building to basically morph into the blob of the tree, or at a distance with smaller objects. For instance, the antennas on top of the Sears Tower in Chicago look more like spires at a distance, but as you get closer the higher LOD kicks in and the antennas become more detailed. The same can happen with bridges, cranes and towers. As mentioned above, Bijan cleans up some trees in his Seasons product, and if this is something affecting your home airport he does take requests. For me the benefits of PG outweigh the negatives and I just deal with the occasional building-tree blob. If this affected my home airport though, I could see being more annoyed by it.

I loathe the default ATC as much as everyone else, but I just find it a bit sad that even the add-on products have the same issues as the default ATC. Basically the only time the default ATC is somewhat reliable is when flying into larger airports. Maybe its a core sim issue in the end, but from what I've read of other sims they have similar issues. I'm not knocking BATC, but as someone who is stuck with the default ATC in career mode, it IS serviceable for the most part when flying into large airports, and it gets tripped up in the same way I've read other add-on products get tripped up.

Under these constraints the default ATC works fairly well, so the only thing you're really gaining from BATC are the more realistic voices and chatter.

Texture-wise, I think the new satellite imagery and PG come close to the resolution of DD's Chicago Landmarks, minus the crazy performance hit. You can see signs, murals and graffiti on buildings and read billboards along the expressways. The elevation data also seems to have been updated, at least on the PG, which makes things look more sharp and less "melted". I'll take the darker buildings downtown over the light-colored buildings speckled throughout DD's scenery that stood out like a sore thumb. The dark buildings are unfortunately a result of the satellite data... glass buildings tend to be too dark and while there is some reflection on some of the buildings, it's not as intense as the reflections you see off a glass building in real life. Once you add shadows as well it all becomes too dark at a distance. It would be nice if there were a "lite" Chicago Landmarks addon created some day that only included the most popular landmarks with less of a performance hit than the DD scenery. Giving proper textures/materials to 20 or so buildings downtown could go a long way to brightening up the area, but it may be tricky to make it fit in with the PG.

It is strange that this person seemingly created an AVSim account solely to bash this plane. It's almost like too many good things were being said about the iFly and they wanted to bash it a bit for the "algorithm". Anyways, I'll leave those conspiracy theories at the door.

Last I checked, it wasn't compatible with 2024 (duplicate taxiway markings and other weird stuff). It was a great airport in 2020 tho!

They finally updated the 15-year-old satellite data in Chicago... Maggie Daley Park is no longer an ugly construction zone, but the sim overdid the trees as usual. Would have been nice to see a bespoke KPWK, but I'll take the updated imagery (even prior to the update, the PG in Chicago was pretty high res).

The marketplace version has been updated. Flies like a different plane, in a good way! Much more stable and predictable... in the past I was always fighting with the rudder/rudder trim to try and keep it coordinated. Now I can set full right rudder trim on takeoff and not touch it again until cruise. Turns don't send the turn coordinator flying all over the place anymore, I can easily predict how much rudder it needs. Pattern work was much less work than prior to the update. Short final was also predictable. I won't resurrect the Kodiak vs BS Caravan thread, but @sd_flyer , you can now bring this bird in fully loaded at 75kts without falling from the sky. I floated it to test the stall speed and it matched up to the speed tape, although I don't think it's normal to bring it in that slow IRL (and controls were unbearably sluggish at those speeds). I just did some pattern work and a quick skydive career mission to make sure that was fixed (it was), but my initial impressions were good. The Kodiak has been collecting dust in my hangar, but suffice to say I will be flying it a bit more now. I'd encourage anyone else who has shelved it to give it another go!

Some aircraft are modified as well... I read there are aftermarket autothrottle systems available that some Phenoms have installed. The factory-available autothrottle has only been around for a year or so and none of the real pilots who tested this addon have used it, which is why it was omitted. Looks like 72 Phenoms were delivered last year and I'm sure not all of them are fully decked out, so the autothrottle versions are likely still pretty rare in the wild.

I've found the FADEC system handles this nicely though... even if the throttle is slightly off, the power numbers are usually dead on or within 0.1-0.2% of what the target should be. You can use the power numbers instead of looking down at the throttle as well... as you pull back the throttle after takeoff for instance, you'll notice the power status on the MFD changes from TO to CLB along with the optimal power setting. Get close to these target numbers and the FADEC seems to handle the rest.

Not sure how many "VIP's" you've had to deal with in real life, but this sounds pretty realistic to me! You are basically dealing with a millionaire/billionaire toddler who is used to getting everything they want on a silver platter. Anything that isn't perfect is your fault, because you are the only one they can blame!

I'm wondering if this is basically a compromise to deal with poor ground handling in MSFS. Since you don't really flare with the Phenom as much as you pitch up and fly it into the runway, firming up the suspension may cause bounces or other weird behavior. I've dealt with the same issue in higher crosswinds, but I have yet to have a wing strike (even though it sometimes looks like I should have gotten a wing strike!) Try switching to a different livery and then back... it's mentioned in the manual that this "resets" some of the tablet functionality. What you're experiencing definitely sounds like a bug that a few others are experiencing.

If only Asobo would take notice... This tool seems to cover a few of my main gripes with career mode mission generation: appropriate airports and performance data for aircraft. With a week of actual human man hours and some custom curation of data, you've addressed what Asobo's procedural mission generation system still fails with 1.5 years after launch. Since I'm usually in career mode this tool doesn't have much use for me, but I appreciate your contribution to the community nonetheless!

This whole thread just makes me question why publishers like Orbx still exist if they don't test or offer assistance to the developers that release products on their behalf? What benefit do they provide that you can't already get by just releasing directly through the marketplace? I would guess any sales gained by including the consoles would surpass the lost revenue from those who refuse to purchase from the marketplace. Like others I was a huge fan of Orbx in the FSX days, and I bought a few of their airports for 2020 that were barely above FSX standards. That was enough to show me the glory days for Orbx were over...

Updates are released to the marketplace within a day or two of the dev sending it to Asobo for review... multiple devs have confirmed this on the official forums. It took much longer a year ago, but the Phenom is proof that marketplace updates can be released quickly. When devs release "exclusively" to other stores first, they are likely doing so because they make more money selling through those channels. When they delay updates, they are likely using the early updates they release directly as beta tests to avoid releasing a buggy update to the MP.

I haven't, but it's probably easier to deal with all of those comments in one place. Raul has also been active on the official forums but the moderation is stricter over there when insults start flying. I reluctantly tried landing on a 4500ft runway last night... winds were calm, and I floated a little bit (still need to get used to flying this thing into the ground as required!) I was very careful with the brakes, only using a bit of pressure at speed and then increasing as I slowed down, and also letting off and back on as I got slow. Had plenty of runway left, so I think braking is just a matter of practice to find the sweet spot. Definitely not flying this bird into any runway less than 4000ft though!